Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byShayna Ghrist Modified over 3 years ago

1
**Model-based PID tuning methods Two degree of freedom controllers **

PID Controller Tuning Introduction Model-based PID tuning methods Two degree of freedom controllers On-line PID controller tuning PID tuning guidelines and troubleshooting Simulink example

2
**Introduction PID control law Transfer function Controller tuning**

Need to select PID parameters (Kc, tI, tD) that yield “good” closed-loop response to disturbances and setpoint changes Only know: KKc > 0, tI > 0, tD >0 Trial-and-error tuning difficult and time consuming Need methods to determine good initial parameter values Refine parameter values by trial-and error fine tuning

3
**Impact of Controller Tuning**

4
**Closed-Loop Performance Criteria**

Stability of closed-loop system Minimization of disturbance effects Rapid, smooth tracking of setpoint changes Elimination of steady-state offset Avoidance of excessive control action Robustness to changes in process conditions Robustness to errors in process model

5
**Model-Based PID Controller Tuning**

Often based on first-order-plus-time-delay model Integral error criteria

6
ITAE Tuning Rules

7
General Trends The controller gain (Kc) is inversely proportional to the process gain (K). Kc decreases as the ratio of the time delay (q) and the dominant process time (t) constant increases. Both the integral time (tI) and the derivative time (tD) increase as q/t increases. A reasonable initial guess for the derivative mode is tD = 0.25tI. Kc decreases as integral control is added to a proportional controller. Kc increases as derivative control is added to a PI controller.

8
**ITAE Controller Tuning Example**

Process model ITAE tuning for disturbance (more aggressive) ITAE tuning for setpoint (less aggressive)

9
**Two Degree of Freedom Controllers**

Seek to tune the setpoint tracking response independent of the disturbance rejection response Setpoint filtering Controller operates on Y*sp instead of Ysp Tuning parameter tf determines speed of response Setpoint weighting Tuning parameter b determines speed of response

10
**On-Line PID Controller Tuning**

Often a process model is not available for controller tuning Need to determine tuning parameters directly from plant data Continuous cycling method Utilizing a proportional controller, find the Kc value that produces sustained oscillations. This is the ultimate gain Kcu. Determine the period of the sustained oscillations. This is the ultimate period Pu. Kc and Pu can also be found from an available transfer function model by direct substitution.

11
**Tuning Rules Based on Ultimate Gain**

12
**Shortcomings of Continuous Cycling Method**

Time consuming for processes with large time constants Process pushed to stability limit Ultimate gain does not exist for first- and second-order systems without time delays Generally not applicable to integrating and open-loop unstable systems because stability is achieved only for intermediate Kc values First two shortcomings can be overcome using relay autotuning method to determine Kc and Pu (see text)

13
Step Test Method Model structure

14
**Step Test Method cont. Model structure Calculation of q and t**

Determine times when output has reached 35.3% (t35) and 85.3% (t85) Calculate q and t Then use tuning method for FOTPD models

15
**Shortcomings of Step Test Method**

Experimental test performed under open-loop conditions Method is not applicable to open-loop unstable processes Step response can be sensitive to the direction and magnitude of the step change if the process is nonlinear

16
**Guidelines for Common Control Loops**

Flow rate control – aggressively tuned PI controller due to fast dynamics and few disturbances Liquid level control – conservatively tuned P or PI controller depending on whether offset-free performance is required Gas pressure control – moderately tuned PI controller with little integral action due to small time constants and stability concerns Temperature control – PID controllers with application dependent tuning Composition control – PID or more advanced controller due to sampling delay and measurement noise

17
**Troubleshooting Control Loops**

Surveys indicate that as many as 35% of industrial controllers are placed in manual at any given time Determine if control problem is attributable to: Transducer – degradation or complete failure Controller – poor tuning or inadequate design Final control element – control valve stiction Process – change in operating condition Troubleshooting procedure Collect data on control system performance Determine if operating conditions have changed Check individual control system components Retune or redesign the controller

18
**Simulink Example: continuous_cycling.mdl**

19
**Determining the Ultimate Gain**

20
**PID Controller Tuning Kc = 7.88, Pu = 11.66**

Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on turbo generators manufacturers Ppt on peak load pricing lecture Ppt on time management in classroom Ppt on fire fighting training Ppt on 555 timer monostable Ppt on low level language in computer Ppt on microsoft sharepoint 2010 Ppt on earth movements and major landforms in australia Free ppt on parts of a flower Ppt on municipal corporation of delhi