1. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Schematic of experimental setup of SFITC

2. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Sorption isotherms of several shale formations

3. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
CEC-normalized sorption isotherm for different shale formations

4. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Pore pressure response of Mancos Shale (MSP#1) using distilled water

5. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Pore pressure response of Mancos Shale (MSP#14) tested with mud filtrate

6. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Pore pressure response of Mancos Shale (MSP#24) tested with a solution of 1% w/w KCl

7. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Pore pressure response of Mancos Shale (MSP#35) tested with a solution of 1% w/w CaCl2

8. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Pore pressure response of Mancos Shale (MSP#37) tested with a solution of 2% w/w KCl

9. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of experimental and modeling results of Catoosa Shale sample tested with 1% w/w KCl

10. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of experimental and modeling results of GOM Shale sample tested with 10% w/w KCl

11. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of experimental and modeling results of Eagle Ford Shale sample tested with 3% w/w KCl

12. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparing the hydraulic diffusivity and monolayer moisture content of the selected shale types

13. Date of download: 10/20/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Investigating the Relation Between Sorption Tendency and Hydraulic Properties of Shale Formations
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;140(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Workflow for wellbore stability analysis for shale formations