Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dallas 2015 TFQO: Name EVREVs: Names and #COI Taskforce: Name Insert Short PICO title Total of 12 (no studies) to 20 slides (maximum) using standard format.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Dallas 2015 TFQO: Name EVREVs: Names and #COI Taskforce: Name Insert Short PICO title Total of 12 (no studies) to 20 slides (maximum) using standard format."— Presentation transcript:

1 Dallas 2015 TFQO: Name EVREVs: Names and #COI Taskforce: Name Insert Short PICO title Total of 12 (no studies) to 20 slides (maximum) using standard format. Total presentation time 15 mins. Almost all information should be able to be cut and pasted from SEERs. Please delete these text boxes when not needed anymore. Essential slide. Estimated presentation time 20 sec

2 Dallas 2015 COI Disclosure (specific to this systematic review) Commercial/industry List here Potential intellectual conflicts List here Essential slide if no simultaneous projection. Estimated time <30 sec

3 Dallas 2015 2010 CoSTR Please provide the Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendation published in the 2010 International Consensus on CPR and ECC Science with Treatment Recommendations (paste from SEERs) if this topic was reviewed in 2010. If topic not reviewed, indicate no review in 2010. Essential slide. Paste from SEERs or CoSTR. Estimated time <30 sec

4 Dallas 2015 C2015 PICO Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcomes Essential slide. Paste from SEERs. Estimated time <30 sec

5 Dallas 2015 Inclusion/Exclusion & Articles Found List Inclusions/Exclusions Criteria Insert Number of Articles Finally Evaluated Essential slide. Paste (as picture or text) from SEERs. Estimated time <30 sec

6 Dallas 2015 2015 Proposed Treatment Recommendations Insert draft Treatment Recommendations from SEERs (including direction, strength of evidence grade and quality of evidence): eg. We recommend against X in comparison to Y for OHCA (strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). Values and preferences statement: In making this recommendation we place a higher value on not allocating resources to an ineffective intervention over any yet to be proven benefit for critical or important outcomes. For weak recommendation would use the word “suggest” instead of “recommend”. Recommendations can obviously be for or against routine or specific use. Essential slide. Paste from SEERs. Estimated time <30 sec This is going to help the audience evaluate your presentation and decide if the data supports it or not. Paste from SEERs

7 Dallas 2015 Risk of Bias in studies Essential slide(s). Either paste summary of bias assessments here (estimated time 30 sec), or use one slide for the bias assessment for each study included in your evidence profile tables (estimated time 5 sec per slide). Paste from SEERs.

8 Dallas 2015 Key data from key studies Optional slide(s). May use up to 3 slides (with <30 seconds each) to cover key data (given restrictions imposed by total time available to present topic). May refer to more than one citation per slide if necessary. Data could be pasted from SEERs. Reference P: I: C: O:

9 Dallas 2015 Evidence profile table(s) Essential slide. Estimated time <60 sec. One of up to 3 (maximum) Evidence Profile slides (in standard format) for all outcomes designated as “critical”. May refer to more than one question per slide if necessary. Could be pasted from word, GuidelineDevelopment.org or SEERs.

10 Dallas 2015 Proposed Consensus on Science statements Insert Summary statement(s) from SEERs* For the important outcome of “survival to hospital discharge” we have identified moderate quality evidence (downgraded for indirectness) from two RCTs enrolling 421 patients showing no benefit (OR 0.81 95% CI 0.33 – 2.01). We did not identify any evidence to address the critical outcome of “neurologically intact survival”. Essential slide (minimum of one slide). Estimated time <60 sec. Insert Summary statement(s) from SEERs.

11 Dallas 2015 Draft Treatment Recommendations Insert draft Treatment Recommendations from SEERs (including direction, strength of evidence grade and quality of evidence): eg. We recommend against X in comparison to Y for OHCA (strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). Values and preferences statement: In making this recommendation we place a higher value on not allocating resources to an ineffective intervention over any yet to be proven benefit for critical or important outcomes. For weak recommendation would use the word “suggest” instead of “recommend”. Recommendations can obviously be for or against routine or specific use. Essential slide (one or two slides only). Estimated time <60 sec. Insert draft Treatment recommendations from SEERs.

12 Dallas 2015 Knowledge Gaps (eg. ETT vs BVM) Other specific worksheets that would be helpful Relationship with training to ETT success Specific research required Adult ETT vs BVM Essential slide (one slide only). Estimated time <30 sec

13 Dallas 2015 Next Steps This slide will be completed during Task Force Discussion (not EvRev) and should include: Consideration of interim statement Person responsible Due date Essential slide (one slide only). Estimated time <30 sec


Download ppt "Dallas 2015 TFQO: Name EVREVs: Names and #COI Taskforce: Name Insert Short PICO title Total of 12 (no studies) to 20 slides (maximum) using standard format."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google