1. External Examiner briefing 30 January 2015

2. Programme 11:00 Presentation and Q&A on the University context 12:00 Informal lunch and Faculty briefing/discussion on subject specific arrangements

3. Presentation outline York St John University: the wider context The role of external examiners Academic structures, regulations and procedures relating to assessment Assessment projects Where to find further information

4. The wider context Taught Degree Awarding Powers (TDAP) September 2005 University title October 2006 Previously, most programmes validated by University of Leeds - last significant cohorts finished 2010 Research degrees currently awarded by University of Leeds - RDAP scrutiny process completed 2014 and recommendations to ACDAP

5. The wider context Some programmes in partnership with external providers, including a small number overseas (Malaysia, Vietnam, Singapore) First Institutional Audit April 2011 (report September 2011) Positive outcome from follow-up to Audit December 2012

6. Commitment to quality Students at the heart of what we do, reflected in NSS and other survey scores Positive outcomes in Ofsted for ITT Positive outcome in QAA Audit follow-up, December 2012 Strong engagement with external reference points on quality and standards Commitment to enhancement Importance of external examiners: formal and informal feedback very welcome at any point

7. UK Quality Code Chapter B7 Common UK understanding of the role Criteria for appointment External examiner details provided to students Common reporting requirements and confirmation of evidence available to support role

8. Role of External Examiners Appointments Appointments are made by York St John University Appointments are approved by a scrutiny panel of Quality and Standards Committee For YSJU collaborative provision, partner institutions recommend external examiners but examiners are appointed by, and report to, York St John University

9. Responsibilities Verification that standards are appropriate, with reference to national benchmarks Ensuring that assessment procedures are rigorous and fair in measuring achievement against learning outcomes and are conducted in line with regulations and policies Comparability of standards and the achievements of students Assist in the identification of good practice and enhancement opportunities Role of External Examiners

10. Involvement in assessment processes Comment on form, content and mark scheme of assessments Moderation through sampling of assessment outcomes (scripts; examination papers; project reports) Review of fail marks Participation in Subject-area Assessment Panels (SAPs) Consideration of relevant data (fairness and internal comparability) Role of External Examiners

11. Reporting Report form meets UK Quality Code expectations Standard template across taught programmes with areas for comment and confirmation of evidence available Reports by 1 August or 1 November Informs the Annual Evaluative process You should expect a written response Full reports shared with students, along with external examiner details Welcome to make confidential report to Vice Chancellor if necessary Role of External Examiners

12. Other interactions We ask Faculties to keep you fully informed of proposed curriculum developments and internal review Please ask if you would like to visit students on placements/meet or interview students Importance of externality regarding changes to programmes – may be asked to provide comments Role of External Examiners

13. Academic Structures Responsibilities for quality and standards shared between central University and Faculties/Business School Structures in place since 2011 have further clarified responsibilities

14. Academic Board Chair - Vice Chancellor Board of Examiners for Progress and Awards Chair - Deputy Vice Chancellor Subject-area Assessment Panels Quality and Standards Committee Chair - Deputy Vice Chancellor Scrutiny Panels Faculty Quality and Standards Committees Enhancement and Student Experience Committee Chair - Pro Vice Chancellor Faculty Enhancement and Student Experience Committees Research Committee Chair - Deputy Vice Chancellor Faculty Research Committees Research Degrees Sub- Committee Main committees relating to quality and standards

15. Faculty/ Business School Structure Faculties/Business School embrace one or more departments (subject areas) Within Faculties/Business School, Heads of Department provide oversight of academic provision Locus of responsibility for assessment within Faculties/Business School is the Subject area Assessment Panel Heads of Department usually chair the SAP Heads of Programme

16. Joint Honours Fully integrated within Faculties Subject specialisms for Joint Honours are looked after within their respective Faculty/Business School and fall within the remit of the relevant subject external examiner A pre-meeting in advance of the Board of Examiners provides an additional opportunity to identify any anomalies

17. Assessment Two-tier arrangement – University Degree classification and application of award rules is a matter for the University Board of Examiners for Progress and Award External Examiner for Progress and Award presides over classification and award process at the Board

18. Assessment Two-tier arrangement – Faculty/Business School The SAP is responsible for module marks and also scrutinising profiles to make recommendations to the Board of Examiners Subject External Examiners are members of SAPs and are expected to attend once per year (can operate remotely at other times). They can attend the Board of Examiners for Progress and Award if they wish

19. Assessment In partner institutions Nature of partnership: validation, franchise or off site delivery? Validation - partner-organised assessment panel with external examiner and ULR present Franchise - faculty decision whether one joint panel for the University and the partner organisation. This affects how external examiner is involved Offsite delivery - YSJU organises the SAP and partner organisations send representatives

20. Assessment In partner institutions All results submitted to YSJU Board of Examiners in relation to progress and award decisions Care taken to ensure comparability of standards

21. Undergraduate Classification (1) Common method across the University Based on penultimate and final year 2 calculations to the benefit of the student (a) 1:1 Upper Level Average Calculation The PLA and FLA are weighted equally (b) 1:2 Upper Level Average Calculation The FLA is weighted at double the PLA

22. Undergraduate Classification (2)

23. Assessment Postgraduate awards Taught postgraduate awards Distinction69.5100 Borderline band69.069.49 Merit59.568.99 Borderline band59.059.49 Pass49.558.99 Borderline cases reviewed by the Board of Examiners

24. Assessment Involvement at Level 1 Importance of involvement of external examiners for all provision leading to a higher education award For a standard 3-year UG degree, external examiners not involved in routine sampling of level 1 assessment An external examiner should nevertheless take a watching brief of the whole of a programme including level 1 Particular role in relation to new programmes

25. Assessment Involvement at Level 1 An external examiner for a foundation degree will take responsibility for level 1 as well as level 2 Free-standing level 1 awards will have their own external examiner Importance of involvement in exit awards

26. Assessment Marking scale 0-100 judgemental scale (pass mark of 40 for UG modules and 50 for PG modules) Encourage full use of the scale and rely on external examiners to guide us particularly at the higher (and lower) ends Subject areas produce criteria for the marking in each band

27. Assessment Marking scale SAPs need to make a decision as to whether a student gets a mark less than 20 - consequences for progression In YSJ system, a mark will have to be greater than 20 in order to be condoned for progression SAPs also concentrate on whether marks at class borderlines are correct

28. York St John University | www.yorksj.ac.uk Unconfirmed component marks input to SITS by 12 June 2015 Module marks calculated Marks remain provisional pending ex ex review at SAP All SAPs held by 19 June 2015–ExEx in attendance Mark lists and classification lists produced by Faculties for SAPs Board of Examiners 2 July 2015 Internal Marking completed and remote Consultation ExEx Finalised marks committed to SITS end June 2014 and cases to Concessions Committee Faculty pre-boards to consider profiles and make recommendations Concessions Committee Joint Hons pre- Board 2 July 2015 Class recommendations and any other special cases prepared

29. Assessment Projects Driver for change in assessment policy and practice Academic Board ‘in principle’ approval for move to a 15-point mark scale from 2015/16 and development of University grade descriptors Development of ‘Principles of Feedback’ BME progression and attainment Significant improvements in student satisfaction with assessment and feedback Views and experiences from elsewhere in the sector always welcome

31. Other matters Mitigating circumstances handled through University Concessions Committee for consistency University policy on e-marking and e-feedback. Moodle widely used in conjunction with external examining

32. Moodle

33. Quality Gateway