Presentation on theme: "GM and Nike Issues: Should the dominant firm in the supply chain be responsible for the ethical conduct of its suppliers? Does GM’s gift policy do enough."— Presentation transcript:
GM and Nike Issues: Should the dominant firm in the supply chain be responsible for the ethical conduct of its suppliers? Does GM’s gift policy do enough to ensure ethical conduct? Can Nike’s environmentally sound policies mean that the firm should be allowed greater leeway in its labour practices?
Nike’s Environmental Policy Environment is a top priority at Nike Not limited to Nike facilities, but extended to manufacturing partners, suppliers, and material vendors Nike Environmental Action Team (NEAT) works with suppliers to bring facilities up to Nike standards Educational program for suppliers on environmental, legal, and labour issues Choose suppliers based on ability to meet Nike environmental standards
Should Nike be responsible for suppliers’ ethical conduct? Yes –Consumers can only “see” Nike, not nameless suppliers –Consumers buy Nike expecting Nike values at all stages of the manufacturing process –Ignoring ethical issues upstream in the supply chain would lead to lowest- cost outsourcing with severe ethical consequences No –Monitoring costs –Imposing mores and values across companies or cultures may be difficult or near impossible But –Ignoring ethical issues in the supply chain is likely to lead to business image problems, such as…
GM Gift Policy Goal: avoid appearance of influence by improper consideration, whether illegal bribes or legal favours or gifts. General policy: no GM employee should accept any gift, entertainment, or gratuity from any GM supplier or potential supplier. Exceptions: where refusing a gift may be against GM’s legitimate business interests, as in some gift-giving cultures, discretion may be used. Token and insignificant gifts such as logo pens or hats, may be acceptable. Employees should consult managers.
What is an acceptable gift? ?
Does GM’s Policy Do Enough To Ensure Ethical Conduct? Monitoring/enforcement procedures unclear/lacking No formal ethical training Consequences of violations unclear Gray areas around managerial discretion dangerous and open to individual interpretation – formal rules and procedures required
Can Nike’s environmentally sound policies mean that the firm should be allowed greater leeway in its labour practices? ? Obviously, no! Objections? Christopher?