1. © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Comparison of the execution time of Manual Attendance and Attendance Management System
Student
Manual Attendance
Attendance System 1
22.78
3.81 2
12.82
3.43 3
19.65
4.12 4
11.38
3.63 5
12.65
2.53 6
16.24
2..49 7
14.66
2.72 8
15.23
3.35 9
15.03
4.01 10
16.31
4.21 11
14.97
4.31 12
15.16
3.85 13
15.18
4.32 14
16.54
4.78 15
16.59
4.23 16
16.92
3.55 17
16.95
4.34 18
17.61
5.11 19
17.72
3.36 20
17.78
4.57 21
18.01
3.12 22
18.25
3.31 23
18.62
3.1 24
19.19
2.92 25
19.34
2.83 26
19.67
4.47 27
19.72
5.05 28
19.85
3.34 29
19.89
3.42 30
20.52 31
20.91
4.92 32
22.03
3.58 33
23.16 34
23.19
5.19 35
24.21
5.52 36
10.68
3.72 37
15.37
4.33 38
15.68 39
11.92
4.87 40
19.23
3.53 41
20.86
2.12 42
14.17
2.34 43
17.75
3.89 44
15.99
3.75 45
27.69 46
25.39
2.38 47
24.46
2.41 48
19.87
4.11 49
15.24
3.08 50
20.05
2.98 51
17.45
3.67 52
13.67
3.52 53
21.15
3.71 54
19.08
4.05 55
14.44
5.00 56
3.97 57
19.9
2.56 58
15.28
3.45 59
12.76 60
23.75
3.54 61
12.34 62
15.43
4.07 63
17.32
4.93 64
4.91 65
14.89 66
17.6
3.99 67
16.43
4.04 68
18.75
5.14 69
19.32 70
19.3
3.79 71
3.62 72
18.92
2.87 73
4.52 74
17.41
4.09 75
18.43
4.26 76
18.52 77
19.8 78
15.87 79
19.42 80
17.62
O. Shoewu et al. Biometric-based Attendance System: LASU Epe Campus as Case Study. American Journal of Computing Research Repository, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, doi: /ajcrr-2-1-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.