Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byEbony Worthley Modified over 3 years ago

1
1 ChE / MET 433 4 Apr 12

2
Feedback Controller Tuning: (General Approaches) 1)Simple criteria; i.e QAD via ZN I, t r, etc easy, simple, do on existing process multiple solutions 2)Time integral performance criteria ISEintegral square error IAEintegral absolute value error ITAEintegral time weighted average error 3)Semi-empirical rules FOPDT (ZN II) Cohen-Coon 4)ATV, or Autotuning 5)Trial and error 6)Rules of thumb 2

3
Select the tuning criterion for the control loop. Apply filtering to the sensor reading Determine if the control system is fast or slow responding. –For fast responding, field tune (trail-and-error) –For slow responding, apply ATV-based tuning Trial and Error (field tuning)* * J.B. Riggs, & M.N. Karim Chemical and Bio-Process Control, 3 rd ed. (2006) 3 Turn off integral and derivative action. Make initial estimate of K c based on process knowledge. Using setpoint changes, increase K c until tuning criterion is met

4
Decrease K c by 10%. Make initial estimate of I (i.e., I =5 p ). Reduce I until offset is eliminated Check that proper amount of K c and I are used. 4 Trial and Error (field tuning)* * J.B. Riggs, & M.N. Karim Chemical and Bio-Process Control, 3 rd ed. (2006)

5
Kc I 5 K c and I levels good?

6
Feedback Controller Tuning: (General Approaches) 1)Simple criteria; i.e QAD via ZN I, t r, etc easy, simple, do on existing process multiple solutions 2)Time integral performance criteria ISEintegral square error IAEintegral absolute value error ITAEintegral time weighted average error 3)Semi-empirical rules FOPDT (ZN II) Cohen-Coon 4)ATV, or Autotuning 5)Trial and error 6)Rules of thumb 6

7
7 Rules of Thumb Flow Loops: typically PI controllers; PB ~ 150; Level Loops: PI for tight control; P for multiple tanks in series; Pressure Loops: can be fast or slow (like P control by controlling condenser) Temperature Loops: typically moderately slow; typically might use PID controller; PB fairly low (depends on gains); integral time on order of process time constant, with faster process derivative time ~ ¼ the process time constant. * D.A.Coggan, ed., Fundamentals of Industrial Control, 2 nd ed., ISA, NC (2005) * ** W.L.Luyben, Process Modeling, Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers, 2 nd ed., McGraw-Hill (1990) **

8
8 Higher Order Process

9
Feedback Controller Tuning: (General Approaches) 1)Simple criteria; i.e QAD via ZN I, t r, etc easy, simple, do on existing process multiple solutions 2)Time integral performance criteria ISEintegral square error IAEintegral absolute value error ITAEintegral time weighted average error 3)Semi-empirical rules FOPDT (ZN II) Cohen-Coon 4)ATV, or Autotuning 5)Trial and error 6)Rules of thumb 9

10
Feedback Control Design Disturbances: Load Setpoint Questions: Type of controller to use? How select best adjustable parameters? Performance criteria? Guidelines: Define performance. Obtain best parameters, for Select controller with best performance. 10

11
Feed Back Control PID controllers Proportional: Accelerates response Offset Integral: Eliminates offset Sluggish responses If increase Kc, more oscillations -> unstable? Derivative: Anticipates future error Stabilizing effect Noise problem Controller with best performance. P – only if can PI – eliminate offset PID – speed up response of sluggish systems (T, comp, control; multi-capacity systems) 11

12
Examples: 12

13
13

14
14

15
15

16
16

17
17 Controllers: P-Only: P-I Controller: P-I-D Controller: Derivative (rate) time [=] time Chapter 5 ~ p 183

18
18 Derivative Action: P-I-D Controller: t A t A

19
19 Derivative Action: Another potential problem: noise t A

20
Derivative action: PID Reduces overshoot Reduces oscillations Recommended for slow/sluggish processes (speed up control) Advantages: Susceptible to noise Filtering (or averaging PV) introduces delay 3 rd tuning parameter Disadvantages: 20

21
PID Control PID Tuning Tune for PI Derivative: Add in D Minimum response time D initial = Tu/8 Adjust Kc and I by same factor (%) Check response has correct level of integral action 21 PS: Try PID for HE process on Loop Pro Developer

22
22 Rules of Thumb Flow Loops: typically PI controllers; PB ~ 150; Level Loops: PI for tight control; P for multiple tanks in series; Pressure Loops: can be fast or slow (like P control by controlling condenser) Temperature Loops: typically moderately slow; typically might use PID controller; PB fairly low (depends on gains); integral time on order of process time constant, with faster process derivative time ~ ¼ the process time constant. * D.A.Coggan, ed., Fundamentals of Industrial Control, 2 nd ed., ISA, NC (2005) * ** W.L.Luyben, Process Modeling, Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers, 2 nd ed., McGraw-Hill (1990) **

23
23 ChE / MET 433

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on history of olympics games Ppt on different types of soil found in india Ppt on different occupations in nursing Ppt on environmental awareness Ppt on national stock exchange in india Ppt on general etiquettes Ppt on preservation methods of food Ppt on road accidents in pakistan Ppt on spices industry Ppt on chromosomes and chromatin