1. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Candidate sets of the proposed modified three-block median predictor for (a) the x component and (b) the y component. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

2. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. A search path of VSA to find the final motion vector. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

3. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. The MV of the current block might relate to the motion vectors of the blocks around the collocated block in the previous frame. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

4. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. The number of the predictors in different d for (a) SIF-Tennis, (b) CIF-Mthr ̱ _dotr, and (c) QCIF-Suzie. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

5. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. The adjacent blocks used for detection of a similar moving object. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

6. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Search paths of PCHS. (a) Example of (0,−2) predictor point and search by cross patterns. (b) Example of (7,5) predictor point and search by hexagon pattern. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

7. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. An example for high PMA searching by LC-HSP. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

8. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Flowchart of the PCHS algorithm. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

9. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Performance comparison between different BMAs on QCIF sequence Suzie by (a) the MAE per pixel and (b) the average number of search points. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

10. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Performance comparison between different BMAs on QCIF sequence Foreman by (a) the MAE per pixel and (b) the average computation. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

11. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Performance comparison between different BMAs on CIF sequence Football by (a) the MAE per pixel and (b) the average computation. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888

12. Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Performance comparison between different BMAs on SIF sequence Stefan by (a) the MAE per pixel and (b) the average computation. Figure Legend: From: Predictive cross-hexagon search algorithm for fast block motion estimation J. Electron. Imaging. 2009;18(1):013005-013005-11. doi:10.1117/1.3073888