We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBreonna Vercoe
Modified over 2 years ago
regulating the engineering profession Accrediting Engineering Degrees: Practice and Challenges Richard Shearman Director of Formation
regulating the engineering profession 2© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved The UK engineering profession 36 professional bodies – vary in size and history Own requirements for membership Common framework provided by UK-SPEC and ECUK register of CEng, IEng and EngTech 21 accredit HE programmes Not compulsory to join or register with ECUK to work as engineer – but c. 5k new registrants p.a.
regulating the engineering profession 3© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved Engineering Council (UK) National Registration Body for Chartered Engineers, Incorporated Engineers and Engineering Technicians Sets standards for professional qualification and registration (UK-SPEC) Sets criteria for accreditation of HE programmes Licenses professional bodies to accredit programmes and assess and register individuals QA function linked to licensing Maintains database of accredited programmes Signatory to international accords
regulating the engineering profession 4© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved The value of accreditation Establishes a standard Constructive engagement between profession and HE Share good practice Aid development and innovation Kitemark and third party validation for HEI Helps graduate/professional mobility Simplifies qualification process
regulating the engineering profession Accreditation - History Began in 1960s and 1970s A different HE scene Predates national QA arrangements for universities Steady shift from input to output Can the accreditation process remain adaptable? 5© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved
regulating the engineering profession 6© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved Accreditation: key current features ECUK sets and maintains standards Outcomes-based accreditation Distributed system of accreditation Distinct from the UK’s HE quality assurance system Uses qualifications framework and descriptors as reference points International recognition
regulating the engineering profession 7© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved Current accreditation arrangements Peer review by volunteers Written submission and visit Scrutiny of student work, exam papers etc Meet with students and staff The programme not the institution Rigour and demands are balanced
regulating the engineering profession 8© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved Requirements for accreditation Focus on outcomes, not curriculum All graduates achieve all learning outcomes Clear programme aims, outcomes, assessment Evidence of industrial liaison Sufficient content at B or M level Adequately resourced
regulating the engineering profession 9© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved What about input measures? A number are considered including: - Learning and teaching processes - Department/School/Faculty organisation - Human and material resources - Cohort entry profile - Staff experience and professional status These are indicators, not metrics or showstoppers
regulating the engineering profession 10© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved The output standards Four general learning outcomes - Knowledge & Understanding, Intellectual Abilities, Practical Skills, General Transferable Skills Five Specific Learning Outcomes - Underpinning Science and Maths, Engineering Analysis, Design, Economic, Social and Environmental Context, Engineering Practice More detailed statements describe each of these Now adopted by QAA as subject benchmark
regulating the engineering profession 11© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved International Context Washington & Sydney Accords allow mutual recognition of accreditation decisions Graduate Attributes framework developed but several signatories are process-orientated Washington Accord verification visit to UK revealed differences in approach In Europe, EURACE framework for engineering accreditation More countries showing interest in accreditation (China, Russia)
regulating the engineering profession Sharing good practice Between professional bodies and between universities EAB is key to former – forum for discussion, organises joint visits, common documentation etc Websites, annual reports etc can highlight university good practice Engineering Subject Centre, EPC also have vital role 12© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved
regulating the engineering profession 13© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved The changing landscape UK demographics: less homogeneous cohorts Development of higher level skills Changing employer demands New forms of provision Increasing number of multidisciplinary programmes
regulating the engineering profession 14© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved Some challenges for accreditation Giving due recognition to work-based elements Who is responsible for assessment? Assuring level and standards in new forms of provision More individually tailored programmes – resourcing Longer completion periods Encouraging cultural shift - accreditors and others Monitoring programme change Spreading innovation and improvement
regulating the engineering profession 15© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved Distance Learning Achieving learning outcomes that are normally demonstrated in a laboratory Module choice resulting in individually tailored and/or limited programme scope Robustness of student support systems Open-ended nature and long completion periods The engineering employer’s role?
regulating the engineering profession 16© 2008 EC UK all rights reserved The way ahead? Changes tend to be in inputs rather than in outcomes Current accreditation processes are applicable Mechanisms to bring employers more fully into the process Dialogue between all: universities, professional bodies and employers
The Academic Infrastructure and IQER Wendy Stubbs Assistant Director
Engaging Academia in the Industry Skills Agenda David Cracknell Director of Lifelong Learning Construction Industry Council [CIC is a partner in ConstructionSkills.
Barcelona, the 28th of September ENQA in 2010 and beyond Bruno Curvale ENQA President Evaluation in Higher Education an introduction to the discussion.
Bruno Curvale President of the ENQA board 3rd of June 2009 Brussels European QA in Higher Education after the Leuven Louvain-la-Neuve ministerial meeting.
Presenting: Unit V1 Who this presentation is suitable for? Internal verifier-candidates working towards Unit V1: Conduct internal quality assurance of.
Admissions Policy and HE Strategy Professionalising Admission to Higher Education in Further Education Conference Tuesday 2 March 2010 Annie Doyle, Senior.
Balancing Quality Enhancement and Accountability Reforming the Dutch and Flemish accreditation system Stephan van Galen.
Embedding Institutional Curricular Priorities in the First Year Embedding Institutional Curricular Priorities in the First Year A Case Study from RGU Roger.
Quality assurance considerations in work- based learning provision Wendy Stubbs Assistant Director Development and enhancement Group
1 ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT IT MEANS. 2 ORIGINS Dearing report 1997 Dearing report 1997 Proposals: Proposals: framework for qualifications and awards.
European Education Policies Gaby Hostens 16th AEEE Conference Ghent, August 23rd 2006.
Learning outcomes: Recognising Prior Learning Ruth Whittaker Caledonian Academy Glasgow Caledonian University
1 International guidelines: Similarities and Criticisms Dr. Antony Stella, Audit Director Australian Universities Quality Agency & APQN Board Member.
Learning Outcomes & Staff Development Dr Lorraine Walsh, University of Dundee Bologna Stakeholder Conference February 2008 Heriot.
Using Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria Peter Noakes Department of Electronic Systems Engineering University of Essex.
Eur Ing Jo ã o Paulo Ponciano M.Eng, MA, MIET, C.Eng, MBCS, CITP, FHEA, Cert. Legal PROMOTING MOBILITY AND EMPLOYABILITY BY HARMONISING ENGINEERING PROGRAMMES.
Internal Quality Assurance seminar Common challenges among QAA ENQA Review Committee perspective Guy Aelterman Den Haag,15-16 June 2009.
SOFIA NOVEMBER 9, Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education ARACIS Candidate Member of ENQA QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ROMANIAN HIGHER.
Qualifications Update: Sciences Qualifications Update: Sciences.
Quality developments in VET An overview of the work of the European Forum on Quality in VET.
Current Issues in Admissions Policy and Practice: the view from SPA Professionalising Admissions HE in FE Conference 2 March 2010 Missenden Abbey Janet.
Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Bologna and the Aberdeen Curriculum Review Presentation to the Curriculum Review Steering Group, 26 June 2008 Graeme Roberts Senior Associate, Higher Education.
Qualifications Update: Engineering Science Qualifications Update: Engineering Science.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE BOLOGNA PROCESS* ACE ANNUAL MEETING FEBRUARY 9, 2009 JEAN A. MORSE, PRESIDENT MIDDLE STATES COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION
Moshe Kam* and Michael Lightner** * Robert Quinn Professor and Head; Electrical and Computer Engineering, Drexel University **Professor and Chair; Electrical,
Capacity development & learning in evaluation Uganda Evaluation Week 19 th to 223 rd May 2014.
Keynote 2: Combining programme and institutional aspects in QA: U.K. Nick Harris QAA - UK.
Managing Academic Quality and Standards – Part I: The External Environment 23 Nov 07 Tim Burton, University Senior Quality Officer.
3 The European Qualifications Framework for Life Long Learning Implications for the National Context – a View of a Member State Vienna, 21 October 2005.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.