Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKiara Talmage Modified over 2 years ago

1
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 1 LECTURE Market Risk/Value at Risk: Basic Concepts Version 1/9/2001

2
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 2 Value at Risk (VaR) Forecasting and Backtesting Validation of Risk Measures Basle Capital Adequacy for Market Risk and Other Approaches/ Uses of VaR TOPICS

3
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 3 Value at Risk (VaR)

4
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 4 VALUE AT RISK:RiskMetrics™, J.P. MORGAN Common methodology Handles market risk of (linear instruments): stocks, bonds, foreign assets -using the ‘parametric’ or “variance-covariance” approach (also ‘delta-normal’ approach!) Options (non-linear) - using MCS

5
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 5 VaR: CONCEPT If at 4.15pm the reported daily VaR is $10m then: Maximum amount I expect to lose in 19 out of next 20 days, is $10m OR I expect to lose more than $10m only 1 day in every 20 days (ie. 5% of the time) The VaR of $10m assumes my portfolio of assets fixed Exactly how much will I lose on any one day? Unknown !!!

6
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 6 VALUE AT RISK TOPICS VaR for stocks of –single asset –portfolio of (domestic) assets

7
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche Fig. 22.1 : Standard Normal Distribution, N(0,1) Probability -1.65 0.0 +1.65 5% of the area Return Mean = 0, = 1 Single Asset

8
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 8 VaR: Single Asset Normal Distribution (5% lower tail) implies: Only 5% of the time will the actual % return be below: “ - 1.65 1 ” = Mean Return When then:5% lower tail, cut off point = -1.65 1 Only 5% of the time will the % loss be more than “ 1.65 1 This is a PARAMETRIC approach since it requires estimation of volatility

9
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 9 VaR: Single Asset Example: Mean return = 0 % Let return) = 0.02 (per.day) (equivalent to 2%) Only 5% of the time will the loss be more than 3.3% (=1.65 x 2%) VaR of a single asset (Initial Position V 0 =$200m in equities) VaR = V 0 (1.65 ) = 200 ( 0.033) = $6.6m That is “(dollar) VaR is 3.3% of $200m” VaR is reported as a positive number (even though it’s a loss)

10
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 10 VaR of a Single Asset Are Daily Returns Normally Distributed?-not quite but close fat tails (excess kurtosis) peak is higher and narrower negative skewness small (positive) autocorrelations squared returns have strong autocorrelation, ARCH But niid is a (good ) approx for equities, long term bonds, spot FX, and futures (but not for short term interest rates or options)

11
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 11 VaR : Portfolio of Assets : Diversification 1) Text Book Approach p = VaR p = V p (1.65 p ) V p = total $’s held in whole portfolio Can we express the above formula in terms of VaR of each individual asset? (VaR 1, VaR 2 etc) Yes!

12
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 12 VaR : Portfolio of Assets “Street/City” uses $ or £’s held in each asset, V i Note that w i = V i / V p (substitute in above equation) then VaR p = where VaR i = V i (1.65 i ) - for single asset-i

13
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 13 VaR : Portfolio of Assets Can we put VaR in matrix form? - Yes Given VaR p = where VaR i = V i (1.65 i ) - for single asset-i Let Z = [ VaR 1, VaR 2 ] (2 x 1 vector) C = [ 1 ; 1 ] = correlation matrix (2x2) THEN: VaR p = [Z C Z’] 1/2

14
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 14 An arithmetical nuance If asset-1 is held long and asset-2 has been ‘short sold’ then for example V 1 = +$100 and V 2 = -$50 So when constructing the “Z” vector then: VaR 1 = ($100)1.65 1 and VaR 2 = (-$50)1.65 2 we still have Z = [ VaR 1, VaR 2 ] and VaR p = [Z C Z’] 1/2 Above is known as the “Variance-Covariance” approach VaR : Portfolio of Assets

15
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 15 “Worst Case VaR” Assume all correlations are +1 and all assets are held “long” then VaR p = which with all =+1 gives VaR p = { VaR 1 + VaR 2 } -i.e. no “diversification effect”

16
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 16 Forecasting and Backtesting

17
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 17 Forecasting Volatility Simple Moving Average ( Assume Mean Return = 0) t+1|t = (1/n) R 2 t-i Exponentially Weighted Moving Average EWMA t+1|t = R 2 t-i w i = (1- ) It can be shown that this may be re-written: t+1|t = t| t-1 + (1- R t 2 Longer Horizons :” -rule” - for returns iid.

18
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 18 EWMA (Recursive) t+1|t = t| t-1 + (1- R t 2 is found to Min. forecast error (R t+1 2 - t+1|t ) Cut off point : Start recursion in the computer using about 74 days of historical data, so that 0 = (1/n) R 2 t-i Covariance xy,t+1|t = xy,t|t-1 +(1- ) R x,t R y,t Correlation = xy / x y Non-synchronous trading ? Forecasting Volatility

19
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 19 Validation of Risk Measures “Backtesting”

20
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 20 Validation of Risk Measures 1.Individual Returns Series How many? Are about 5% of actual (individual) returns R t+1 ‘greater than’ the forecast of 1.65 t+1|t ? Yes ! How big? Are the actual returns in lower 5 th percentile the same size as those for the normal distribution? “Yes” for equity, bond and spot FX - returns

21
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 21 2. Portfolio of Assets Portfolio Returns Take equal wtd portfolio of 200 assets. Forecast all the individual VaR i ’s = V i 1.65 t+1|t, calculate portfolio VaR for each day: VaR p = [Z C Z’] 1/2 then see if actual portfolio losses exceed this only 5% of the time (over some historic period, eg. 252 days). Validation of Risk Measures

22
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche Figure 22.2: Backtesting Days Daily $m profit/loss 0 2.5 5.0 -2.5 -5.0 = forecast = actual

23
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 23 Basle Capital Adequacy for Market Risk and Other approaches/ uses of VaR

24
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 24 Capital Adequacy : Basle Basle Internal Models Approach (VaR) Calc VaR for worst 1% of losses over 10 days Use at least 1-year of daily data to forecast t+1|t VaR i = 2.33 left tail critical value ) Capital Charge KC KC = Max ( Av.of prev 60-days VaR x M, or, previous day’s VaR) + SR M = multiplier (min = 3) SR = specific risk (equity and fixed income)

25
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 25 Pre-commitment Approach Capital charge = announced VaR If losses exceed VaR, then impose a penalty Penalties Go public Financial penalty Greater regulatory surveillance Transparent and simple Reduces compliance costs Minimises portfolio distortions But does not avert ‘go for broke strategy’

26
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 26 Assessing Performance of Investment Managers Whose got the biggest Sharpe Ratio ? S = (R av - r ) / R av = actual monthly returns averaged over 1 year (say) = s.d. of portfolio of assets (calculated as in VaR framework (but with returns measured over a 1-day horizon and grossed up with the “root T “ rule to 1- month).

27
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 27 LECTURE ENDS

28
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 28 TAKE A BREAK

Similar presentations

OK

Copyright K.Cuthbertson, D. Nitzsche 1 FINANCIAL ENGINEERING: DERIVATIVES AND RISK MANAGEMENT (J. Wiley, 2001) K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche Lecture VaR:

Copyright K.Cuthbertson, D. Nitzsche 1 FINANCIAL ENGINEERING: DERIVATIVES AND RISK MANAGEMENT (J. Wiley, 2001) K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche Lecture VaR:

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google

Ppt on obstructive jaundice Ppt on dry cell and wet cell Ppt on eia report oil Ppt on water scarcity in india Ppt on glorious past of india Ppt on fibonacci numbers Ppt on earth dams Ppt on online banking system project Ppt on solar energy advantages and disadvantages Ppt on conservation of natural resources for class 10