Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
**Robust Bayesian Portfolio Construction**

Josh Davis, PIMCO Jan 12, 2009 UC Santa Barbara Seminar on Statistics and Applied Probability

2
**Introduction Modern portfolio theory 2 Main Ingredients**

Markowitz’s seminal work (1952, JoF) Sharpe’s CAPM (1964, JoF) Ross’s APT (1976,JET) Pimco’s approach to asset allocation 2 Main Ingredients Utility Function of Investor Distribution of Asset Returns

3
**Markowitz Mean-Variance Efficiency**

Original representation of portfolio problem Investor maximizes following utility function: Subject to: Where: Investor indifferent to higher order moments! Gaussian distribution carries all information relevant to investor’s problem!

4
**Markowitz Solution Theoretical Result: Diversification!**

“Don’t put all your eggs in one basket” Practical Issues to Model Implementation “Good” estimates of first two moments These moments are state dependent These moments are also ‘endogenous’ General Equilibrium vs. Partial Equilibrium Solution: Assume Investor is infinitesimal

5
**Bayesian Portfolio Construction**

Black-Litterman popularized the approach Combine subjective investor ‘views’ with the sampling distribution in a consistent manner Origins in the economics literature: ‘Minnesotta Prior’ See Doan, Litterman, Sims (1984) or Litterman (1986) See Jay Walters’ excellent outline for more details Exploit conjugate priors and Bayes Rule:

6
Caveats Bayesian approach naturally integrates observed data and opinion Does the Gaussian updating distribution represent the investor’s beliefs accurately? Black/Litterman implementation very mechanical and unintuitive Inconsistent with bounded rationality, rational inattention Is the sampling distribution (prior) accurately represented by a Gaussian? Quality of asymptotic approximation? Regime switch? Posterior moments a function of this Gaussian framework Efficient Frontier particularly sensitive to the expected return inputs (Merton, 1992) What about the utility function? A wealth of economic literature suggests it doesn’t describe investor behavior accurately

7
Uncertainty As we know, There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know There are known unknowns. That is to say We know there are some things We do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don't know We don't know. —Donald Rumsfeld, Feb. 12, 2002, Department of Defense news briefing

8
**Robustness Two types of uncertainties**

Statistical uncertainty (Calculable Risk) Model uncertainty (‘Knightian’ uncertainty) Ellsberg Paradox provides empirical evidence Multi-prior representation (Gilboa and Schmeidler) Also related to literature on error detection probabilities Is the investor 100% certain in the model inputs? No! Shouldn’t portfolio construction be robust to model misspecification? Yes!

9
**Incorporating Uncertainty**

Today I will follow the statistical approach of Garlappi, Uppal and Wang (RFS, 2007) For a complete and rigorous treatment see Hansen and Sargent’s book Robustness Critical modification: max-min objective Subject to:

10
**The Space of Plausible Alternatives**

11
**Characterizing Uncertainty**

GUW take a ‘statistical approach’ based on confidence intervals I modify this for the BL framework Parameter ‘e’ determined by investor’s ‘confidence’ in the expected return

12
**Determination of Uncertainty Parameter ‘e’**

13
Solution The inner minimization can be removed via the following adjustment: Where the adjustment puts the expected return on the boundary of the plausible region

14
**Example Posterior Moments**

Commodities: % (12%) US Bonds: % (14%) US Large Cap: % (22%) US Small Cap: % (25%) Sovereign Bonds: % (18%) EM Equity: % (28%) Real Estate: % (16%)

15
**Correlations from… (Monthly Jan ’96-Dec ’08)**

Commodities: GSCI US Bonds: LBAG US Large Cap: Russell 200 US Small Cap: Russell 2000 Global Bonds: Citi Sovereign Index EM Equity: MSCI Em Index Real Estate: MSCI US Reit Index Also, added constraint of weights b/w 0 and 1

16
Definitions Reference Model: Plausible Worst Case Model Where:

17
**‘Optimal’ Weights Confidence in Model 1% 25% 50% 75% 95% 100%**

Commodities 2 US Bonds 41 14 US Large Cap 10 20 25 27 26 24 US Small Cap 6 32 35 Sovereign Bonds 13 12 7 EM Equities 3 33 39 Real Estate 8 1 Portfolio Expected Return 6.33 7.79 8.41 8.86 9.12 9.17 Portfolio Expected Volatility 7.88 9.45 11.69 13.66 15.07 15.39

18
Optimal Weights

19
**Endogenous Worst Case Returns**

20
**Robust Portfolios under Reference Model**

21
**Endogenous Worst Case Comparison**

22
**Historical Performance**

24
**Conclusion Bayesian Portfolio Methods theoretically appealing…**

Attempts to correct for misspecification by incorporating additional information Doesn’t rule out misspecification Robust methods insure against plausible worst-case scenarios Accounting for uncertainty leads to… Lower volatility under ‘reference model’ Lower expected return under ‘reference model’ Improved risk/return tradeoff under ‘worst-case’ scenarios

25
Appendices

26
**Example Derivation of Prior**

In BL views take the following form: Which can be represented as: The investor’s updating distribution is

27
Posterior Derivation The prior and updating distributions take the form The posterior is Gaussian

Similar presentations

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on types of software system Ppt on series and parallel circuits lessons Ppt on fibonacci numbers formula Ppt on the road not taken interpretation Mis ppt on nokia phones Ppt on charge-coupled device pdf Ppt on thermal conductivity of insulating powder coating Ppt on power system topics Ppt on panel discussion definition Ppt on interesting facts about dreams