Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of mitral valve operated patients<sup>a</sup>aAF, atrial fibrillation; LA, left atrium; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic.

Published byGerald Henderson Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Table 1 Baseline characteristics of mitral valve operated patients<sup>a</sup>aAF, atrial fibrillation; LA, left atrium; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic."— Presentation transcript:

1 Table 1 Baseline characteristics of mitral valve operated patients<sup>a</sup>aAF, atrial fibrillation; LA, left atrium; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; NYHA, New York Heart Association classification; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; NS, not significant. From: Mitral valve surgery and atrial fibrillation: is atrial fibrillation surgery also needed? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(5): doi: /S (00) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.Elsevier Science B.V.

2 Table 2 Surgical procedures and in-hospital arrhythmia treatment<sup>a</sup>aNumbers represent number of patients. AF, atrial fibrillation; DC, direct current cardioversion; MVP, mitral valve plasty; MVR, mitral valve replacement; Rx, cardioversion with drugs; TVP, tricuspid valve plasty; NS, not significant. From: Mitral valve surgery and atrial fibrillation: is atrial fibrillation surgery also needed? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(5): doi: /S (00) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.Elsevier Science B.V.

3 Table 3 Rhythm at discharge<sup>a</sup>aNumbers represent number of patients. AF, atrial fibrillation; AFl, atrial flutter; NS, not significant. From: Mitral valve surgery and atrial fibrillation: is atrial fibrillation surgery also needed? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(5): doi: /S (00) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.Elsevier Science B.V.

4 Table 4 Follow-up results<sup>a</sup>aNumbers represent number of patients. AF, atrial fibrillation; AFl, atrial flutter; NS, not significant. From: Mitral valve surgery and atrial fibrillation: is atrial fibrillation surgery also needed? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(5): doi: /S (00) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.Elsevier Science B.V.

5 Fig. 1 Preoperative rhythm and sinus rhythm after mitral valve surgery
Fig. 1 Preoperative rhythm and sinus rhythm after mitral valve surgery. Kaplan–Meier curves of patients with sinus rhythm after mitral valve surgery. The 4-year proportion of patients showing only sinus rhythm was 63.3, 29.7 and 2.0%, respectively, in patients with preoperative sinus rhythm (n=59), paroxysmal (n=29) or chronic atrial fibrillation (n=74). The curves show a significant difference: P≪ The figures at the bottom represent the number of patients at risk. From: Mitral valve surgery and atrial fibrillation: is atrial fibrillation surgery also needed? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(5): doi: /S (00) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.Elsevier Science B.V.

6 Fig. 2 (a) Postoperative sinus rhythm and additional tricuspid repair
Fig. 2 (a) Postoperative sinus rhythm and additional tricuspid repair. Kaplan–Meier curves of patients with mitral valve surgery and additional tricuspid repair, with postoperative sinus rhythm. The 4-year atrial fibrillation-free percentage was 37.3% in patients without tricuspid repair and 0% in patients with tricuspid repair. The curves show a clear difference: P≪ The figures at the bottom represent the number of patients at risk. (b) Postoperative sinus rhythm in patients discharged with sinus rhythm and additional tricuspid repair. Kaplan–Meier curves of patients with mitral valve surgery and additional tricuspid repair, discharged with sinus rhythm. The 4-year atrial fibrillation-free percentage was 66% in patients without tricuspid repair and 0% in patients with tricuspid repair. The curves show a clear difference: P≪ The figures at the bottom represent the number of patients at risk. From: Mitral valve surgery and atrial fibrillation: is atrial fibrillation surgery also needed? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(5): doi: /S (00) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.Elsevier Science B.V.

7 Fig. 3 (a) Preoperative rhythm and survival after mitral valve surgery
Fig. 3 (a) Preoperative rhythm and survival after mitral valve surgery. Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients after mitral valve surgery, with preparative sinus rhythm, paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation. The 4-year survival was 95.2, 89.2 and 82.9%, respectively. The curves did not show difference: P=0.13. The figures at the bottom represent the number of patients at risk. (b) Postoperative sinus rhythm and survival after mitral valve surgery. Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients after mitral valve surgery, with postoperative sinus rhythm or paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation. The 4-year survival was 94.8 and 88%, respectively. The curves tend to show difference: P=0.05. The figures at the bottom represent the number of patients at risk. From: Mitral valve surgery and atrial fibrillation: is atrial fibrillation surgery also needed? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17(5): doi: /S (00) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg | © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.Elsevier Science B.V.

Download ppt "Table 1 Baseline characteristics of mitral valve operated patients<sup>a</sup>aAF, atrial fibrillation; LA, left atrium; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic."

Similar presentations

THE RHYTHM IN LIFE THE SEASONS DO NOT PUSH ONE ANOTHER; NEITHER DO CLOUDS RACE THE WIND ACROSS THE SKY. ALL THINGS HAPPEN IN THEIR OWN GOOD TIME.

THE RHYTHM IN LIFE THE SEASONS DO NOT PUSH ONE ANOTHER; NEITHER DO CLOUDS RACE THE WIND ACROSS THE SKY. ALL THINGS HAPPEN IN THEIR OWN GOOD TIME.
Echocardiographic predictors of perioperative atrial fibrillation EUROECHO 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark Katova T, Simova I, Nesheva A, Hristova K, Kostova.

Echocardiographic predictors of perioperative atrial fibrillation EUROECHO 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark Katova T, Simova I, Nesheva A, Hristova K, Kostova.
Primary Mitral Regurgitation Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease

Primary Mitral Regurgitation Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease
Management of mitral regurgitation. See legend for Fig

Management of mitral regurgitation. See legend for Fig
Moderate Tricuspid Regurgitation With Left-Sided Degenerative Heart Valve Disease: To Repair or Not to Repair?  Jose L. Navia, MD, Nicolas A. Brozzi,

Moderate Tricuspid Regurgitation With Left-Sided Degenerative Heart Valve Disease: To Repair or Not to Repair?  Jose L. Navia, MD, Nicolas A. Brozzi,
Table 1 Cause of death for arrested organ donors

Table 1 Cause of death for arrested organ donors
Fig. 3 Overall and disease-free survival of single-zone metastasis group according to the number of stations involved. No significant differences were.

Fig. 3 Overall and disease-free survival of single-zone metastasis group according to the number of stations involved. No significant differences were.
The case of 17-year-old male with LEOPARD syndrome

The case of 17-year-old male with LEOPARD syndrome
Table 1 Staging of resected tumours of the oesophagus

Table 1 Staging of resected tumours of the oesophagus
Successful Cox Maze Procedure During Mitral Valve Surgery Restores Patient Survival Without Increasing Operative Risk Niv Ad, MD Chief, Cardiac Surgery.

Successful Cox Maze Procedure During Mitral Valve Surgery Restores Patient Survival Without Increasing Operative Risk Niv Ad, MD Chief, Cardiac Surgery.
Figure 1: Correlation of plasma ET-1 levels with LAD in patients with mitral valve disease. r is Pearson’s correlation coefficient. ET-1: endothelin 1;

Figure 1: Correlation of plasma ET-1 levels with LAD in patients with mitral valve disease. r is Pearson’s correlation coefficient. ET-1: endothelin 1;
Video-assisted minimally invasive surgery for lone atrial fibrillation: A clinical report of 81 cases  Yong-qiang Cui, MD, PhD, Yan Li, MD, Feng Gao,

Video-assisted minimally invasive surgery for lone atrial fibrillation: A clinical report of 81 cases  Yong-qiang Cui, MD, PhD, Yan Li, MD, Feng Gao,
Table 1 Comparison of perioperative patient characteristics by groups

Table 1 Comparison of perioperative patient characteristics by groups
Runar Lundblad, MD, Michel Abdelnoor, PhD, Jan L Svennevig, MD 

Runar Lundblad, MD, Michel Abdelnoor, PhD, Jan L Svennevig, MD 
Fig. 1 Log-rank test comparing survival in patients undergoing surgical repair with those treated with TEVAR. Black line: TEVAR; grey line: surgical repair.

Fig. 1 Log-rank test comparing survival in patients undergoing surgical repair with those treated with TEVAR. Black line: TEVAR; grey line: surgical repair.
Table 1 Hospital mortality

Table 1 Hospital mortality
Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics

Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics
Table 1 Recipient’s characteristics.

Table 1 Recipient’s characteristics.
Fig. 3 Summary estimates of the relative risks for the different surgical techniques for late mortality. Comparing the two main techniques, EVR showed.

Fig. 3 Summary estimates of the relative risks for the different surgical techniques for late mortality. Comparing the two main techniques, EVR showed.
(A) Atrial (RA) and ventricular (RV) electrograms from unipolar DDD pacemaker during atrial fibrillation (AF). AF appears as rapid atrial depolarizations.

(A) Atrial (RA) and ventricular (RV) electrograms from unipolar DDD pacemaker during atrial fibrillation (AF). AF appears as rapid atrial depolarizations.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google