Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Patterns of HER2–PET/CT confronted with FDG–PET/CT, Maximum intensity projection. Lesion uptake was considered pertinent when visually higher.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Patterns of HER2–PET/CT confronted with FDG–PET/CT, Maximum intensity projection. Lesion uptake was considered pertinent when visually higher."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Patterns of HER2–PET/CT confronted with FDG–PET/CT, Maximum intensity projection. Lesion uptake was considered pertinent when visually higher than blood pool. (A) Entire tumor load showed pertinent tracer uptake; (B) dominant part of tumor load showed tracer uptake; (C) minor part of tumor load showed tracer uptake; (D) entire tumor load lacked tracer uptake. From: Molecular imaging as a tool to investigate heterogeneity of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and to predict patient outcome under trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): the ZEPHIR trial Ann Oncol. 2015;27(4): doi: /annonc/mdv577 Ann Oncol | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please 1


Download ppt "Figure 1. Patterns of HER2–PET/CT confronted with FDG–PET/CT, Maximum intensity projection. Lesion uptake was considered pertinent when visually higher."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google