Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Analysis on IEEE 802.15.3c coexistence scheme Date: 2009-05-13 Authors:

Published byFrank Neal Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Analysis on IEEE 802.15.3c coexistence scheme Date: 2009-05-13 Authors:"— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Analysis on IEEE 802.15.3c coexistence scheme Date: 2009-05-13 Authors:

2 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 2 Abstract The following presentation analyzes the CMS (common mode signaling) Sync Frame based coexistence scheme of 802.15.3c.

3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 3 802.15.3c Coexistence 802.15.3c has following rules to promote coexistence among devices using different PHYs (based on the presentation 09/0370r2 [1]): –“The below rules on CMS usage are specified in the TG3c draft: An AV or an HSI PNC shall send a CMS sync frame in every superframe An AV or an HSI PNC shall be able to receive the CMS sync frame An SC PNC shall send CMS beacon in every superframe All SC DEV shall be able to send and receive signal in CMS –The specified rules indicate that all PHY modes are able to communicate with / detect each other using a commonly supported signaling scheme –Any new PNC seeking to start a piconet, shall initially perform channel scan. Upon receiving CMS beacon/sync frame from an already-active PNC, this new PNC will be aware of its existence and shall avoid interfering signal transmission” Only PNCs are mandated to support CMS sync frame but not DEVs –Not all DEVs can communicate with or detect others

4 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 4 802.15.3c Coexistence - Example Two overlapping piconets using different PHYs can coexist only if PNCs can hear each other’s CMS sync frame PNC1 (PHY1/CMS) DEV2 PNC2 (PHY2/CMS) DEV3 PNCs are within each other’s transmission range DEV1DEV4 PHY1 PHY2 Piconet 1 (PHY1)Piconet 2 (PHY2)

5 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 5 802.15.3c Coexistence Problem DEVs may interfere with each other if PNCs cannot hear each other’s CMS sync frame –PNCs out of transmission range –Large signal attenuation due to obstacles –Low antenna gain toward each other due to unfavorable antenna orientation Sync frame is optional feature for DEVs PNC1 (PHY1/CMS) DEV2 PNC2 (PHY2/CMS) Piconet 1 (PHY1)Piconet 2 (PHY2) PHY1 PHY2 PNCs are out of each other’s transmission range DEV1 DEV3 DEV4

6 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 6 Simulation Setup Matlab (ray tracing) Room configuration –Dimension (LxWxH) 6m x 12m x 3m –5 specular reflectors/piconet random location 2dB reflection loss PNC –Number of antennas = 1 patch antenna element (random orientation) –Transmit power = 10 dBm –Noise Figure=8 dB –Implementation loss=2 dB 6m PNC1PNC2 d m 12m 1m 3m Radiation pattern of a single patch antenna (peak gain ~ 3dBi) reflector Patch antenna

7 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 7 CMS Transmission Range Define CMS transmission range with 10% outage probability = Prob (SNR<7dB*) = 0.1 SNR distribution –CMS transmission range ~ 10m 6m PNC1PNC2 d m 12m 1m 3m reflector 7 dB *) SNR threshold 7dB from 09/0370r2[1]

8 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 8 Interference between Two Piconets 6m Tx range ~10m PNC1PNC2 d > 10 m DEV1 DEV2 DEV3 DEV4 12m D m Tow piconets using same channel DEV configuration –Heavy load traffic (e.g. wireless display) –1 antenna element case –16 antenna element case SINR degradation –1 antenna case: > ~5dB –16 antenna case: > ~10dB 10 dB 5 dB

9 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 9 Office Cubicle Environment Cubicle configuration –Dimension (LxWxH): 2.5m x 1.8m x 3m –5 specular reflectors/piconet (random location, 2dB reflection loss) –Partition wall: 3dB penetration loss CMS transmission range –10% outage prob. Prob(SNR<7dB) = 0.1 –Transmission range ~ 5m 1.8m PNC1PNC2 d m 2.5 m.5m.9m Office partition Penetration loss ~3dB 7 dB

10 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 10 Interference between Two Piconets Three piconets using same channel DEV configuration –Heavy load traffic (e.g. wireless display) –1 antenna element case –16 antenna element case SINR degradation –SINR measured at Piconet2 –1 antenna case: ~7dB –16 antenna case: ~12 dB 12 dB 7 dB 1.8m PNC1PNC2 2.5 m PNC3 Piconet1Piconet2 Piconet3 DEV1 DEV2 DEV3 DEV4 DEV5DEV6 ch#1 ch#2 ch#3 Channel number

11 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 11 10m Assume CMS sync frame can reach multiple cubicles Multiple piconets must share the time resource –reduces throughput/piconet Multiple piconets have to coordinate their schedules –Below example: 5 piconets operating in the same channel –Hard to achieve stable schedules (especially when one piconet has dynamic traffic) Problem of a Long CMS Transmission Range in a Dense Office Cubicle Environment Tx range ~ 10m PNC1 123 31 132 2 Channel number 3 3 2 2 1 1 3m

12 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 12 Conclusions 802.15.3c’s CMS sync frame based coexistence scheme is analyzed –CMS sync frame scheme works only when PNCs are within each other’s CMS transmission range –If the PNCs are out of each other’s transmission range, the DEVs start to interfere with each other –A long CMS transmission range may cause schedule instability problem It is a hard problem to address the coexistence between the networks using different PHYs

13 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 13 References [1] Common mode signaling (CMS) for intersystem coexistence enhancement, 09/0370r2, Shu Kato09/0370r2

Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/559r0 Submission May 2009 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Analysis on IEEE 802.15.3c coexistence scheme Date: 2009-05-13 Authors:"

Similar presentations

Doc.:IEEE 802.15-10-0745-03-0006 Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:

Doc.:IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0229r0 Submission February 2012 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Transmit Mask Correction Date: 2012-02-23 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0229r0 Submission February 2012 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Transmit Mask Correction Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE 802.11ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.

Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: 2014-11-03 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: 2014-09-11 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission October 2011 doc.:IEEE 802.11-11/1517r0 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Incorporated Efficient Device and Service Discovery for Peer-to-Peer (P2P)

Submission October 2011 doc.:IEEE /1517r0 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Incorporated Efficient Device and Service Discovery for Peer-to-Peer (P2P)
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide 1 802.11ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0782r0 Submission July 2009 Carlos Cordeiro, IntelSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Interference Mitigation in 60 GHz Date: 2009-07-14 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0782r0 Submission July 2009 Carlos Cordeiro, IntelSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Interference Mitigation in 60 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: 2013-17-09 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10-0485-01-00ad Submission May 2010 Chin-Sean Sum, NICTSlide 1 Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence Date: 2010-05-19 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE ad Submission May 2010 Chin-Sean Sum, NICTSlide 1 Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/1268r0 Submission November 2010 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Consumption Opportunity in Sub 1 GHz Date: 2010-11-08.

Doc.: IEEE /1268r0 Submission November 2010 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Consumption Opportunity in Sub 1 GHz Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0060r1 Submission January 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Capability Support for 802.11ah Date: 2011-01-17 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0060r1 Submission January 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Capability Support for ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1153r2 Submission November 2009 Carlos Cordeiro, IntelSlide 1 Motivation and Requirements on 60 GHz Beamforming Date: 2009-11-15 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1153r2 Submission November 2009 Carlos Cordeiro, IntelSlide 1 Motivation and Requirements on 60 GHz Beamforming Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE 802.11ad Date: 2010-05-17 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/0364r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Date: 2013-03-20 Authors: Antenna Array Gain from Measured Data for 802.11n/ac.

Doc.: IEEE /0364r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Date: Authors: Antenna Array Gain from Measured Data for n/ac.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1210r1 Submission Nov 2009 Tuncer Baykas, NICT.Slide 1 Energy Detection vs Common Mode Signaling Detection for Coexistence Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1210r1 Submission Nov 2009 Tuncer Baykas, NICT.Slide 1 Energy Detection vs Common Mode Signaling Detection for Coexistence Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/0723r1 SubmissionSlide 1 HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview Date: 2013-07-15 Authors: Minyoung Park (Intel Corp.) July 2013.

Doc.: IEEE /0723r1 SubmissionSlide 1 HEW SG Evaluation Methodology Overview Date: Authors: Minyoung Park (Intel Corp.) July 2013.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date: 2009-05-11.

Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
A Distributed Relay-Assignment Algorithm for Cooperative Communications in Wireless Networks ICC 2006 Ahmed K. Sadek, Zhu Han, and K. J. Ray Liu Department.

A Distributed Relay-Assignment Algorithm for Cooperative Communications in Wireless Networks ICC 2006 Ahmed K. Sadek, Zhu Han, and K. J. Ray Liu Department.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google