Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Next Three Years June 16,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Next Three Years June 16,"— Presentation transcript:

1 International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Next Three Years June 16, 2011

2 The Challenges Common Core State Standards (CCSS)Common Core State Standards (CCSS)

3 The Challenges Common Core State Standards (CCSS)Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Next Generation Assessments (NGA)Next Generation Assessments (NGA)

4 The Challenges -Common Core State Standards (CCSS)-Common Core State Standards (CCSS) -Next Generation Assessments (NGA)-Next Generation Assessments (NGA) -Teacher Effectiveness based on Student Performance-Teacher Effectiveness based on Student Performance

5 The Challenges -Common Core State Standards (CCSS)-Common Core State Standards (CCSS) -Next Generation Assessments (NGA)-Next Generation Assessments (NGA) -Teacher Effectiveness based on Student Performance-Teacher Effectiveness based on Student Performance -Prepare Students for the world beyond School-Prepare Students for the world beyond School

6 FOCUS What is Effective

7 Researched Based Data Rich – Analysis Poor

8 Researched Based Data Rich – Analysis Poor Meta Analysis

9 Researched Based Data Rich – Analysis Poor Meta Analysis Visible Learning –John Hattie -800 Meta Analysis -52,637

10 Five Categories Students Teachers Schools/Districts Curricula Home

11 SCALE -138 Factors

12 SCALE -138 Factors -Effect

13 SCALE -138 Factors -Effect -Standard Deviations

14 SCALE -138 Factors -Effect -Standard Deviations -1 SD = 2 years growth

15 -0.69 to 0.61-0.55 to 0.51-0.45 to 0.41 -0.35 to 0.31-0.25 to 0.21-0.15 to 0.11-0.05 to 0.010.05 to 0.090.15 to 0.190.25 to 0.290.35 to 0.390.45 to 0.490.55 to 0.59 0.65 to 0.690.75 to 0.79 0.85 to 0.89 0.95 to 0.991.05 to 1.091.15 to 1.19 1.25 to 1.29 1.35 to 1.39 1.45 to 1.491.55 to 1.591.65 to 1.691.80 to 1.89 2.00+ Number of Effects Across 800+ Meta-analyses Effect Size Source: Visible Learning

16 FOCUS What is Effective What you can Impact

17 FOCUS What is Effective What you can Impact -Nations Most Successful Practices

18 FOCUS What is Effective What you can Impact -Nations Most Successful Practices -International Best Practices

19 Student Teacher Relationships 02 years 1.44 years.72

20 Application of Knowledge 02 years 1.30 years.65

21 Professional Development 02 years 1.24 years.62

22 FOCUS What is Effective What you can NOT Impact

23 Socioeconomic Status 02 years 1.14 years.57

24 You Can Not Change Where YOUR STUDENTS CAME FROM but You Can Change Where YOUR STUDENTS ARE GOING

25 FOCUS What is Effective What you can Impact What is most Efficient

26

27 Effective and Efficient Framework High Cost Low Cost

28 Effective and Efficient Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst

29 Effective and Efficient Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance CDCDABABCDCDABAB EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst

30 COST EFFECTIVENESS SCALE Efficient.

31 GREATEST IMPACT What is Effective What you can Impact What is most Efficient

32 Students own Expectations 0 0ver 2 years +1.44

33 FINDINGS TEACHERS are our greatest HOPE

34 Application of Knowledge 02 years 1.30 years.65

35 Application of Knowledge.80

36 Application of Knowledge

37 Student Teacher Relationship

38 Professional Development

39 Plan Instruction based on how Students Learn

40 Teacher Expectations and Clarity

41 Assessment to inform and differentiate instruction

42 Meta-Cognitive Strategies

43 Literacy Strategies

44 Peer Tutoring

45 What is less Effective and Efficient

46 Class Size

47 Summer School

48 0.72 0.90 0.62 0.75 0.40 0.67 0.90 0.60 0.75 0.90 0.69 0.80 0.60 0.65 0.55 0.75 0.21 0.20 0.30 0.55 0.22 0.90 0.23 0.20 Student Teacher PD Prior Achieve Form. Eval. Teacher Clarity Meta Strats. Literacy Strats. Peer Tutor Class Size Ability Group Teach Test Summer School

49 19 th Annual Model Schools Conference June 26 – 29, 2011 www.ModelSchoolsConference.com

50 GREATEST IMPACT Culture of High Expectations Relevance of Instruction Strong Relationships

51 FINDINGS TEACHERS are our greatest HOPE

52 Key to Effective Instruction is Alignment Organizational Leadership Instructional Leadership Teacher

53 Aligned to make Teacher Successful Doctors/Nurses in Hospitals

54 Aligned to make Teacher Successful Doctors/Nurses in Hospitals Lawyers in a Law Firm

55 Aligned for Success Doctors/Nurses in Hospitals Lawyers in a Law Firm Troops in Battle

56 Aligned for Success Doctors/Nurses in Hospitals Lawyers in a Law Firm Troops in Battle Teachers in a School System

57 Top Down Support for Bottom Up Success

58 THE KEY Effective Instruction THE KEY Effective Instruction

59 Teaching Organizational Leadership Instructional Leadership Learner Achievement

60 Embrace rigorous and relevant expectations for all students (+.75) Build strong relationship with students (+.72) Possess depth of content knowledge and make it relevant to students (+.80) Teaching Use assessments to guide and differentiate instruction (+.90) Facilitate rigorous and relevant instruction based on how students learn (+.1.28) UUse of Technology and best practices (+.80)

61 Organizational Leadership Create a Culture of high Expectations

62 Schools are Improving School Improvement

63 Schools are Improving School Improvement Changing World

64 Skills Gap

65 Schools are Improving School Improvement Changing World

66 School Improvement Changing World Schools are Improving

67 School Improvement Changing World Schools are Improving

68 Culture Drives Strategy

69 Technology

70 Image source: http://robota.dem.uc.pt/pda_control/pda2.JPG

71 19912011 Computing Capacity Moores Law – Doubles Every 2 Years

72 19912011 Computing Capacity Moores Law – Doubles Every 2 Years

73 Semantic Web Analyze Documents Analyze Documents Key words and headers (Google) Key words and headers (Google) Meaning / Concepts Meaning / Concepts Wolfram Alpha Wolfram Alpha Complete Task Complete Task

74 Implications Home Work Home Work Term Paper Term Paper

75 -Wolfram Alpha- -will search all language and give you response in your language -will search all language and give you response in your language -will respond in writing or verbally (in your language) -will respond in writing or verbally (in your language)

76 Cloud Computing Cloud Computing

77 Open Source Open Source

78 Skills Gap

79 Lexile Framework ® for Reading Study Summary of Text Lexile Measures 600 800 1000 1400 1600 1200 Text Lexile Measure (L) High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

80 Setting the Bar Reading = 1,300 for Graduation Need to Straighten the Bar K-1 N/A 2-3 450-790L 4-5 770-980L 6-8 955-1155L 9-10 1080-1305L 11-12 1215-1355L

81 Reading Requirements Findings Entry-level Entry-level Highest in 6/16 Highest in 6/16 Second Highest in 7/16 Second Highest in 7/16 Consistent Across Country Consistent Across Country

82 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Tennessee 88 % North Carolina 82 % Texas 81 % Iowa 77 % Florida 71 % Massachusetts 48 % California 48 %

83 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Tennessee 88 %170 North Carolina 82 %183 Texas 81 %190 Iowa 77 %197 Florida 71 %202 Massachusetts 48 %234 California 48 %210

84 Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 88 % Tennessee 87 % Iowa 72 % Florida 44 % California 39 % South Carolina 30 %

85 Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 88 %217 Tennessee 87 %222 Iowa 72 %250 Florida 44 %265 California 39 %262 South Carolina 30 %276

86 Global Competition

87 Equity Excellence

88 Financial

89

90 Demographics

91 Population FemaleMale 1950 2010 2050

92 Create a Culture What is the message What is the message Who it to deliver to and in what order Who it to deliver to and in what order How to deliver How to deliver

93 THE KEY Effective Instruction THE KEY Effective Instruction

94 19 th Annual Model Schools Conference June 26 – 29, 2011 www.ModelSchoolsConference.com

95 Successful Practices Network www.successfulpractices.org Provide Focused / Sustained Professional Development System Robust Online Teacher Support Resources Support Transition to CCSS Improving Instruction / Student Engagement Low Cost - Highly Effective Resources

96 1587 Route 146 Rexford, NY 12148 Phone (518) 399-2776 Fax (518) 399-7607 E-mail - info@LeaderEd.com www.LeaderEd.com International Center for Leadership in Education, Inc.


Download ppt "International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Next Three Years June 16,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google