Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Towards modeling epigenetic phase variation of virulence factors

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Towards modeling epigenetic phase variation of virulence factors"— Presentation transcript:

1 Towards modeling epigenetic phase variation of virulence factors
Intro: there is a reason I am before Mustafa!! Towards, vs fait accompli Marjan van der Woude Centre for Immunology and Infection DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY

2 Expression of Virulence factors
Haraga 2008 Infectious dose Bottlenecks

3 Phase variation: Heritable yet reversible gene expression
Cell division Cell divisions Switch frequency restreak 1 in cells switch per generation lacZ reporter

4 Cells in a clonal population may never have identical phenotype
2. In absence of and despite of varying environmental conditions 1. Variable level of response within population Phase variation Results in heterogeneous clonal population with cells expressing (ON) and not expressing gene(OFF).

5 Why study population heterogeneity?
Interesting biology we may be missing: Host- pathogen /commensal interactions, interaction with (abiotic) environment, biofilms, resistance Losick lab Mention salmonellla mechanisms unknown! And coli….. If it is really that important should every pathogen have it or is this a reflection of the nature of interactions- which host, how long (vibrio short, etc) End argue that this is a fascinating but also critical towards understanding the behaviour of populations in natural environments- modeling disease Wider implications: Combating Infectious Disease Diagnostics, Epidemiology, Vaccine development

6 Biological significance of phase variation?
Evade the immune system ?Alters host pathogen interactions? OFF phase: loss of antigen leads to loss function - functional redundancy? Baumler ! A future event which is possible but can not predicted with certainty Bacillus subtilis (soil) (4.2 Mb genome) swrA gene (SSM) - swarming behavior Kearns DB, et al 2004 Mol Microbiol. 52: PV of adhesins: ?Facilitates bacterial dispersal? (from biofilms or colonized host tissue)

7 Phase variation: Heritable yet reversible gene expression
Cell division Cell divisions Switch frequency restreak 1 in cells switch per generation lacZ reporter

8 Reporter fusions to analyze PV: gfp: Green Fluorescent Protein
Also for Flow cytometry Alternatives: lux lacZ Native protein Single cells: overlay of phase contrast (all cells) and fluorescent image (ON cells, GFP+)

9 Analyze and Visualize an infrequent event
Microbial Challenge #1 Getting the data: Analyze and Visualize an infrequent event Lab vs during infection! Suitability -population, individual cells -lab, in vitro or infection model Sensitivity (need single copy for PV) Reporter relation to “native” protein?

10 Phase variation controlled by DNA methylation
(epigenetic) OxyR OFF -35 -10 GATCs Protein CDS promoter ON Protein CDS Dam Example: OxyR is a repressor but can only bind if 3 Dam target sequences (GATC) are unmethylated. Once OxyR is bound, Dam can not access GATC.

11 Competition DNA binding protein and processive enzyme
OFF UM ON METH Stochastic elements: competition, concentration of proteins (local and cellular) HM Competition DNA binding protein and processive enzyme Actual DNA and protein concentration (at site) [Kaminska et al 2010] Role passage DNA replication fork(s) [Kaminska et al 2010] Other growth related variables

12 Significance OxyR binding affinity
Role of each GATC OFF ON WTK12 GATC mutants x (NA locked Off) Altered switch frequency GATC-I mutant On to OFF especially altered: increased almost 10 fold Effect DESPITE sufficient OxyR x WTRS218 Altered switch frequency

13 Microbial Challenge #2 Microbial Challenge #3 Getting the data:
Acquiring relevant numerical data (low concentration proteins and enzyme) Lab vs during infection! Relevant: in cell vs in vitro! Microbial Challenge #3 Reduce complexity w/o oversimplifying (include DNA replication, growth?)

14 OxyR and Dam-dependent PV: variation on a theme
E. coli agn family OFF ON Salmonella enterica sp. gtr ON OFF Sarah Broadbent

15 “Molecular Rules” Dam-dependent PV?
ON OFF agn family Dam processivity- inter and intra? Location RNA polymerase DNA replication gtr family Agn- outer membrane protein family in E. coli Gtr- LPS modification operons in Salmonella Both with evidence of past horizontal (phage) transfer

16 Expression of gtr can affect Salmonellae serotyping >2500 serovars
Strain LT2 14028 DT104 SL1344 TR7095 Genus Species Subspecies Serotypes >98% of human clinical isolates Typhimurium Typhi Choleraesuis Paratyphi Enteriditis Enterica (I) Salamae (II) Arizonae (IIIa) Diarizonae (IIIb) Houtenae (IV) Indica (VI) Serotyping main way that outbreaks are characterized! Bongori (V) Salmonella Serotypes (Kauffmann-White scheme) Based on immunoreactivity of two surface antigens i) O Antigen (LPS) ii) H Antigen (Flagellar) Enterica

17 gtr operons modify the O-antigen
0.1 Enteritidus PT4_II Gallinarum_II Dublin_III Typhi CT18_II Typhi TY2_I Paratyphi A_I Typhimurium D23580_BTP1 Cholerasuis_II Infantis_II Cholerasuis_III Infantis_I Cholerasuis_I Hadar_1 Phage ST104 Phage ST64T Typhimurium DT104_III Paratyphi A_III * Phage P22 Hadar_II Typhimurium SL1344_II Typhimurium D23580_II Typhimurium DT10_I Typhimurium DT2_I Typhimurium LT2_II Choleraesuis_IV * Infantis_III Typhi CT18_I Typhi TY2_II Paratyphi A_II * Enteritidus PT4_I Gallinarum_I Typhimurium DT2_II Typhimurium LT2_I Typhimurium SL1344_I Typhimurium DT104_II Paratyphi B Typhimurium D23580_I Group 3 SPI16-like Group 4 Group 1 Group 2 ∆gtrA ∆gtrB gtrC (Pseudo gtrB) L C + increasing #O repeats ∆oafA ∆Lt2_I ∆Lt2_II WT ptac Lt2_1 Lipid-core LPS gel gtr P22 Glc:O1 1 6 oafA OAc:O5 gtrABC Lt2_I Glc:O122 1 4 Gal Rha Man Abe O4, O12 ? S. Typhimurium LT2 O-antigen Which gtr cluster conveys which O-serotype?

18 Model for gtr phase variation;Dam and OxyR
gtrA OxyR B OxyR C -10 -35 +1 OxyR A RNApol CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 gtrA OxyR C -10 -35 +1 OxyR A OxyR B OFF OxyR Broadbent et al 2010

19 modifies the O-antigen and phase varies
gtrABC: modifies the O-antigen and phase varies 0-4 copies of gtr-family operons per Salmonella genome (phage remnants) Also on phage genomes If 3 of 4 copies PV then one can have 8 phenotypic variants in a population just from the gtr family! Combine with PV of possibly as many as 11 adhesins ….. Rmeind: agn with 2 GATC’s: altered switch rates! (Neisseria PV over 210 variants theoretically possible!)

20 Predict PV rates / regulation based on DNA sequence and paramters?
WebLogo of 33 gtr regulatory regions identifies putative important elements Predict PV rates / regulation based on DNA sequence and paramters? Spacing closest two gatcs same as agn gatcII and gatcIII- mutate either of those in agn and loose phase variation OxyR half b.s.motif : ATAG/T.T…A.CTAT

21 Salmonella LPS modification project
BIOCHEMISTRY Relate genes to chemical modification ROLE OF MODIFICATION Host-Pathogen interactions From molecular stochastic events to how it effects host -pathogen stohcastic events MOLECULAR -Genome sequencing SEROTYPING -Improve ? Complete, Molecular diagnostics EXPRESSION -Phase variation /Regulated?

22 Can we predict Dam-dependent PV from DNA sequence
Can we predict Dam-dependent PV from DNA sequence? Any methylation dependent PV? * * LPS modification DNA methyl End : signficance virulence (and funding…???) * * * OxyR and Dam Lrp and Dam from van der Woude and Baumler, 2004

23 “Molecular Rules” Dam-dependent PV?
ON OFF agn family Dam processivity- inter and intra? Location RNA polymerase DNA replication gtr family Pap family Lrp, needs PapI

24 Devising and executing experiments within adhering to those wishes
Microbial Challenge #4 Testing relevance Choosing the strain and conditions that represent a natural situation of relevance Lab vs during infection! Relevant: in cell vs in vitro! Microbial Challenge #5 Devising and executing experiments within adhering to those wishes

25 Challenge(s) #6 What is enough data to make modeling feasible?
How to decide if modeling is a worthwhile endeavor for the system? If the system is the best for the modeling? Lab vs during infection! Relevant: in cell vs in vitro!

26 With previous support from NSF
Renata Kaminska Sarah Broadbent Mark Davies Matt Lakins previous lab members Support from With previous support from NSF Centre for Immunology and Infection DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY

27


Download ppt "Towards modeling epigenetic phase variation of virulence factors"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google