Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Academy Health Conference

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Academy Health Conference"— Presentation transcript:

1 Academy Health Conference
Better Provider Profiling: Adding Patient Risk Adjustment to Episodes Rong Yi, Senior Research Associate, DxCG Inc. Academy Health Conference June 6, 2004

2 Questions Keeping Us Up at Night:
The credibility of a provider profiling initiative depends largely on how well we can respond to the ‘my patients are sicker” objection. How much do patient comorbidities affect episode costs? Could we use the DCG Relative Risk Score that measures patient risk along with Medstat’s Episode Group method to more accurately determine expected costs? How do severity and risk-adjusted episodes change our provider profiling results?

3 Presentation Outline Project objectives Proposed methodology
Application to BCBS of South Carolina’s provider profiles Conclusions

4 MEGs Medstat’s Episodes Grouper
Look-back Episode Clean Period Lab Office Visit Prescription Hospital Admission Office Visit Office Visit Links together a patient’s claims into a clinically meaningful episode across care settings Calculates summary episode cost and utilization metrics Assigns a managing physician to the episode to support profiling Determines the disease stage of the episode (highest)

5 Diagnosis Information
DxCG’s DCG/HCC Models Clinical Categories DCG Model Diagnosis Information Age/Sex Patient Risk Scores Developed using regression methods on Medstat’s MarketScan database (commercial model) Model input includes demographic information and all diagnosis information (and/or drug information) for a patient for a period (typically a year) Assigns a set of risk scores to the patient that measures current and future risk (used for adjustment in profiling and predictive modeling).

6 DCG – Calculating a Patient’s Risk Score
year old male Condition Categories 5.71 Diabetes with renal manifestation 1.84 Congestive heart failure 0.90 Acute myocardial infarction Vascular disease with complication 0 Vascular disease hierarchy 18.09 Dialysis status … …… 0.46 Diabetes & congestive heart failure interaction ______ 29.34 Relative Risk Score Member ID: Name: John Smith Age: 54 Sex: M Rel Risk Score:

7 How Much Should an Episode Cost? - Depends on the patient!
Average Episode Cost DCG Risk Score (Health Burden, 1.0 = Avg) Whole Patient Cost Next Year Risk-Adjusted Episode Cost 45 year old female Healthy $300 0.80 $1,500 ?? 55 year old male Early Chronic 2.40 $4,500 64 year old female Chronic with Complications 7.20 $12,500

8 Cost of Pneumonia and Patient Risk (DCGs)
Stage # of Episodes Episode Cost Avg DCG Risk Score 1 2 5 10 3,918 $286 2.88 1,345 841 904 389 439 $171 $246 $335 $378 $807 82 $350 2.66 34 14 9 11 $56 $166 $623 $368 $2,308 3 69 $310 2.60 43 8 4 $37 $118 $44 $89 $4,371 Overall 4,069 $296 2.87 DCG Risk Score Healthier..……………… Sicker

9 Cost of Chronic Diabetes Patient Risk (DCGs)
Stage # of Episodes Episode Cost DCG Risk Score 1 2 5 10 7,972 $354 3.01 2,856 1,900 1,969 962 485 $132 $308 $389 $536 $527 2,707 $1,133 5.32 587 599 776 371 374 $248 $562 $862 $1,815 $2,224 3 44 $1,604 9.62 15 13 $28 $113 $171 $1,726 $5,111 Overall 10,723 $556 3.62 DCG Risk Score Healthier..……………… Sicker

10 Overall Relationship between Episode Disease Stage and Patient Illness Burden
Ordinal Stage # of Episodes Mean Patient Risk Score Range 409,317 1.3 (0.1, 56.4) 1 962,946 2.1 (0.1, 52.5) 2 73,866 3.2 3 10,491 5.1 Table: mean RRS by disease stages, overall correlation between disease stage and RRS, overall correlation between RRS and cost of episode. (done) Stages are not comparable across MEGs, but broadly higher stages go with higher risk scores.

11 Risk-Adjusted Episodes in Provider Profiling
Problem: While episodes can be severity-adjusted, without adjusting for patient risk, there is the potential to unfairly reward physicians who care for patients with few co-morbid diseases and penalize those who effectively care for patients with significant disease burden. Proposed solution: Marry the patient-level risk scores from DxCG with the severity score within Medstat’s Episodes Grouper to fairly evaluate physicians and pay for the best performance. Medstat’s Episodes Grouper Severity-adjustment within Episode DxCG’s HCC Model Whole-patient Relative Risk Score Risk-adjusted Episodes

12 Developing the Risk-Adjusted Episode Model
MarketScan database Only complete episodes with enough time for claim run-out 20 million episodes in 2002 Regression models incorporating MEG Disease Stage DCG/HCC Prospective Relative Risk Score Predict episode cost within each MEG Representing roughly 1.5 million enrolled members, privately insured, about 60% in FFS, with diagnostic information from all sites of service, and with prescription drug benefits.

13 Improvements in Predictive Power (R2)
R2 measured at individual episode level.

14 Overview of BCBS of South Carolina’s Profiling Efforts
1+ million enrolled members Provider Contracting deals with over 1600 physicians Profiling effort began in 1998, using the MEGs. Profile specialists with more than 100 members on episode cost and use information and compare to specialist norms

15 Risk-Adjusted Episode Profile for Internal Medicine / General Practice
BASE BASE + DCG Managing Phys Episodes Mean Actual Mean Exp Perf Ratio Perf Ratio Change A 1,199 $413 $458 0.90 $439 0.94 -3.90% B 1,131 $433 $500 0.87 $507 0.86 -1.10% C 1,065 $451 $502 $504 -0.30% D 633 $746 $608 1.23 $566 1.32 9.10% E 704 $665 $486 1.37 $477 1.40 2.70% F 919 $495 $528 $487 1.02 7.80% G 835 $514 $478 1.08 $471 1.09 1.70% H 356 $1,091 $757 1.44 $974 1.12 -32.10% I 616 $629 $600 1.05 $632 1.00 5.30%

16 Performance Ratios by Physician
Performance ratios for most physicians (the ratio of actual $ / expected $) are similar between the two methods. Some physicians performance ratio changes significantly when we add patient risk to the adjustment. Adjusted using episode group and stage Adjusted using episode group, stage and patient risk Physician H moved from an outlier to practicing within expected range Physician D is even more of an outlier

17 Physician D – Drill Down
Episode Description Episodes Actual Payments Exp Payments (BASE) Exp (BASE+DCG) Actual RRS Expected Average RRS Other Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders 91 $373 $260 $264 1.58 2.13 Essential Hypertension, Chronic Maintenance 88 $640 $614 2.00 2.45 Other General Signs, Symptoms, and Conditions 47 $343 $366 $322 1.64 2.55 Other Ear, Nose, and Throat Infections 27 $158 $148 $141 1.46 1.97 Osteoarthritis 25 $2,443 $1,462 $1,139 1.78 2.82 Other Spinal and Back Disorders 21 $398 $505 $430 1.47 2.52 Other Respiratory Symptoms 19 $608 $776 $717 1.79 2.90 This physician’s patients have consistently lower illness burden than expected.

18 Physician H Drill Down Episode Description Episodes Actual Allowed Payments per Episode Exp Allowed Payments per Episode (MEG) Exp Allowed Payments per Episode (MEG & DCG) Actual RRS Exp Average RRS Essential Hypertension, Chronic Maintenance 40 $729 $620 $698 4.12 2.42 Other Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders 29 $485 $260 $264 2.04 2.13 Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Hyperglycemic States Maint 26 $1,656 $1,360 $1,478 6.1 3.7 Hernia, Hiatal or Reflux Esophagitis 12 $880 $501 $497 2.34 2.39 Renal Failure 9 $13,110 $2,992 $10,585 15.97 7.01 Angina Pectoris $1,180 $5,189 $4,622 3.4 4.78 Physician H moves from an outlier to within the norm due to treating more severely ill patients.

19 Conclusions Episode costs increase with the severity of the disease (MEG) and disease burden of the patient (RRS) Considerable variation in episode costs leaves room for risk adjustment Organizations can improve the accuracy of provider performance assessments using risk-adjusted episodes. This is important for ensuring equitable pay-for-performance. Plans are underway to incorporate risk-adjusted episodes into the Medstat’s standalone episode grouper and Advantage Suite.


Download ppt "Academy Health Conference"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google