Presentation on theme: "Mass Communication, Propaganda, & Persuasion"— Presentation transcript:
1Mass Communication, Propaganda, & Persuasion Chapter Three
2Mass Communication, Propaganda, & Persuasion We live in an age of mass communication.Did not begin with the InternetExamples: Roots (1977); The Day After (1983)Both had a major impact on most Americans.Examples: OJ Simpson trial, September 11th
3Mass Communication, Propaganda, & Persuasion We live in an age of mass persuasion.Aim is most obvious in advertising but influence through the mass media need not be so blatant.May be subtle or even unintentional.Example: Rodney King coverage
4Mass Communication, Propaganda, & Persuasion Given the power of TV newscasts, it is reasonable to ask what factors determine which news items are selected for coverage.One factor: Need to attract viewersTV news is a form of “entertainment.”News telecasts tend to focus on the violent behavior of individuals because action is more exciting than peaceful, orderly behavior.This is not a balanced picture of the world.
5Mass Communication, Propaganda, & Persuasion While media exposure keeps us informed, there is a downside to such exposure.Repeated visual imagery shapes attitudes and opinions.
6Media ContagionThe power of the media is best illustrated by a phenomenon known as emotional contagion.Example: Tylenol/cyanide scare (1982)False alarms outnumbered actual cases of product tampering by seven to one.Example: Suicide contagion (Phillips)The more coverage devoted by major television networks to suicide, the greater the subsequent increase.
7Media ContagionThis influence is probably unintentional but the pervasiveness of the electronic media cannot be overstated.Sometimes, the role of the media in reporting an event becomes more newsworthy than the event itself.Example: Beirut Hostage Crisis of 1985
8Politicians as Entertainers There is also a conscious, direct attempt to persuade people by the judicious selection of material to be presented in the media.Example: Political candidatesContemporary candidates must look good on television if they are to stand a chance of winning the election.
9Effectiveness of Media Appeals How credible and effective are obvious attempts to package and sell products through the mass media?Prima facie evidence = extremely effectiveExample: Over 90% of preschool children asked for toys or food they saw advertised on television.
10Effectiveness of Media Appeals Most children do “catch on” after a time.The resulting skepticism continues and is seen in the overwhelming majority of adults.The more educated the person, the greater the skepticism.BUT…we tend to believe (falsely) that our skepticism makes us immune to influence from the message.
11Effectiveness of Media Appeals Zajonc’s work shows that, all things being equal, more familiarity with a product (from aspirin to political candidates) may make a huge difference.The more familiar, the more attractive!Example: Grush, et al. found that, by and large, the congressional candidates who spent the most money typically received the most votes.
12Education or Propaganda? What is the difference between propaganda and education?Propaganda = Systematic propagation of a given doctrineEducation = Act of imparting knowledge or skillDistinguishing between the two can be subtle and difficult!Example: Zimbardo, Ebbesen, & Maslach examples of arithmetic problems in textbooks
13Education or Propaganda? In practice, whether a person regards a particular course of instruction as education or progandistic depends, to a large extent, on his or her values.Either way, persuasion is a reality that we should try to understand.
14PersuasionPetty & Cacioppo argue that there are two major routes to persuasion:Central routeInvolves weighing arguments and considering relevant facts and figures, thinking about issues in a systematic fashion and coming to a decisionPeripheral routeDecision based on simple, often irrelevant cues that suggest the rightness, wrongness, or attractiveness of an argument without giving it much thought
15Persuasion Few persuasive appeals are purely central or peripheral. Most contain elements aimed at both routesExample: Mac vs. PC commercialsExample: “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”Anecdote supported by McGlone’s research on rhymingExample: Political campaigns (e.g., “estate” vs. “death” tax)
16PersuasionWhat key factors can increase the effectiveness of a communication?Its sourceIts natureAudience characteristics
17The Source of the Communication: Credibility Speculations about the effect of prestige on persuasion are ancient.Example: Aristotle, “We believe good men fully and more readily than others…”Rigorous scientific tests of such effects are more recent.Example: Hovland & Weiss research on varying levels of credibilityBeing credible is characterized as being expert and trustworthy.
18The Source of the Communication: Credibility Determinations of credibility vary across individuals.Example: Aronson & Golden research on credibility and raceTo the effect that extraneous factors (such as skin color) decrease or increase your susceptibility to persuasion, your behavior is maladaptive.
19The Source of the Communication: Increasing Trustworthiness Trust is an important factor in determining whether or not a communicator will be effective.How might communicators make themselves seem more trustworthy?Argue against their own self-interestExample: Aronson, Walster, & Abrahams research with Joe “The Shoulder” NapolitanoExample: Eagly & colleagues on message vs. expectation
20The Source of the Communication: Increasing Trustworthiness How else might communicators make themselves seem more trustworthy?Convince the audience that they are not trying to influence them.Example: “When E.F. Hutton talks…”Example: Walster & Festinger research on overheard conversations
21The Source of the Communication: Attractiveness A crucial factor in determining the effectiveness of communicators is how attractive or likable they are.This is true regardless of their overall expertise or trustworthiness.Example: Mills & Aronson laboratory experiment with beautiful womanIt appears we associate the attractiveness of the communicator with the desirability of the message.Accordingly, the more the communicator wants to change our opinions, the more we change them – but only about trivial issues.
22The Nature of the Communication There are several ways in which communications can differ from one another:Logical vs. Emotional AppealsConsensual Statistical Evidence vs. a Single Personal ExampleOne-Sided vs. Two-Sided ArgumentsThe Order of PresentationThe Size of the Discrepancy
23The Nature of the Communication: Logical vs. Emotional Appeals There is some evidence favoring an appeal that is primarily emotional.Example: Hartmann study of political candidatesOne issue with research in this area is that there are no foolproof, mutually exclusive definitions of emotional and rational.
24The Nature of the Communication: Logical vs. Emotional Appeals Additional research also examines the effect of various levels of a specific emotion on opinion change.Overwhelming experimental data suggests that the more frightened a person is by a communication, the more likely he or she is to take positive preventative action.Example: Work by Leventhal, et al.Further research (also by Leventhal, et al.) shows that taking action also is related to self-esteem.One needs to tailor the communication to the audience.
25The Nature of the Communication: Logical vs. Emotional Appeals Fear-arousing appeals accompanied by specific instructions for appropriate action can and do produce recommended behaviors.The impact of fear appeals is context-specific.Example: AIDS fear and condom use
26The Nature of the Communication: Logical vs. Emotional Appeals Fear and the Threat of TerrorismAny warning becomes ineffective if it is vague about what the danger is or where it is coming from or what people can do to avert the danger.In the case of US government officials, the behavior has been not only inept, it has been detrimental.
27The Nature of the Communication: Statistical Evidence vs The Nature of the Communication: Statistical Evidence vs. Personal ExampleResearch by Nisbett and his associates indicates that single, personal examples – because of their vividness – assume far more importance than their logical statistical status would imply.Example: Consumer Reports vs. Friend with “lemon”The more vivid the example, the greater the persuasive power.Example: Aronson & students & energy conservation
28The Nature of the Communication: One-Sided vs. Two-Sided Arguments There is no simple relationship between one-sided arguments and the effectiveness of the communication.It depends, to some extent, upon how well informed the audience is.Another factor is the initial position of the audience.Example: Political speeches
29The Nature of the Communication: The Order of Presentation The issue of order of presentation is a complex one involving both learning and retention.Primacy effect: All things being equal, the first argument will be more effective.Recency effect: All other things being equal, the last argument will be more effective.
30The Nature of the Communication: The Order of Presentation The crucial variable is TIME:The amount between the first and second communicationThe amount between the end of the second communication and the moment the audience must make a decision
31The Nature of the Communication: The Order of Presentation The crucial variable is TIME:Inhibition (interference) is greatest if very little time elapses between the two communications.First communication interferes with learning of the second = primacy effectRetention is greatest when the audience must make up its mind immediately after hearing the second communication.Recency effects will prevailExample: Miller & Campbell simulated jury studyOur court system gives the prosecution the advantage of BOTH primacy and recency effects!
32The Nature of the Communication: The Size of the Discrepancy What is the most effective level of discrepancy between the opinion of the audience and the recommendation of the communicator?One line of reasoning suggests that the communicator should argue his or her most extreme position, relying on cognitive dissonance factors to induce opinion change.Example: Zimbardo research on discrepancies between friends
33The Nature of the Communication: The Size of the Discrepancy Another line of research disconfirms evidence suggesting the extreme position is more effective.Example: Whittaker’s curvilinear relationshipExample: Hovland, Harvey, & Sherif’s research on “latitude of acceptance”
34The Nature of the Communication: The Size of the Discrepancy The conflicting findings on this question suggest that there is a significant factor that hasn’t been accounted for – a great scientific opportunity to play detective!Example: Aronson, Turner, & Carlsmith speculation about (and later research on) the impact of communicator credibility
35The Nature of the Communication: The Size of the Discrepancy To summarize:When a communicator has high credibility, the greater the discrepancy between the view he or she advocates and the view of the audience, the more the audience will be persuaded.On the other hand, when a communicator’s credibility is doubtful or slim, he or she will produce maximum opinion change with moderate discrepancy.
36Characteristics of the Audience: Self-Esteem The one personality variable most consistently related to persuasibility is self-esteem.Individuals who feel inadequate are more easily influenced by a persuasive communication than individuals who think highly of themselves.
37Characteristics of the Audience: Prior Experience Another factor, of considerable importance, is the frame of mind of the audience.Positive impact:Example: Janis and associates research on desirable food and persuasive communicationExample: Petty & colleagues and good moodNegative impact:Example: Freedman & Sears research on forewarningExample: Brehm’s theory of reactanceBensley & Wu findings on “freedom of choice”Heilman’s study of petition-signers
38Characteristics of the Audience: Prior Experience How can we help people to resist attempts to influence them?Example: Work by McGuire, et al. on the “inoculation effect”The person easiest to brainwash is the person whose beliefs are based on slogans that have never been seriously challenged.
39How Well Do the Principles Work? Changing opinions is not as easy as it may appear.Canon found that, as one’s confidence is weakening, a person becomes less prone to listen to arguments against his or her beliefs.The very people you most want to convince, and those whose opinions might be the most susceptible to change, are the ones least likely to continue to expose themselves to a communication designed for that purpose.
40How Well Do the Principles Work? On the other hand, when used properly, these principles are quite effective.So effective, in fact, that one may question if their use is ethical.As such, it is essential to understand persuasion tactics, recognize when they are being used, and question their abuse.Especially at issue? Television!
41How Well Do the Principles Work? Issue of television:“From 8 to 11 o’clock each night, television is one long lie” and people believe the lie.Example: Depictions of race, sex/gender, violenceExample: Depictions of crime and punishment
42How Well Do the Principles Work? Most of our beliefs develop gradually, through repeated contacts with people and information over an extended period of time.In general, it is difficult to change important beliefs through direct communication.One issue: Opinion of triviality of the issue
43How Well Do the Principles Work? Distinction between opinion and attitudeOpinion = What a person believes to be factually truePrimarily cognitive and transientAttitude = An opinion that includes an evaluative and an emotional componentExtremely difficult to change
44By March 6th http://bcs.worthpublishers.com/aronson10e/default.asp You should have read chapter three by this time. Now that you have completed these power points, please go to the Social Animal website.Log in and take the quiz for chapter three, submit answers to my .