1. Directions for Active Living in South Australia Kirsten Potoczky SA Active Living Coalition

2. Presentation  Coalition – our role and projects  Northgate Master Plan and Project Details  Initial assessment of Northgate against Healthy By Design  Ongoing Coalition Involvement  Outcomes and Lessons Learnt  Directions for the Future

3. SA Active Living Coalition  Department of Health  Land Management Corporation  Department for Transport Energy and Infrastructure –Office for Cycling and Walking –TravelSmart  Office of Recreation and Sport  Heart Foundation  Planning Institute of Australia (SA Div)  Cancer Council of South Australia  Local Government Recreation Forum Plus specialist expertise available when necessary

4.  Our slice of the health ‘pie’ is supportive environments for physical activity  Well-planned neighbourhoods can increase the number of people who have a genuine convenient choice to walk or cycle to schools, shops, parks, services, facilities and public transport.  Responsibility for the design and creation of the built environment lie not only with health but also with urban planners, transport planners, local government, open space planners, developers, landscapers designers and others suits with sneakers are fashionable

5. SA Active Living Coalition  Our role: –A collaborative forum for the planning and coordination of active living in South Australia –The provision of advice and strategic direction in relation to active living  The Coalition is currently progressing two projects: – An analysis of the South Australian Planning System to identify the issues and opportunities that impact on the adoption of active living in this state –Pilot project - Northgate stage 3 Joint Venture (LMC and Canberra Investment Corporation) to integrate “active living principles” into a new residential development

6. Northgate Stage 3: Precinct 1  8 kilometres north of CBD, views to the city centre and Adelaide Hills  37 hectares with 8 hectares for senior living, to house approximately 2200 people  diversity of housing options for changing demographics and lifestyles.  detached and semi detached homes, mews housing, attached terraces and apartments including affordable housing.

8. Why are the Coalition involved? The Joint Venture committed to a range of community building initiatives including: –Using the Heart Foundation's Healthy by Design guidelines to foster a healthy and safe community –People and Placemaking Creating active open spaces including bike and walking paths Providing community focal points and a community garden Designing socially responsive and equitable housing opportunities to meet diverse socio-economic and senior needs

9. Initial Coalition involvement SKM review considered the –Landscape Masterplan –Urban Design Master Plan –Sustainability Management System –Community Plan  Some requirements of HBD are pre-design, design, post-design, on-going maintenance  Suitability of road network, general provision of parks and facilities could be evaluated

11. Design RequirementCommentLandscape Plan Urban Design Plan Community Plan SMSOverall Compliance On the pedestrian desire line, kerb cut- offs and splinter island breaks should be provided Require detailed design for proper evaluation No detail provided In principle ? Provide drinking fountains, bicycle parking and toilet facilities in open space as appropriate Appropriate locations cannot be determined until detailed designs are produced In principleNo landscape detail In principleNot addressed ? Provide seats at frequent intervals with space for people in wheelchairs. Seats with backs or armrests for older people. Requires detailed design for proper assessment In principleNo detailIn principle ?

12. Continuing work of the Coalition  Provide feedback to the JV on technical/landscape drawings  Identify planning issues outside the site that impact on active living opportunities for surrounding residents. Identifying opportunity for remedial action wherever appropriate  Identify opportunities for active living research at Northgate  Document the process involved in the Northgate Active Living project and develop as a case-study for further use by LMC

13.  Are cyclists/gophers to be directed to narrow path and through to median island?  Is the median path narrow for cyclists/gophers?  What does the median path link up to?  Bike parking at the mixed use area?  Does it fit with Council plans and guidelines?

15. Identifying opportunities  Vital questions: who plans, who designs, who pays, and who maintains?  Does it benefit as existing residents?  Does it tie in with regional planning for the Inner North?

16. Routes to City Schools Shops Klemzig Interchange Linear Park Routes for Beginners Intermediate Experienced Identified improvements for both walkers cyclists

19. What we’ve learnt  Timing of feedback –benefit of working with the project team in early stages of masterplanning so land uses and layouts are appropriate –in detailed design so physical elements are delivered.  Working with Council –Potential conflict points between active living policy vs Council requirements and budgets –Opening dialogue with the local Council Urban projects or co-ordinating group Get familiar with local plans and strategies

20. What we’ve learnt  Active living infrastructure –Costs of open spaces, bike paths etc –Lack one-size-fits-all approach to creating a successful environment blending cars/pedestrians/cyclists  Access to expertise from developers/service providers informing government policy Getting affordable housing up and running Running of community facilities Aged care housing

21. Outcomes – or how has a having a Coalition changed anything?  Who does what - contacts for government departments for both other departments, developer and Council. Better co- ordination across SA Govt  Keeping an active living focus as part of the detailed design process for Northgate Stage 3: Precinct 1 – feeding into greater area planning  Inclusion of health into LMC Sustainability and Innovations Strategy – open space and walking/cycling.  Identified evidence/research gaps eg open space in medium and higher density developments – commissioning of research

22. Into the future…  Working with stakeholders outside the site - retrofitting cycle, gopher and pedestrian infrastructure – shopping centre, schools etc  Taking results of research and incorporating them into –Government/Council/PIA/Heart Foundation policies –New KPI’s for developments  Working as early as possible in the creative process structure and regional planning – supported by Planning Review recommendations

23. Thank you