Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJulio Scates Modified over 9 years ago
1
UMCM: One Institution’s Implementation Experience with Kuali Curriculum Management Michelle Appel – Functional Lead | UMD, College Park Joseph Drasin – Project Manager | UMD, College Park Garey Taylor – Technical Lead | UMD, College Park
2
2 Large “flagship” University 12 Colleges, over 100 departments 150+ programs of study, depending on definition 26,000+ undergraduates, 10,000+ grad students ~8,000 employees including ~ 1,500 T/Tk faculty Growing Kuali Community on campus Rice & COEUS (MIT) in production KFS in Development COEUS & OLE in early stages Legacy, homegrown SIS on a mainframe Challenges with ability to sustain expertise on technology Difficulty continuing to meet changing campus needs University of Maryland
3
3 Team based in College Park, MD, South Africa, and Vancouver, BC KS 1.2.2 codebase (this is incorporated into CM 2.0) Focused year 1 implementation on course proposal and approval Create a course Modify a course Retire a course Workflow Authorization Dependency analysis ….(ADD) Project Introduction
4
4 Large multi-disciplinary distributed team Structural evolution Support of operations and ongoing development Current Structure Data Team (Functional & Technical) Software Development Team Functional Working Group (including UI) Quality Assurance Documentation and Training Rice coordination team *NEW* Organizational structure
5
5 Hybrid Upfront Waterfall Style Requirements Gathering Dedicated Business Analysts Dedicated Subject Matter Experts Agile Style Development Two Week Sprints Daily Standups Product Owner Priority Meetings Sprint Retrospectives Agile in Production Balancing O&M with new development Development Methodologies
6
6 Major Milestones 7/21/2011 Project Kickoff 8/26/2011 Milestone 0 “Infrastructure” 11/1/2011 Milestone 1 “The Plumbing” 12/13/2011 Milestone 2 “Soft Launch” 1/31/2012 Milestone 3 “Production Build” 3/29/2012 “Go-Live” – First record processed July 2012 Major Release (Retire by Proposal) August 2012 Became system of record August 2012 Major Release (VPAC Agenda) October 2012 Major Release (Dependency Analysis) Where are we today Onboarding and training additional colleges Adding new features and bug fixing Preparing for CM 2.0 implementation Looking into how CM fits into ENR (particularly with data) Project Timeline
7
7 Fantastic Busy Tedious Slow Tenuous Hectic Chaotic Amazing What is it like being live
8
8 Where We Came From – Course Proposal
9
9 Where We Came From – Course Lookup
10
10 Public Site – www.testudo.umd.edu/ks
11
11 Data work – mapping, clean-up, loading Localization UI Syntax Fields Authorization setup Workflow Rules Configuration – types, categories Data entry Retire a course Summary of Major areas of Work
12
12 Management Operations + Development = Less Sleep Be Flexible Communication and coordination with functional stakeholders is key Set manageable (small) scope Set expectations Prepare for the unexpected (technically and functionally) Stick to time box – Don’t go off the rails High visibility, but low volume use and impact System of record issues will need to be addressed Lessons Learned – Management
13
13 Functional Data work is a huge effort – start early Sometimes you don't know enough to make the decisions Development possibilities and directions Changing campus needs and business processes Software has features campus wants, but isn’t ready for Timing of functional input can be challenging “Hurry up and wait” Dedicated analysis time Find forgiving functional users – testers, pilot users Be open to new collaboration tools, willing to adjust midstream Develop an outward facing site Get Rice expertise – functional and technical Lessons Learned – Functional
14
14 Technical Development Methodologies Development Environment Setup Development Tools (Confluence, Jira, Bamboo) Local Overlay Project (Coding Environment) Kuali Student 1.2.1 Server Environments Data Load Testing Authorization Running in Production Lessons Learned – Technical
15
15 Local Overlay Project KS 1.2.2 Base Dependency 5 Local Sub Projects Umd-cm-cfg-dbs – DBs Baseline Developer Reference Umd-cm-impl – Impl Overrides Umd-cm-rice – Rice Overlay Umd-cm-ui – UI Overrides Umd-cm-web – WAR Deploys Local Development Environment
16
16 Confluence – Wiki Functional Documentation Design Specs Developer Documentation Development Tools - Confluence
17
17 JIRA – Issue Tracking Functional Issue Tracking Technical Issue Tracking Development Tools - JIRA
18
18 Bamboo– Continuous Integration Test Code Compilation Build Development Artifacts Test Data Load: UM->KS Test Deployment Test UI via Selenium Development Tools - Bamboo
19
19 “Special” Collaborative Patch Branch First Full Reference Implementation Critical Issues Will Be Found Collaboration Between UMD, NWU, and KS Now running off a local copy of KS CM Waiting for contribution model to be finalized KS 1.2.2
20
20 Dev Nightly Build – Full Data Load Public Nightly Build – Reference Impex Load QA Manual Build – Full Data Load Duplicate of Production Env 4 KS App Servers Running Parallel Production Manual Build One Initial Load Nightly Update Load Server Environments
21
21 Tool to Populate KS Implementation with UMD Data Loads into KS via Web Services DB to DB was deemed to complex Web Service Contract Stability Low Volume Full Load run every night to test iterative changes Production loads will only update changes Data Load Testing
22
22 KS 1.1 & 1.2 Partially Implemented Authorization Adding Standard UI Authorization framework Finer grained permission checking Authorization
23
23 Have an effective QA process and try to stick to a release schedule Improve the product by contributing back patches Have developers that will maintain the product train on one of the national teams for a month Best way get up to speed quickly Establish relationships Learn a lot about effective software development Running In Production
24
24 Michelle Appel – mappel@umd.edu Joe Drasin – jdrasin@umd.edu Chris Mann – cmann@umd.edu Garey Taylor – gpt@umd.edu Questions?
25
25 Appendix
26
26 DEMO (MA)
27
27 KS Landing Page (MA) New color scheme, navigation menu moved
28
28 CM Landing Page (MA)
29
29 Create a Course – Course Information (MA) Changes in headings, configured & additional fields
30
30 Create a Course – Governance (MA) Maryland data, constrained values
31
31 Create a Course – Course Logistics (MA) Customized values
32
32 Create a Course – Course Requisites (MA) New Rule Types
33
33 Where We’re Headed (MA)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.