1. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 CO2 emission trend from power plants in Oklahoma Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 Locations of brine /disposal wells and power plants in Oklahoma (created by ARCVIEW GIS version 8.2) Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 Ion concentration distributions before CO2 injection Figure Legend:

4. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 Average ion concentrations after CO2 reaction (closed system) Figure Legend:

5. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 Grid block system (60×1×30) in aquifer and simulation cases Figure Legend:

6. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 Relative permeability (based on Stone’s second model ) Figure Legend:

7. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 Pressure variations at the injection site (layer 15): all cases Figure Legend:

8. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 CO2 molality for different cases Figure Legend:

9. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 The water mass density in the upper and lower layers Figure Legend:

10. Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Feasibility Investigation and Modeling Analysis of CO2 Sequestration in Arbuckle Formation Utilizing Salt Water Disposal Wells J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2009;131(2):023301-023301-10. doi:10.1115/1.3124115 Mineral variations for different cases Figure Legend: