1. Report of the AWD compliance RG IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: 16-12-0003-00-000n Date Submitted: 2012-01-04 Source: Eldad Zeira, RapporteurVoice: InterDigitalE-mail: eldad.zeira@interdigital.comeldad.zeira@interdigital.com Venue: IEEE 802.16n at session #77 Abstract: This document is the report of the compliance RG Purpose: To present RG discussions and conclusions to the TG Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16. Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: and.http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3 Further information is located at and.http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.htmlhttp://standards.ieee.org/board/pat 1

2. IEEE C802.16n-11/0200 Report of the AWD compliance RG Eldad Zeira, Rapporteur InterDigital

3. IEEE C802.16n-11/200 Summary RG established after session #76 with charter to examine AWD compliance with the SRD with possibility of submitting comments against SRD. One CC held 12/12/2011 at 8pm US EST, Chaired by Eldad Attended: Eunkyung, Anh Tuan, Wai Leong Contribution 802.16n-11/0222, submitted at session #76 has been re-presented and discussed. –There was no objection to discussing it. No consensus has been achieved and the RG has no recommendations Additional CC’s were not seem necessary

4. IEEE C802.16n-11/200 Discussion points in brief Remedy 1: Anh Tuan prefers not to accept any of the options of remedy-1. He intends to bring contribution to Jan. meeting to add the necessary material for multi—hop operation under the SPOF immunity section. Eunkyung has agreed. Remedy 2: Wai Leong opposes remedy-2. Eldad expressed opinion that the requirement is redundant in the sense that it is complied with trivially; WL: not redundant as we decided that all RS functionality is performed by MS acting as one.