1. Collection Management and Resource Discovery in OULS Alice Keller OULS Asst Director, C&RD ALLCU Conference, Oxford, July 08

2. Libraries in Oxford 39 College Libraries „Bodleian Group“ BodleianInd Inst Oriental Collections RHO/VHL LawRSL Departmental and Faculty Libraries Other Libraries Taylor LibrarySackler Library

3. Libraries in Oxford 39 College Libraries Bodleian Group BodleianInd Inst Oriental Collections RHO/VHL LawRSL Departmental and Faculty Libraries Other Libraries Taylor LibrarySackler Library OULS

4. Subject consultant -Selection -Budget holder -User education Materials budget Clerical Staff involved in -Acquisitions -Cataloguing -Book processing Part I: Organisation of selection, ordering, and cataloguing in OULS

5. OULS

6. OLIS OULS

7. OLIS OULS c. 2003 c. 2005 c. 2008?

8. OLIS OULS Next steps?

9. Alternative proposals for next steps

10. OLIS OULS Here we are in 2007 Alternative proposals for next steps

11. OLIS OULS

12. Eastern Europea n Lang Hub Western Europea n Lang Hub English Lang Hub (incl. LD) - OSNEY - Shelf - ready Lib C Shelf - ready Lib G Shelf - ready Lib F Shelf - ready Lib E Shelf - ready Lib D Shelf - ready Lib A Shelf - ready Lib B E- resou rces Non- Euro p Lang Non- Euro p Lang Chin/Jap WC Selection German Polish French English Italian Vendor systems Depository Suggested organisation for ordering, receiving, cataloguing books in OULS

13. 1.Hidden collections 2.Bodleian shortcomings. Is there such a thing? 3.The beauty of complexity 4.Challenges for OLIS 5.E-journal usage 6.Google Books: How much quality do users expect? Part II: Particular challenges in Oxford relating to Collections and Resource Discovery

14. Backlogs of uncatalogued material Hidden collections

15. Collections on card catalogues Hidden collections

16. Digitised images: will users find this? Hidden collections

18. Digitised, but not seamlessly integrated in OLIS Hidden collections

19. Bodleian shortcomings Is there such a thing? Bodleian shortcomings

23. “… the Faculty Libraries were created to compensate for Bodleian shortcomings.” more user-oriented approach, open shelf collections, support for Reading Lists, lending libraries, emphasis on speed. Bodleian shortcomings

26. The Beauty of Complexity: Workflows in OULS Beauty of Complexity

29. Challenges for OLIS

33. E-Journal use vs lending stats Some stats for 2006/07: Full-text downloads: 4,412,546 Loans from Oxford university and college libraries: 2,306,700 Satisfied ASR requests: 328,896 E-Journal usage

34. Google Books how much quality do users need / want / expect?