3Background Global market US stock exchanges make up approximately 40% of all marketsEmerging market developmentMarket capitalization and GDPEmerging markets are providing additional investment opportunities and may provide higher potential excess returns.Market cap and GDP are related, as countries grow and develop there is generally more need for equity financing. The relationship between market cap and GDP is loose however. More to the point here is that non U.S. market cap is growing in absolute terms and as a percent.2
4Stock Market Cap Developed Countries Look at growth of non U.S. markets. The major point here is that investing only in the U.S. omits an increasingly large and important part of the possible risky portfolio and sticking only to the U.S. is likely to lead to under diversification.The so called home country bias still exists.
5Stock Market Cap Emerging Markets The top four are the BRICs (Brazil, India, Russia and China) that are sometimes categorized separately from the rest as having more growth potential and political clout.China’s market grew by more the 3,000% between 2002 and Active strategies will want to include investments in these high growth countries.
6Per Capita GDP and Market Capitalization as a % of GDP Log Scale, 2003 2003 data
7Per Capita GDP and Market Capitalization as a % of GDP Log Scale, 2007 2007 data, Notice how the BRICs have moved up,The data for both these graphs is from Table 19.1
9Risks in International Investing What are the risks involved in investment in foreign securities?Exchange rate riskCountry specific risk3
10Exchange Rate RiskVariation in return related to changes in the relative value of the domestic and foreign currencyTotal Return is a function ofInvestment return &Change in the value of the foreign currency5
11Returns with Foreign Exchange r(US) = return on the foreign investment in US Dollars r(FM) = return on the foreign market in local currency E0 = original exchange rate E1 = subsequent exchange rate7
12Return Example: Dollar Depreciates Relative to the Pound If you invest in a British Security and earn 10%, find the return in US Dollars given: Initial Exchange rate : £ = $2.00 Final Exchange rate: £ = $2.10 Why is your return > 10%?The return is better because while you were invested in the pound, the pound increased in value 5%8
13Return Example: Dollar Appreciates Relative to the Pound If you invest in a British Security and earn 10%, find the return in US Dollars given: Initial Exchange rate : £ = $2.00 Final Exchange rate: £ = $1.85The return is poorer because while you were invested in the pound, the pound decreased in value 7.5%8
14Figure 19.2 Stock Market Returns in US Dollars and Local Currencies for 2007 Exchange rate movements have material affects on dollar returns in some countries
15Table 19.3 Rates of Change in the US Dollar Against Major World Currencies, 2003-2007(monthly data) Standard deviations indicate that currency risk is quite high. Exchange rate risk is roughly the same magnitude as the standard deviation of stocks. The point is that if you find an undervalued foreign security and invest in it, you should hedge out the exchange rate risk unless you also have a favorable foreign exchange forecast. Active managers should consider exchange rate risk.However the low correlations indicate that much exchange rate risk is diversifiable. Thus passive investors with well-diversified international portfolios need not be overly concerned with their foreign currency exposure, at least if you have a longer time horizon.
16The Carry TradeSuppose the yen LIBOR = 0.24% and U.S. $ LIBOR = 3.75%.An astute investor may borrow yen at the yen rate, convert the borrowed funds to dollars and invest at $ LIBOR.What can go wrong with this strategy?DefaultYen increases in value by 3.75% % = 3.51% or more.3.51% is an approximation because these transactions aren’t linear. The carry trade was profitable with the yen for several years but began to unwind when the yen started to rise as U.S. financial problems began and some investors fled to the yen for safety, driving up its value. The weakening of Japan’s economy in 2009 brought the yen back down.The term carry trade is not in the text.
17Covered Interest Arbitrage (1) U.S. interest rates are 6.15% and British interest rates are at 10% when the exchange rate is $2.00 / £. The one year forward exchange rate for the pound is $1.95/£.How can you earn a riskless arbitrage profit based on these quotes?Borrow $1 at 6.15%: Will owe $ in one yearConvert $1 to pounds: $1 / $2.00/£ = £0.50Invest £0.50 at 10%: Will yield £.50 x 1.10 = £0.55.Sell pound forward at $1.95: £55 x $1.95 = $1.0725Net: $ $ = $0.011 / dollarThis works because the currency % change is ($ $2.00) / $2.00 = -2.5% (pound depreciation) is not enough to offset the higher British interest rate. In doing so we gain 10% % = 3.85% on the interest rates and we lose on 2.5% on the currency depreciation. It is riskless if step 3 and 4can be done simultaneously.
18Covered Interest Arbitrage (2) U.S. interest rates are 6.15% and British interest rates are at 10% when the exchange rate is $2.00 / £. The one year forward exchange rate for the pound is $1.90/£.How can you earn a riskless arbitrage profit based on these quotes?Borrow £1 at 10%: Will owe £1.10 in one yearConvert £1 to $ at $2.00/£ = $2Invest $2 at 6.15%: Will yield $2 x =$2.123Buy pound forward at $1.90: Will cost £1.10 x $1.90 = $2.09Net profit = $ $2.09 = $0.033This works because the currency % change is ($ $2.00) / $2.00 = -5% (pound depreciation) is more than enough to offset the higher British interest rate so we borrow at the British rate and invest in the dollar. We lose 6.15% – 10% = 3.85% on the rates but we gain 5% in the drop in value of the pound.
19Covered Interest Parity The spot-futures exchange rate relationship that prevents arbitrage opportunities. If the interest rates and exchange rates are in this relationship no arbitrage is possible.The intuition here is that the difference in interest rates is just matched by the difference between the forward and spot rate so you can’t exploit the lower interest rate. If the U.S. rate is higher then F1 < E0 implying that the dollar is depreciating. The converse also holds.Covered interest parity does tend to hold because this is how banks set their forward rates.
20Other Risks in International Investing Imperfect exchange rate risk hedgingDifficult to hedge out equities with variable rates of returnCountry Specific RiskCompositionPoliticalUnfavorable regulations or rules changesTaxes on withdrawals, expropriation, repatriation restrictions, etc.4
21Other Risks in International Investing Country – Specific RiskCompositionMacro Financial RiskAbility to pay its debts, domestic and foreignEconomicGrowth rate, stability and vulnerabilitiesData availability problems can be severeComposite RatingsPolitical Risk Services (PRS) publishes the International Country Risk Guide and rates countries from 0 (most risky) to 100 (least risky)4
22Variables Used in the PRSs Political Risk Scores
2619.3 International Investing: Risk, Return, and Benefits From Diversification
27International Investment Choices Direct Stock PurchasesDifficult for individual investors due to currency and tax issues.Mutual FundsOpen EndWorld versus international fundsHigher expensesClosed EndCountry or regional fundsWEBSRecall that WEBS are ADRs on portfolios.14
28Questions on Assessing Performance in US Dollars in Foreign Markets Are emerging markets riskier?Attempt to answer this through the graphs that follow.
29Annualized Standard Deviation of Investments Across the Globe ($ returns) According to the standard deviation investments in emerging markets are generally riskier than in developed countries.
30Figure 19.4 Betas of country returns in $ If we are adding international investments to a well diversified portfolio it is beta that matters. Notice the imperfect correlation between standard deviation and beta. The evidence of lower betas indicates that there may be diversification benefits from including international investments into a U.S. portfolio.
31Questions on Assessing Performance in US Dollars in Foreign Markets Are average returns higher in emerging markets?
32Figure 19.5 Average $ excess returns 1999-2008 Emerging markets generally have higher excess returns. Since some had returns below the risk free rate we can reaffirm that risky returns may fall short of expectations over long time periods.Students may notice that many countries with lower beta had higher excess returns. This seems counterintuitive. Either the betas aren’t good risk measures or we simply don’t have enough data. The standard deviations are large enough to indicate a lot of variability in results can be expected over even a 10 year period.
33X-Section Country Monthly Return Stats This is for the whole sample of 49 countries but it is broken out different ways. The main findings are that beta and size are significant and the text indicates that investors pay more for securities in markets that have more transparency, enforcement of business law and better regulations. The World Bank published a similar finding about growth several years ago.Note that the correlation between country capitalization and SD is high so it may be difficult to say much about these coefficients.
34Questions on Assessing Performance in US Dollars in Foreign Markets Is exchange rate risk important in international portfolios?
35Standard Deviation of Investments Across the Globe in US Dollars versus Local Currency Local currency SDs are slightly lower than SDs of dollar returns, so there is only a small amount of exchange rate risk.
36Beta in $US versus Local Currency Betas are also only slightly lower for local currency returns. The reason for this is in the next slide.
37Correlation of Returns in $US and Local Currencies 1999 - 2008 Notice the nearly identical correlations of country returns with U.S. returns in U.S. dollars and in local currency returns.
38Avg. monthly returns in $ and local currency 1999-2008 In 1999 the dollar appears to have been overvalued since over the following 10 years, returns in local currency (which may be considered hedged returns so that the change in the value of the dollar did not affect performance) outperformed unhedged returns (returns when converted to U.S. dollars). The point is that hedging currency risk can materially affect returns, particularly if a currency is over or undervalued against many other currencies. The choice to hedge or not now becomes one of the decision variables for an active manager.
39Questions on Assessing Performance in US Dollars in Foreign Markets Are there diversification benefits to international investing?
40Diversification Benefits Evidence shows international diversification is beneficialPossible to expand the efficient frontier above domestic only frontierPossible to reduce the systematic risk level below the domestic only levelBut as we will see, the benefits are less than generally thought.11
41International Diversification International Diversification. Portfolio Diversification as a Percentage of the Average Standard Deviation of a One-Stock PortfolioDiversifying internationally eliminates about another 15% that is certainly economically material but this is from dated results.
42Hedged & Unhedged Correlations These correlations indicate that international diversification benefits will be significant and material. Note the negative correlations between bonds and stocks. This indicates that adding bonds to a portfolio will result in substantial diversification benefits.
43Ex Post Efficient Frontier of Country Portfolios 1999-2003 Unfortunately the authors did not update this graph. However it indicates the benefits of international investing.
44Figure 19.12a Efficient Frontier of Country Portfolios (world expected excess return = .3% per month)This graph indicates only modes benefits from international diversification from including developed markets.
45Figure 19.12b Efficient Frontier of Country Portfolios (world expected excess return = .6% per month)Changing the expected excess return in this way makes the slope of the CML larger because a higher excess return simply shifts the curve upward. This graph also indicates only modest benefits from international diversification from including developed markets.
46Are diversification benefits preserved in bear markets? There is an old saying that in a crash ,“All correlations go to 1.” If so then diversification fails just when you need it most. This was certainly true for the hedge fund Long Term Capital Management.
47Figure 19.13A Regional Indexes Around the Crash, October 14 – 26, 1987 We should note that this is from Richard Roll’s work. As you might expect, some events affect all stocks globally and you can’t diversify away from those factors. Some macro shocks such as the financial crisis of 2008 are likely to tank all stocks, though not all equally. Roll (1988) found that the beta of the country index on the world index predicted that index’s response to the ‘87 crash.
48Figure 19.13B Beta and of portfolios against deviation of month return from Sep-Dec 2008 from avgBoth beta against the U.S. and the country index standard deviation explain the deviation of crisis returns from the overall period averages. This largely confirms Roll’s predictions.
49ConclusionsA passive investment in all countries would not have lowered risk at all during the recent crisis.Hedging currencies has little effect either. A U.S. stock market crash appears to be a systemic factor that cannot be diversified away from in a crisis.Correlations are on the increase due to globalization, nevertheless we still expect modest international diversification benefits in normal markets.
5019.4 How to Go about International Diversification and the Benefit We Can Expect Choosing a Practical Internationally Diversified Portfolio
51 of various portfolios The U.S. only standard deviation (SD) of monthly returns is 4.81%. The minimum variance portfolio is to diversify into all countries and allows short sales. This yields a SD of 1.9%. Disallowing short sales, moves the SD to 3.44%, still quite low. The problem with this portfolio is that the U.S. comprises only 2% of it while risky countries like Malaysia and Sri Lanka comprise 31% of the portfolio! Nobody is going to invest that way, because we know it is too risky. The index portfolios consists mostly of large markets (44%) and Australia plus the Far East (18%). The two large markets added are Japan (31%) and China (16%). According to these results passive international diversification is less effective than generally thought.
52Active Management First level: Second level Security selection and asset allocation within each market to identify a country portfolio superior to country index.Second levelOptimize allocations across country portfolios to maximize diversification.The alphas and information ratios in Table 19.9B (next slide) indicate that even noisy forecasts of these variables may be able to generate portfolios with greatly superior performance.
53Monthly Returns & Performance for Index Portfolios 1999-2008 The alphas and information ratios in Table 19.9B indicate that even noisy forecasts of these variables may be able to generate portfolios with greatly superior performance.
5419.5 International Investing And Performance Attribution
55Performance Attribution The “Bogey” or benchmarkEAFE index (non-U.S. stocks)Currency SelectionContribution to performance due to currency movementsCountry SelectionContribution to performance due to choosing better performing countriesThe EAFE is the European, Australian, Far East index
56Performance Attribution Stock SelectionThis ability is measured as the weighted average of equity returns in excess of the equity index in each country.Cash / Bond SelectionExcess return due to weighting bonds and bills differently from benchmark weights.