1. Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence (VPP CX) Capability for the Department of Defense Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence National Safety Perception Council (NSC) Survey Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence (VPP CX) Capability for the Department of Defense

2. Objectives After this training you will be able to: –Define why to survey employees –Discuss benchmarking –Describe results interpretation.

3. Why Survey Employees? Better indicator of program quality Sort strengths / weaknesses Automatically generate prioritized action plan Facilitate employee involvement Non-complex, relatively non-intrusive, inexpensive Employee recognition of NSC name Benchmark among locations and against NSC Database.

4. Benchmarking NSC database contains results from 244 (or 261 for Army Safety) clients. Percentiles, scaled from 0 to 100, compare your employees’ responses with those of other survey users on 50 standardized safety program components.

5. Percentile Benchmarks Percentile benchmarks help to: –Clarify the status of your current program –Set improvement priorities –Establish a baseline for assessing future progress.

6. Surveys Use surveys as: –Evaluation tools –Planning tools –Motivation tools.

7. NSC Database Profile 27% General manufacturing 15% Mining 14% Food manufacturing 10% Chemical manufacturing 8% Electronics manufacturing 8% Federal / State / Local government 6% Public utilities.

8. Validity Studies

9. Challenges: Results Interpretation DON’T focus on negative results DON’T finger-point DON’T knee-jerk / overreact DON’T discount or ignore results.

10. Challenges: Results Interpretation DO keep employees informed DO include employees in results interpretation and program changes.

11. Path Forward Following actions recommended: –Team(s) of personnel should be identified to further understand survey results & implement changes –Results interpretation team(s) should include personnel from all appropriate levels of the organization –Proposed action strategies should be reviewed and endorsed by top management –Results of action plans should be measured –Feedback of survey results should be communicated to survey population & wider audience.

12. Challenges: Taking Action Re-survey to measure progress and effectiveness of actions Survey value increases with each re-survey: –Survey improvement scores maybe more important than current results.

13. Safety Barometer 50-items Strongly agree to strongly disagree 6 safety program categories Benchmarked against a database of past NSC clients.

14. Safety Program Categories Management Participation (7 items) Supervisor Participation (9 items) Employee Participation (9 items) Safety Support Activities (10 items) Safety Support Climate (10 items) Organizational Climate (5 items).

15. Percentile Scores of Safety Program Components

16. Percentile Scores by Program Category

17. Average Response Scores by Length of Time at Installations

18. Program Category Scores by Organizational Position

19. Summary In this section you learned about: –Why to survey employees –Benchmarking –Results interpretation.