1. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 1 Chemical Informatics & Cyberinfrastructure Collaboratory HTS Data Analysis & Virtual Screening David J. Wild Visiting Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Informatics djwild@indiana.edu http://www.informatics.indiana.edu/djwild/

2. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 2 Content Web services framework for HTS data analysis –Long-term approach Priorities for web service development –Rapid dataset organization using cluster analysis –Interface tools for navigation and analysis –Virtual screening

3. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 3 Thoughts relating to Pubchem HTS analysis (and more widely applicable) Existing approaches do not scale up well Scientists’ questions are probably not going to be conceptually complex, but finding the answers can currently be very time consuming and/or complex (for a human) –“who else is working on this chemical structure I just made (or similar ones)?” –“are there any compounds in Pubchem (or elsewhere) that might bind to the active site of this protein I just resolved?” –“do any compounds related to this one exhibit toxic side effects?” We need to figure out just what the questions are! (Contextual Inquiry, Use cases) Answers are often “stale” after a short period of time – questions need to be re-answered as new information is generated Almost all available systems are passive, and follow the (web) browsing model

4. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 4 PurposeTools Interaction LayerSoftware for information access and storage by humans, including email, browsing tools and “push” tools Web browsers, email clients, RSS aggregators, JMol, JME Aggregation LayerSoftware, intelligent agents and data schemas customized for particular domains, applications and users BPEL, Microsoft Smart Client Interface LayerCommon interfaces to the data layer – may be several for different kinds of information Apache web services, SOAP wrappers, WSDL, UDDI, XML, Microsoft.NET Data LayerComprehensive data provision including storage, calculation, semantics and meta-data, probably in multiple systems MySQL, PostgreSQL, gNova Cartridge chemoinformatics calculation programs; data from NCI, ZINC Wild, D.J., Strategies for Using Information Effectively in Early-stage Drug Discovery, in Ekins, S. (ed), Computer Applications in Pharmaceutical Research and Development, submitted July 2005

5. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 5 PurposeTools Interaction LayerSoftware for information access and storage by humans, including email, browsing tools and “push” tools Web browsers, email clients, RSS aggregators, JMol, JME Aggregation LayerSoftware, intelligent agents and data schemas customized for particular domains, applications and users BEPL, Microsoft Smart Client Interface LayerCommon interfaces to the data layer – may be several for different kinds of information Apache web services, SOAP wrappers, WSDL, UDDI, XML, Microsoft.NET Data LayerComprehensive data provision including storage, calculation, semantics and meta-data, probably in multiple systems MySQL, PostgreSQL, gNova Cartridge chemoinformatics calculation programs; data from NCI, ZINC Wild, D.J., Strategies for Using Information Effectively in Early-stage Drug Discovery, in Ekins, S. (ed), Computer Applications in Pharmaceutical Research and Development, submitted July 2005 web services databases & tools intelligent agents human interfaces

6. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 6 Online database (e.g. PubChem) Local database 3D Docking Tool 2D-3D converter 3D visualizer UDDI New Structure Service Search online databases for recent structures Search local databases for recent structures Merge Results AGENT / SMART CLIENT Parse request Select appropriate use cases and/or web service(s) Schedule as necessary Request from Human Interface WSDL SOAP atomic services aggregate services USE-CASE SCRIPT Invoke New Structure Service Convert structures to 3D Dock results & protein file Extract any hits Return links for visualization “find me all the structures that fit the enclosed protein for The next three months”

7. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 7 Priorities for web service development Rapid dataset search and organization –Search of PubChem (SOAP interface already exists) –Search of local gNova / PostgreSQL database –Clustering using BCI (Digital Chemistry) Divisive K-Means –BCI Markush searching Interface tools for navigation and analysis –Integration with Spotfire –ChemTK (or other spreadsheet-metaphor product) –Develop entirely new interface tools (usability studies) Virtual Screening –Molecular docking with OpenEye FRED –Property calculation with Molinspiration / Chemaxon –PDB Search (EMBL) –Activity prediction modules (Molinspiration / RP / SVMs etc)

8. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 8 Visualization & interface level tools No matter how clever the smarts underneath, the overriding factor in usefulness will be the quality of scientists’ interaction with the system Contextual Design, Interaction Design (Cooper) and Usability Studies have proven effective in designing the right interfaces for the right people in chemical informatics, and deserve investigation for future use in this project Possibility of multiple interfaces for different people groups (Cooper’s “primary personas”) Don’t assume the browser interface – email / NLP ? Start with the basics –2D chemical structure drawing (input) –Visualization of large numbers of chemical structures in 2D –3D chemical structure visualization Planning on evaluation of NLP, email, RSS, etc. as well as browser-based interfaces

9. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 9 Visualization methods for datasets & clusters Partitions –Spreadsheets –Enhanced Spreadsheets –2D or 3D plots Hierarchies –Dendograms –Tree Maps –Hyperbolic Maps

10. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 10 Supplemental Slides

11. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 11

12. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 12

13. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 13 Use Case #1 Are there any good ligands for my target? A chemist is working on a project involving a particular protein target, and wants to know: –Any newly published compounds which might fit the protein receptor site –Any published 3D structures of the protein or of protein-ligand complexes –Any interactions of compounds with other proteins –Any information published on the protein target

14. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 14 Use Case #1 Are there any good ligands for my target? A chemist is working on a project involving a particular protein target, and wants to know: –Any newly published compounds which might fit the protein receptor site gNova / PostgreSQL, PubChem search, FRED Docking –Any published 3D structures of the protein or of protein-ligand complexes PDB search –Any interactions of compounds with other proteins gNova / PostgreSQL, PubChem search –Any information published on the protein target Journal text search

15. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 15 Use Case #2 Who else is working on these structures? A chemist is working on a chemical series for a particular project and wants to know: –If anyone publishes anything using the same or related compounds –Any new compounds added to the corporate collection which are similar or related –If any patents are submitted that might overlap the compounds he is working on –Any pharmacological or toxicological results for those or related compounds –The results for any other projects for which those compounds were screened

16. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 16 Use Case #2 Who else is working on these structures? A chemist is working on a chemical series for a particular project and wants to know: –If anyone publishes anything using the same or related compounds ~ PubChem search –Any new compounds added to the corporate collection which are similar or related gNova CHORD / PostgreSQL –If any patents are submitted that might overlap the compounds he is working on ~ BCI Markush handling software –Any pharmacological or toxicological results for those or related compounds gNova CHORD / PostgreSQL, MiToolkit –The results for any other projects for which those compounds were screened gNova CHORD / PostgreSQL, PubChem search

17. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 17 Use Case - Pubchem Which of these hits should I follow up? An MLI HTS experiment has produced 10,000 possible hits out of a screening set of 2m compounds. A chemist at another laboratory wants to know if there are any interesting active series she might want to pursue, based on: –Structure-activity relationships –Chemical and pharmacokinetic properties –Compound history –Patentability –Toxicity –Synthetic feasibility

18. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 18 Use Case – PubChem Which of these hits should I follow up? An HTS experiment has produced 10,000 possible hits out of a screening set of 2m compounds. A chemist on the project wants to know what the most promising series of compounds for follow-up are, based on: –Series selection BCI cluster analysis –Structure-activity relationships lots of methods –Chemical and pharmacokinetic properties mitools, chemaxon –Compound history gNova / PostgreSQL / Pubchem search –Patentability BCI Markush handling software –Toxicity –Synthetic feasibility –+ requires visualization tools!

19. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 19 Cluster Analysis and Chemical Informatics Used for organizing datasets into chemical series, to build predictive models, or to select representative compounds Organizational usage has not been as well studies as the other two, but see –Wild, D.J., Blankley, C.J. Comparison of 2D Fingerprint Types and Hierarchy Level Selection Methods for Structural Grouping using Wards Clustering, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences., 2000, 40, 155-162. Essentially helping large datasets become manageable Methods used: –Jarvis-Patrick and variants O(N 2 ), single partition –Ward’s method Hierarchical, regarded as best, but at least O(N 2 ) –K-means < O(N 2 ), requires set no of clusters, a little “messy” –Sphere-exclusion (Butina) Fast, simple, similar to JP –Kohonen network Clusters arranged in 2D grid, ideal for visualization

20. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 20 Limitations of Ward’s method for large datasets (>1m) Best algorithms have O(N 2 ) time requirement (RNN) Requires random access to fingerprints –hence substantial memory requirements (O(N)) Problem of selection of best partition –can select desired number of clusters Easily hit 4GB memory addressing limit on 32 bit machines –Approximately 2m compounds

21. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 21 Scaling up clustering methods Parallelisation –Clustering algorithms can be adapted for multiple processors –Some algorithms more appropriate than others for particular architectures –Ward’s has been parallelized for shared memory machines, but overhead considerable New methods and algorithms –Divisive (“bisecting”) K-means method –Hierarchical Divisive –Approx. O(NlogN)

22. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 22 Divisive K-means Clustering New hierarchical divisive method –Hierarchy built from top down, instead of bottom up –Divide complete dataset into two clusters –Continue dividing until all items are singletons –Each binary division done using K-means method –Originally proposed for document clustering “Bisecting K-means” –Steinbach, Karypis and Kumar (Univ. Minnesota) http://www- users.cs.umn.edu/~karypis/publications/Papers/PDF/doccluster.pdf –Found to be more effective than agglomerative methods –Forms more uniformly-sized clusters at given level

23. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 23 BCI Divkmeans Several options for detailed operation –Selection of next cluster for division –size, variance, diameter –affects selection of partitions from hierarchy, not shape of hierarchy Options within each K-means division step –distance measure –choice of seeds –batch-mode or continuous update of centroids –termination criterion Have developed parallel version for Linux clusters / grids in conjunction with BCI For more information, see Barnard and Engels talks at: http://cisrg.shef.ac.uk/shef2004/conference.htm http://cisrg.shef.ac.uk/shef2004/conference.htm

24. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 24 Comparative execution times NCI subsets, 2.2 GHz Intel Celeron processor 7h 27m 3h 06m 2h 25m 44m

25. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 25 Clustering a 1 million compound dataset on a 2.2 GHz Celeron Desktop Machine MethodTime *Memory Usage K-Means (10,000 clusters) 3½ days95 MB Divisive K-means7 days65 MB Divisive K-means (Parallel, 4 machines incl. 1.7 GHz Pentium M) 16½ hours~ 50 MB * Time for a single run may vary due to different selection of seeds. Runtimes can be shortened e.g. by using a max. number of iterations or a % relocation cutoff. Results from AVIDD clusters & Teragrid coming soon….

26. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 26 Divisive Kmeans: Conclusions Much faster than Ward’s, speed comparable to K-means, suitable for very large datasets (millions) –Time requirements approximately O(N log N) –Current implementation can cluster 1m compounds in under a week on a low-power desktop PC –Cluster 1m compounds in a few hours with a 4-node parallel Linux cluster Better balance of cluster sizes than Wards or Kmeans Visual inspection of clusters suggests better assembly of compound series than other methods Better clustering of actives together than previously-studied methods Memory requirements minimal Experiments using AVIDD cluster and Teragrid forthcoming (50+ nodes)

27. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 27 Visualization & interface level tools No matter how clever the smarts underneath, the overriding factor in usefulness will be the quality of scientists’ interaction with the system Contextual Design, Interaction Design (Cooper) and Usability Studies have proven effective in designing the right interfaces for the right people in chemical informatics [collaboration with HCI?] Possibility of multiple interfaces for different people groups (Cooper’s “primary personas”) Don’t assume the browser interface – email / NLP ? Start with the basics –2D chemical structure drawing (input) –Visualization of large numbers of chemical structures in 2D –3D chemical structure visualization Planning on evaluation of NLP, email, RSS, etc. as well as browser-based interfaces

28. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 28 Usability of 2D structure drawing tools Key difference between “sequential” and “random” drawers Huge difference in intuitiveness Key factor how badly you can mess things up Marvin Sketch ≈ JME > ChemDraw >> ISIS Draw

29. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 29 Visualization methods for datasets & clusters Partitions –Spreadsheets –Enhanced Spreadsheets –2D or 3D plots Hierarchies –Dendograms –Tree Maps –Hyperbolic Maps

30. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 30

31. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 31

32. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 32 VisualiSAR – with a nod to Edward Tufte. See http://www.daylight.com/meetings/mug99/Wild/Mug99.htmlhttp://www.daylight.com/meetings/mug99/Wild/Mug99.html

33. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 33 Tree Maps – very Tufte-esque

34. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 34 External support ECCR grant ($500,000) –20% Co-PI with Fox for development of web services for HTS data organization and visualization –May lead to $5m/5 years grant for full center Applied for Microsoft Smart Clients for eScience grant ($50,000) –Including Marlon Pierce in the Community Grids lab Peter Murray-Rust group, Cambridge – offering expertise and assistance with web services IO-Informatics – provision of Sentient software and consulting BCI – clustering, structure enumeration & toolkit, consulting OpenEye – a range of calculation tools, FRED docking Molinspiration – MiTools Toolkit gNova – CHORD chemical database system Possible financial support from company in the UK

35. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 35 Technology Perl SOAP::Lite –Will be used for initial web service development –Doesn’t really implement WSDL & UDDI Apache Axis & Tomcat –Deploy WSDL for web services BPEL4WS – Business Process Execution Language –For aggregation of web services –http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws- bpel/http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws- bpel/ Microsoft.NET & C#

36. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 36 Current activities Core activities –Development of use-cases –Development of initial web services (Perl SOAP::Lite) –Use of Taverna to prototype use-case scripts Basic research on future components –Organizing large amounts of chemical information for human consumption Development of very fast parallel clustering techniques – to be exposed as web services –Selection of interface-level tools for basic interaction Chemical structure drawing, display Investigation of email, NLP, RSS, and browser interfaces –Interface-level tools for visualization, navigation and analysis Cluster and dataset visualization, natural language interfaces)

37. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 37 Sentient - an alternative approach to managing heterogenous data sources Collaboration with IO-Informatics (along with Cornell, and UCSD) for the investigation of service-oriented architectures in life sciences research using Sentient software Aim to integrate several sources of information relating to Alzheimer’s Disease (brain imaging, morphology, gene expression) so that cross-dataset biomarkers can be identified Sentient usies Intelligent Multidimensional Objects (IMOs) to define and query data sources and the tools used to access them Still a browsing approach, but with a layer of coherence and “intelligence” Hope to expand to include chemistry data Can also be used as an interface-level tool

38. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 38

39. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 39

40. Indiana University School of David Wild – ECCR Meeting, October 2005. Page 40 Conclusions so far Effective exploitation of large volumes and diverse sources of chemical information is a critical problem to solve, with a potential huge impact on the drug discovery process Most information needs of chemists and drug discovery scientists are conceptually straightforward, but complex (for them) to implement All of the technology is now in place to implement may of these information need “use-cases”: the four level model using service-oriented architectures together with smart clients look like a neat way of doing this The aggregation and interface levels offer the most challenges In conjunction with grid computing, rapid and effective organization and visualization of large chemical datasets is feasible in a web service environment Some pieces are missing: –Chemical structure search of journals (wait for InChI) –Automated patent searching –Effective dataset organization –Effective interfaces, especially visualization of large numbers of 2D structures (we’re working on it!)