Download presentation

1
**Briana B. Morrison Adapted from William Collins**

Hash Tables Briana B. Morrison Adapted from William Collins

2
Hashing

3
Hashing

4
**Sequential Search Given a vector of integers:**

What is the best case for sequential search? O(1) when value is the first element What is the worst case? O(n) when value is last element, or value is not in the list What is the average case? O(1/2 * n) which is O(n) Hashing

5
Hashing

6
Hashing

7
**Binary Search Given a vector of integers:**

What is the best case for binary search? O(1) when element is the middle element What is the worst case? O(log n) when element is first, last, or not in list What is the average case? O(log n) Hashing

8
Hashing

9
Hashing

10
Hashing

11
Hashing

12
Hashing

13
Hashing

14
Hashing

15
Hashing

16
Hashing

17
Hashing

18
Hashing

19
Hashing

20
Hashing

21
**Map vs. Hashmap What are the differences between a map and a hashmap?**

Interface Efficiency Applications Implementation Hashing

22
Hashing

23
Hashing

24
**array? vector? deque? heap? LINKED Linked? list? map? **

CONTIGUOUS array? vector? deque? heap? LINKED Linked? list? map? BUT NONE OF THESE WILL GIVE CONSTANT AVERAGE TIME FOR SEARCHES, INSERTIONS AND REMOVALS. Hashing

25
Hashing

26
Hashing

27
Hashing

28
Hashing

29
Hashing

30
Hashing

31
Hashing

32
**To make these values fit into the table, we need to mod by the table size; i.e., key % 1000.**

210 256 816 OOPS! Hashing

33
Hashing

34
Hashing

35
Hashing

36
**Hash Codes Suppose we have a table of size N A hash code is:**

A number in the range 0 to N-1 We compute the hash code from the key You can think of this as a “default position” when inserting, or a “position hint” when looking up A hash function is a way of computing a hash code Desire: The set of keys should spread evenly over the N values When two keys have the same hash code: collision Hashing

37
**Hash Functions A hash function should be quick and easy to compute.**

A hash function should achieve an even distribution of the keys that actually occur across the range of indices for both random and non-random data. Calculation should involve the entire search key. Hashing

38
**Examples of Hash Functions**

Usually involves taking the key, chopping it up, mix the pieces together in various ways Examples: Truncation – ignore part of key, use the remaining part as the index Folding – partition the key into several parts and combine the parts in a convenient way (adding, etc.) After calculating the index, use modular arithmetic. Divide by the size of the index range, and take the remainder as the result Hashing

39
Example Hash Function Hashing

40
**Devising Hash Functions**

Simple functions often produce many collisions ... but complex functions may not be good either! It is often an empirical process Adding letter values in a string: same hash for strings with same letters in different order Better approach: size_t hash = 0; for (size_t i = 0; i < s.size(); ++i) hash = hash * 31 + s[i]; Hashing

41
**Devising Hash Functions (2)**

The String hash is good in that: Every letter affects the value The order of the letters affects the value The values tend to be spread well over the integers Hashing

42
**Devising Hash Functions (3)**

Guidelines for good hash functions: Spread values evenly: as if “random” Cheap to compute Generally, number of possible values much greater than table size Hashing

43
**Hash Code Maps Memory address: Integer cast: Component sum:**

We reinterpret the memory address of the key object as an integer Good in general, except for numeric and string keys Integer cast: We reinterpret the bits of the key as an integer Suitable for keys of length less than or equal to the number of bits of the integer type (e.g., char, short, int and float on many machines) Component sum: We partition the bits of the key into components of fixed length (e.g., 16 or 32 bits) and we sum the components (ignoring overflows) Suitable for numeric keys of fixed length greater than or equal to the number of bits of the integer type (e.g., long and double on many machines) Hashing

44
**Hash Code Maps (cont.) Polynomial accumulation:**

We partition the bits of the key into a sequence of components of fixed length (e.g., 8, 16 or 32 bits) a0 a1 … an-1 We evaluate the polynomial p(z) = a0 + a1 z + a2 z2 + … … + an-1zn-1 at a fixed value z, ignoring overflows Especially suitable for strings (e.g., the choice z = 33 gives at most 6 collisions on a set of 50,000 English words) Polynomial p(z) can be evaluated in O(n) time using Horner’s rule: The following polynomials are successively computed, each from the previous one in O(1) time p0(z) = an-1 pi (z) = an-i-1 + zpi-1(z) (i = 1, 2, …, n -1) We have p(z) = pn-1(z) Hashing

45
Hashing

46
Hashing

47
Hashing

48
Hashing

49
Hashing

50
Hashing

51
Hashing

52
Hashing

53
Hashing

54
Hashing

55
Hashing

56
Hashing

57
Hashing

58
Hashing

59
Hashing

60
**Collision Handlers NOW WE’LL LOOK AT SPECIFIC COLLISION HANDLERS:**

Chaining Linear Probing (Open Addressing) Double Hashing Quadratic Hashing Hashing

61
Collision Handling Collisions occur when different elements are mapped to the same cell Chaining: let each cell in the table point to a linked list of elements that map there 1 2 3 4 Chaining is simple, but requires additional memory outside the table Hashing

62
Hashing

63
Hashing

64
**Chaining with Separate Lists Example**

Hashing

65
**Chaining Picture Two items hashed to bucket 3**

Three items hashed to bucket 4 Hashing

66
Hashing

67
Hashing

68
**averageTimeS(n, m) n / 2m iterations. <= 0.75 / 2 **

FOR THE find METHOD, averageTimeS(n, m) n / 2m iterations. <= 0.75 / 2 SO averageTimeS(n, m) <= A CONSTANT. averageTimeS(n, m) IS CONSTANT. Hashing

69
Hashing

70
Hashing

71
Hashing

72
Hashing

73
Hashing

74
Hashing

75
**Hash Table Using Open Probe Addressing Example**

Insert 45 (mod by table size … % 11) Hashing

76
**Hash Table Using Open Probe Addressing Example**

Insert 35 Hashing

77
**Hash Table Using Open Probe Addressing Example**

Insert 76 Hashing

78
**Hash Table Using Open Probe Addressing Example**

Hashing

79
Linear Probing Open addressing: the colliding item is placed in a different cell of the table Linear probing handles collisions by placing the colliding item in the next (circularly) available table cell Each table cell inspected is referred to as a “probe” Colliding items lump together, causing future collisions to cause a longer sequence of probes Example: h(x) = x mod 13 Insert keys 18, 41, 22, 44, 59, 32, 31, 73, in this order 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 41 18 44 59 32 22 31 73 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Hashing

80
**WE NEED TO KNOW WHEN A SLOT IS FULL OR OCCUPIED. HOW? **

INSTEAD OF JUST T() STORED IN THE BUCKETS (BECAUSE T() COULD BE A VALID VALUE), THE BUCKET WILL STORE AN INSTANCE OF THE VALUE_TYPE CLASS. Hashing

81
Hashing

82
Hashing

83
**Retrieve What about when we want to retrieve?**

Consider the previous example…. Hashing

84
**Hash Table Using Open Probe Addressing Example**

Find the value 35. (% 11) Now find the value 76. Now find the value 33. Hashing

85
**Hash Table Using Open Probe Addressing Example**

Now delete 35. (% 11) Now find the value 76. Now find the value 33. Hashing

86
**Linear Probing Probe by incrementing the index**

If “fall off end”, wrap around to the beginning Take care not to cycle forever! Compute index as hash_fcn() % table.size() if table[index] == NULL, item is not in the table if table[index] matches item, found item (done) Increment index circularly and go to 2 Why must we probe repeatedly? hashCode may produce collisions remainder by table.size may produce collisions Hashing

87
**Search Termination Ways to obtain proper termination**

Stop when you come back to your starting point Stop after probing N slots, where N is table size Stop when you reach the bottom the second time Ensure table never full Reallocate when occupancy exceeds threshold Hashing

88
Hashing

89
Erase value 1069. false Hashing

90
Now search for 460. Hashing

91
Hashing

92
**insert SETS marked_for_removal TO false; **

SOLUTION: bool marked_for_removal; THE CONSTRUCTOR FOR VALUE_TYPE SETS EACH bucket’s marked_for_removal FIELD TO false. insert SETS marked_for_removal TO false; erase SETS marked_for_removal TO true. SO AFTER THE INSERTIONS: Hashing

93
Hashing

94
Hashing

95
Hashing

96
Hashing

97
**CLUSTER: A SEQUENCE OF NON-EMPTY LOCATIONS**

KEYS THAT HASH TO 54 FOLLOW THE SAME COLLISION-PATH AS KEYS THAT HASH TO 55, … Hashing

98
Hashing

99
Hashing

100
**SOLUTION 1: DOUBLE HASHING, THAT IS, OBTAIN BOTH INDICES **

AND OFFSETS BY HASHING: unsigned long hash_int = hash (key); int index = hash_int % length, offset = hash_int / length; NOW THE OFFSET DEPENDS ON THE KEY, SO DIFFERENT KEYS WILL USUALLY HAVE DIFFERENT OFFSETS, SO NO MORE PRIMARY CLUSTERING! Secondary hash function Hashing

101
TO GET A NEW INDEX: index = (index + offset) % length; Notice that if a collision occurs, you rehash from the NEW index value. Hashing

102
**WHERE WOULD THESE KEYS GO IN buckets?**

EXAMPLE: length = 11 key index offset WHERE WOULD THESE KEYS GO IN buckets? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Hashing

103
index key 0 47 1 2 35 3 58 4 15 5 16 6 7 27 8 19 9 10 30 Hashing

104
**PROBLEM: WHAT IF OFFSET IS A MULTIPLE OF length? EXAMPLE: length = 11 **

key index offset // BUT 15 IS AT INDEX 4 // FOR KEY 246, NEW INDEX = (4 + 22) % 11 = 4. OOPS! 47 1 2 35 3 58 4 15 5 16 6 7 27 8 19 9 10 Hashing

105
**ON AVERAGE, offset % length WILL EQUAL 0 ONLY ONCE IN EVERY **

SOLUTION: if (offset % length == 0) offset = 1; ON AVERAGE, offset % length WILL EQUAL 0 ONLY ONCE IN EVERY length TIMES. Hashing

106
**FINAL PROBLEM: WHAT IF length HAS SEVERAL FACTORS?**

EXAMPLE: length = 20 key index offset // BUT 30 IS AT INDEX 10 FOR KEY 110, NEW INDEX = (10 + 5) % 20 = 15, WHICH IS OCCUPIED, SO NEW INDEX = (15 + 5) % 20, WHICH IS OCCUPIED, SO NEW INDEX = ... Hashing

107
**SOLUTION: MAKE length A PRIME.**

Hashing

108
**Example of Double Hashing**

Consider a hash table storing integer keys that handles collision with double hashing N = 13 h(k) = k mod 13 d(k) = 7 - k mod 7 Insert keys 18, 41, 22, 44, 59, 32, 31, 73, in this order 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 31 41 18 32 59 73 22 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Hashing

109
Hashing

110
**Notice that h stays at the same location. No clustering.**

ANOTHER SOLUTION: QUADRATIC HASHING, THAT IS, ONCE COLLISION OCCURS AT h, GO TO LOCATION h + 1, THEN IF COLLISION OCCURS THERE GO TO LOCATION h + 4, then h + 9, then h + 16, etc. unsigned long hash_int = hash (key); int index = hash_int % length, offset = i2; Notice that h stays at the same location. No clustering. Hashing

111
**QUADRATIC REHASHING EXAMPLE: length = 11 key index offset 15 4 19 8**

19 8 16 5 58 3 , final place index = 6 35 2 , final place index = 9 , final place index = 7 1 2 3 58 4 15 5 16 6 7 8 19 9 10 Hashing

112
**Performance HOW DOES DOUBLE-HASHING COMPARE WITH CHAINED HASHING?**

113
**Performance of Hash Tables**

Load factor = # filled cells / table size Between 0 and 1 Load factor has greatest effect on performance Lower load factor better performance Reduce collisions in sparsely populated tables Knuth gives expected # probes p for open addressing, linear probing, load factor L: p = ½(1 + 1/(1-L)) As L approaches 1, this zooms up For chaining, p = 1 + (L/2) Note: Here L can be greater than 1! Hashing

114
**Performance of Hash Tables (2)**

Hashing

115
**Performance of Hash Tables (3)**

Insert: average O(1) Search: average O(1) Sorted array: Insert: average O(n) Search: average O(log n) Binary Search Tree: Insert: average O(log n) But balanced trees can guarantee O(log n) Hashing

116
**We know that hashing becomes inefficient as the table fills up**

We know that hashing becomes inefficient as the table fills up. What to do? EXPAND! Hashing

117
Hashing

118
Hashing

119
Hashing

120
**Key for Hashing In Class Work**

Open Addr Double (Re-hashing) Chaining 26, , 33, , , Hashing

121
**§- Hash Table Summary Slide 1**

- simulates the fastest searching technique, knowing the index of the required value in a vector and array and apply the index to access the value, by applying a hash function that converts the data to an integer - After obtaining an index by dividing the value from the hash function by the table size and taking the remainder, access the table. Normally, the number of elements in the table is much smaller than the number of distinct data values, so collisions occur. - To handle collisions, we must place a value that collides with an existing table element into the table in such a way that we can efficiently access it later. Hashing 121

122
**§- Hash Table (Cont…) Summary Slide 2**

- average running time for a search of a hash table is O(1) - the worst case is O(n) Hashing 122

123
**§- Collision Resolution**

Summary Slide 3 §- Collision Resolution - Types: 1) linear open probe addressing - the table is a vector or array of static size - After using the hash function to compute a table index, look up the entry in the table. - If the values match, perform an update if necessary. - If the table entry is empty, insert the value in the table. Hashing 123

124
**§- Collision Resolution (Cont…)**

Summary Slide 4 §- Collision Resolution (Cont…) - Types: 1) linear open probe addressing - Otherwise, probe forward circularly, looking for a match or an empty table slot. - If the probe returns to the original starting point, the table is full. - you can search table items that hashed to different table locations. - Deleting an item difficult. Hashing 124

125
**§- Collision Resolution (Cont…)**

Summary Slide 5 §- Collision Resolution (Cont…) 2) chaining with separate lists. - the hash table is a vector of list objects - Each list is a sequence of colliding items. - After applying the hash function to compute the table index, search the list for the data value. - If it is found, update its value; otherwise, insert the value at the back of the list. - you search only items that collided at the same table location Hashing 125

126
**§- Collision Resolution (Cont…)**

Summary Slide 6 §- Collision Resolution (Cont…) - there is no limitation on the number of values in the table, and deleting an item from the table involves only erasing it from its corresponding list Hashing 126

Similar presentations

OK

12 October, 2014 St Joseph's College ADVANCED HIGHER REVISION 1 ADVANCED HIGHER MATHS REVISION AND FORMULAE UNIT 2.

12 October, 2014 St Joseph's College ADVANCED HIGHER REVISION 1 ADVANCED HIGHER MATHS REVISION AND FORMULAE UNIT 2.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google