1. Date of download: 6/6/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Bilateral and Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy at Different Stimulus Intensities Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(5):425-434. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.5.425 Mean scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) at baseline, after 6 treatments, within 2 days of the last electroconvulsive therapy treatment, and 1 week after the last treatment in the randomized phase for the 4 groups (n = 20 for each group). Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 6/6/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Bilateral and Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy at Different Stimulus Intensities Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(5):425-434. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.5.425 Initial and final response rates for the 4 treatment groups (n=20 for each group) as a function of whether patients did not respond to an adequate trial prior to either right unilateral (RUL) or bilateral (BL) electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (medication resistant) or did not receive an adequate trial (not resistant). Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 6/6/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Bilateral and Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy at Different Stimulus Intensities Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(5):425-434. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.5.425 Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion of patients who remained well after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), for patients classified as medication resistant (n=34), and for patients who did not have an adequate medication trial prior to ECT (n=28). Figure Legend: