1. Permitting and MVN MCM Overview
Regulatory Branch
Permitting and MVN MCM Overview

2. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY AUTHORITY IS BASED UPON
SECTION 10 OF THE RIVERS AND HARBORS ACT OF 1899 (RHA) AND
SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA).

3. SECTION 10 OF THE RIVERS AND HARBORS ACT OF 1899
AUTHORIZES THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY TO REGULATE ALL ACTIVITIES AND STRUCTURES IN NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION, EXCAVATION, OR DEPOSITION OF MATERIALS IN, OVER, OR UNDER SUCH WATERS, OR ANY WORK WHICH WOULD AFFECT THE COURSE, LOCATION, CONDITION, OR CAPACITY OF THOSE WATERS.

5. SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)
AUTHORIZES THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ACTING THROUGH THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, TO ISSUE PERMITS, AFTER NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC HEARING, FOR THE DISCHARGE OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES AT SPECIFIC DISPOSAL SITES.

6. Jurisdiction – Section 404 Clean Water Act
Definitions:
Fill Material – any material that has the effect of replacing an aquatic area with dry land or of changing the bottom elevation of a waterbody or wetland; includes rock, soil, dirt or similar materials.
Discharge of Fill Material – the addition of fill material into waters of the U.S.

9. THE CORPS JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS
THE LIMITS OF THE CORPS REGULATORY JURISDICTION ARE DEFINED AS:
NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE U.S. UNDER SECTION 10 OF THE RHA.
WATERS OF THE U.S. UNDER SECTION 404 OF THE CWA.

10. NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE US INCLUDE:
ALL WATERS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY USED, OR WERE USED IN THE PAST, OR MAY BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO USE IN INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE,
ALL WATERS SUBJECT TO THE EBB AND FLOW OF THE TIDE.

11. WATERS OF THE US INCLUDE:
ALL NAVIGABLE WATERS, INTERSTATE WATERS, TRIBUTARIES TO NAVIGABLE AND INTERSTATE WATERS, WETLANDS AND OTHER SPECIAL AQUATIC SITES, AND TERRITORIAL SEAS.

12. Department of the Army Permitting
Determine Jurisdiction
Define Project
Determine Work Type and Resource Impacts
Determine Type of Permit

13. Jurisdictional Determinations
Only the Corps of Engineers can make an official determination of waters of the US
Biologists at the Corps use technical manuals, guidance documents, and court decisions to make official determinations, majority of which for wetlands
1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual
Court Decisions (Rapanos and Carabell, SWANCC)
2008 Regional Supplement to Wetland Delineation Manual

14. Regulatory Definition of Wetlands
“Wetlands” are defined as:
those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.
CFR 328.3(b)

15. Three Diagnostic Characteristics of Wetlands
Hydrophytic Vegetation
Wetland Hydrology
Hydric Soils

18. Jurisdictional Determinations

20. Jurisdictional Determinations
Typically if the jurisdictional request is submitted by non-commercial entities and the site size is less than 5 acres, the Corps will provide a Corps Issued Determination for the site.
If the site size is 5 acres or more or the request is submitted by a commercial entity, then we may request data related to soils, vegetation, and hydrology necessary to identify wetlands. This field data is typically collected & submitted by a professional consultant.

21. Terminology
Jurisdictional Determination (JD) - tells you if you are in a Section 10 waterway or if waters of the US are present on your site for which you would need to apply for a 404 permit. These are appealable
Preliminary JD – Not Appealable, can use in permitting if applicant requests

22. JD Time Frames
A Corps issued determination (or delineation) is good for 5 years.
According to the most current information the New Orleans District is completing 60% of our determinations within 90 days or less.
*It is recommended to receive an approved JD prior to submittal of an application

23. PERMIT APPLICATION
Department of the Army Permit Application - ENG Form 4345
A vicinity map, a plan view and a cross section of the proposed work.
Joint Corps/Coastal Zone Application – Modified ENG Form 4345
Applications received are forwarded to the appropriate Section chiefs

24. Permit Evaluation Sections
- Eastern : Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines
St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. Tammany,
Washington
- Central : Ascension, St. John the Baptist,
East Baton Rouge, Tangipahoa
East Feliciana, West Baton Rouge
Iberville, West Feliciana, Livingston
St. Helena, St. James

25. Permit Evaluation Sections
- Western : Acadia, Evangeline, St. Martin, Allen Iberia, St. Mary, Assumption Jefferson Davis, Vernon, Avoyelles Lafayette, Terrebonne, Beauregard Lafourche, Vermillion, Calcasieu Pointe Coupee, Cameron, Rapides Concordia, St. Landry

26. Evaluation Section
The Section chiefs will make a preliminary determination on regulatory authority (CWA or RHA) and a cursory determination of permit type that may be applicable
Section chiefs then assign the application to one of the project managers within the section
The project managers will validate regulatory authority and qualified permit type, and make a completeness determination.

27. TYPES OF PERMITS NATIONWIDE (NWP)
REGIONAL/STATE PROGRAM GENERAL PERMITS (PGP)
LETTER OF PERMISSION (LOP)
INDIVIDUAL

28. NATIONWIDE PERMITS
Nationwide Permits are a type of general permit issued by the Chief of Engineers, and designed to regulate with little, if any, delay or paperwork certain activities with minimal impacts

29. Examples of Nationwide Permits
NWP 3 – Maintenance of Existing Structures
NWP 12 – Utility Line Activities
NWP 27 – Aquatic Habitat Restoration

30. Regional General Permits
General Permits are issued by the Corps District for certain similar activities that have minor impacts
The New Orleans District has 27 Regional General Permits

31. New Orleans District RGPs
NOD-2 Trenasse Maintenance
NOD-3 Foundation Pads for Drilling Barges in Open Water
NOD-29 Small Boat Slips and Appurtenances

32. PROGRAMMATIC PERMIT
Programmatic permits are a type of general permit founded on an existing state, local or other Federal agency program and designed to avoid duplication of that program. For the New Orleans District, PGPs in the Coastal Zone

33. Department of the Army Individual Permits
Activities which do not comply with any of the abbreviated procedures must be evaluated under individual permitting procedures.

34. PERMIT PROCESSING FLOWCHART FOR INDIVIDUAL PERMITS
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION COMPLETED.
PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION (IF NECESSARY).
APPLICATION SUBMITTED WITH COMPLETE PLANS.
PUBLIC NOTICE (PN) ISSUED.
INTERAGENCY FIELD TRIP (IF NECESSARY).

35. PERMIT PROCESSING FLOWCHART FOR INDIVIDUAL PERMITS (cont)
COMMENTS FROM PN SUBMITTED TO APPLICANT.
EVALUATION OF COMMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION BY REGULATORY PERSONNEL.
ISSUANCE OR DENIAL OF PERMITS FROM THE LOUISIANA DEPARTMENTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT (WHERE APPLICABLE).

36. PUBLIC NOTICE
A public notice will be issued for 15/20 days to allow the public, Federal and State agencies and other concerned parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed project.
All public notices are now on the internet

37. PERMIT EVALUATION
Review the project with regard to public interest factors listed in 33 CFR These factors are:
Conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people

38. EVALUATION …Cont. We will also consider:
Relative extent of public and private need of the project.
Practicability of using alternative sites and methods.
Extent and permanence of the anticipated beneficial and/or detrimental effects of the proposed work.

39. SEQUENCING FOR REDUCTION OF IMPACT
AVOIDANCE
MINIMIZATION
COMPENSATION

40. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Establishment
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
Preservation

41. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION APPROACHES
CONSOLIDATED
MITIGATION BANKS
IN-LIEU FEE
PERMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
DESIGNED TO MITIGATE A SPECIFIC , USUALLY SINGLE, IMPACT
In addition to the various types of compensatory mitigation, there are a few different approaches:
Project-specific - As name implies, a specific mitigation project designed to mitigate a specific project which we are currently evaluating. Permittee is accountable for implementation and success of mitigation.
Consolidated mitigation - Mitigation designed to mitigate a number of different projects. Includes mitigation banks and in-lieu fee arrangements.
Transfer of responsibility from permittee to sponsor
Consolidated mitigation, and in particular, mitigation banking, is what all the excitement is about and the primary topic of this talk.

42. Mitigation Rule 33 CFR Part 332 “Compensatory Mitigation For Losses Of Aquatic Resources”
Published in Federal Register/ Vol. 73, No. 70 / Thursday, April 10, 2008 / Rules and Regulations, pages – (111 pages)
Effective date June 10, 2008
Contains both the Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency regulations.
Preamble 76 pages
Corps regulations +17
EPA regulations +17

43. Mitigation Rule Provides for:
Greater predictability, transparency
Improved mitigation planning and site selection
Improved performance of compensatory mitigation projects
Possible reduction in permitting time
Flexibility of mitigation options
Increased public participation
Strongly encourages watershed approach

44. Principles in Final Rule
Mitigation sequence retained
avoid, minimize, compensate
Preference hierarchy for mitigation options:
Mitigation bank credits
In-lieu fee program credits
Permittee-responsible mitigation under a watershed approach
On-site and/or in-kind permittee-responsible mitigation
Off-site and/or out-of-kind permittee-responsible mitigation

45. Principles in Final Rule
District engineer is the decision-maker
Mitigation bank or ILF – responsibility to provide compensatory mitigation is transferred to the sponsor when permittee secures credits
Long-term management may be transferred to another entity
Performance standards ecologically-driven
Adaptive management – make fixes for successful performance

46. Principles in Final Rule
Watershed Approach (Recommended by National Research Council)
Strategic site selection to improve or maintain watershed functions
Use available watershed planning information
Consider type of mitigation, landscape position, and other factors to provide desired functions
Level of information and analysis commensurate with the scope of permitted activity
May use multiple sites – e.g., on-site for water quality, water storage; off-site for habitat
Allows preservation, riparian areas, and buffers – ALLOWABLE IF RESTRICTIVE CRITERIA ARE MET WITH LIMITED CREDITS FOR THESE OPTIONS.
Increases flexibility and options. Increased coordination with partners, applicants, local jurisdictions, agencies.

47. MVN MCM 2012
Corps of Engineers, New Orleans District’s Modified Charleston Method (MVN MCM)
Assessment model used to calculate adverse impacts to wetlands
MVN MCM is based on evaluation criteria weighted by their importance and selections within each factor.
A variation of existing methodology, Charleston Method, which is a mitigation assessment technique.

48. MVN MCM 2012
Based on methodology developed by the Charleston District included in their Standard Operating Procedure issued September 19, 2002.
Modified to account for
regional wetland type differences,
CEMVN’s “Mitigation Standard Operating Procedures”, and
33 CFR Part 332, “Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources”.

49. Applicability to Regulated Community
Allows applicants/agents to estimate compensatory mitigation requirements for various project scenarios (avoidance and minimization).
Provides a reliable tool for developers and planners to use in comparing mitigation options.
Provides a single model applicable to all wetland types.
Allows mixing of banking and permittee-responsible mitigation.
Has a credit calculation and accounting method applicable to all mitigation types (e.g. restoration, enhancement, preservation and creation).
Simplifies mixing of appropriate mitigation locations and types.

50. MVN MCM 2012 CEMVN prepared an MVN MCM Guidebook containing:
Definitions of terms used in the model
Discussions of the use of each worksheet
Definitions for each factor and option associated with that worksheet, and
Examples using each worksheet.
A copy of the MVN MCM Workbook and Guidebook can be obtained at RIBITS website, under Assessment Tools link for the New Orleans District (RIBITS link to follow)

51. MVN MCM Structure
MVN MCM workbook is an excel spreadsheet consisting of four worksheets:
“Summary Worksheet”,
“Impacts Worksheet”,
“Bank Worksheet”,
“Restoration Worksheet” and,
“Comments.”

52. Summary Worksheet No data entry required on the Summary Worksheet
Information is pulled from the Impact, Bank, and Restoration Worksheets

54. Impacts Worksheet
See Guidebook for details on factors and their values or in Workbook, hold mouse over red triangle
Enter Permit Number
Enter total number of acres impacted and select Impact HUC at the top of sheet
Enter acres impacted at the bottom of each area column used (Size in Acres (AA)), the total must equal to that entered at the top of Worksheet

56. Bank Worksheet Select the Bank
Select Yes or No if the Impact occurs within the Bank’s Service Area
Select the Kind and Location Factors
*The user should always utilize RIBITS to determine the credit availability at a Mitigation Bank

58. Restoration Worksheet
Enter Mitigation Project Name
Enter Mitigation Project Size including the acres for which the project will be requesting credit (roads, rights-of-way, drainage servitudes should not be included)
Select HUC
Similar to the Impacts Worksheet, the acres of each area must be entered at the bottom of each Area column, the total must equal the acreage entered at the top

60. Comments Worksheet
Comments Worksheet is provided for the user to justify selection of each factor.
A summary comment box is provided as well as space to provide text for each selection

62. www.mvn.usace.army.mil/ops/regulatory/Mit_program.asp or,
RIBITS
Regulatory In-lieu fee and Bank Information Tracking System
Nationalized compensatory mitigation database
Nationalized reporting and information repository
Permittees/Sponsors/Public has access
Go to our Compensatory Mitigation Page
or,

63. RIBITS NAVIGATION
Notice the Filter on the bottom left – Select New Orleans District
You can click on “existing banks” to select a bank for which you would like to view credit availability or view other information available to the general public.

64. REGULATORY BRANCH Special Projects Team
Policy Issues
Complex Permit Evaluations
Mitigation Banks
Surveillance and Enforcement Section
Enforcement
Jurisdictional Determinations
Eastern, Central, and Western Evaluation Sections
Permit Evaluations

65. KEY POINTS Section 10 of RHA – Navigable Waters (tidal)
Section 404 of CWA – waters of the U.S.
Section 10 covers structures and work within, under, and over navigable waters
Section 404 covers deposition of fill within waters of the US
Several types of permits – authorization dependant on impact
MVN MCM 2012 utilized to calculate adverse impacts to wetlands

66. Key Points
Department of the Army permit review process involves many facets in addition to wetlands
Sequencing: Avoid, Minimize, Compensate

67. Section Chief’s E-mail
Eastern ---Michael V. Farabee
Central ----Martin S. Mayer
Western---Ronnie W. Duke
Surveillance & Enforcement---Robert A. Heffner
Special Projects---James A. Barlow

68. Questions?
????????????????????????????????????????????????