Presentation on theme: "Atypical ductal hyperplasia “A diagnosis of ADH should not be made unless a diagnosis of low grade DCIS is being seriously considered” WHO Breast 2012."— Presentation transcript:
Atypical ductal hyperplasia “A diagnosis of ADH should not be made unless a diagnosis of low grade DCIS is being seriously considered” WHO Breast 2012 A matter of quantity Architecture: cribriform spaces, micropapillae (bulbous), rigid bars Cytology: ‘clonal’, monotonous, mild nuclear atypia, enlarged, nucleoli, distinct cell borders. Same as LG-DCIS
ADH/DCIS When does ADH become DCIS? A matter of quantity. Criteria still vary and are not standardized WHO states: > 2 mm and/or completely involving at least two duct spaces. Any intraductal proliferation with moderate-high grade nuclear features = DCIS (no size criteria). Sometimes ADH and UDH co-exist
IHC IHC : UDH vs ADH/DCIS CK5/6 and ER Caveat: Not helpful in columnar cell change or apocrine change.
Practical point If a core biopsy shows borderline features of ADH/DCIS, be conservative and call it ‘at least ADH’ An upgrade rate to DCIS on excision is well known and accepted. Harder to explain DCIS, limited to the core.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.