1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. © Teas: Direct Test On Quality And Antioxidant Activity Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Morsy, MA IOS PRESS, SPECTROSCOPY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL; pp: 371-378; Vol: 16 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals http://www.kfupm.edu.sa Summary The manufactured teas may conveniently be divided into three classes: Green teas, Oolongs (delicate black teas), and Black Teas. Several indirect methods are employed to measure the antioxidant activity of tea extracts that is basically takes place by monitoring the inhibition of oxidation of a suitable substrate using the extracts of antioxidant materials from the studies systems. This study is concerned with the results of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy that is utilized to investigate several categories of green and black teas: Twining Green Tea (TGT) of London, Rabea Green Tea (RGT) of Saudia, Chinese Green Tea (CGT) of China, English Breakfast Tea (EBT) of Ahmed Tea-London, and Rabea Black Tea (RBT) of Saudia. Three EPR signals from all the studied samples are observed. The assignment of these signals will discussed and correlated with the quality of leaves. Mainly, two paramagnetic species are considered to be responsible for the observed EPR signals; manganese(II)-protein system of the leaves and a stable free radical of aromatic origin. The study will provide facts on the dependency of radical signal on the oxidative degradation procedures of the studied samples. The intensity and feature of Mn(II)-EPR-signal is found to be related to the disintegration of tea leaves. References: AMIOT MJ, 1995, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V43, P1132 BALENTINE DA, 1992, PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS F, V1, P102 BEINERT H, 1965, ADV ENZYMOL, V27, P105 BORISH ET, 1985, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V133, P780 BRUDVIG GW, 1989, ANNU REV BIOPHYS BIO, V18, P25 Copyright: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals; http://www.kfupm.edu.sa

2. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. © CHEN ZY, 1996, J AM OIL CHEM SOC, V73, P375 DEBUS RJ, 1992, BIOCHIM BIOPHYS ACTA, V1102, P269 EDWIN N, 1997, JAOCS, V74, P10 FRANKEL EN, 1993, TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH, V4, P220 GRISHAM CM, 1979, ADV INORG BIOCHEM, P195 GRISHAM CM, 1980, ACS SYM SER, V142, P490 HARA Y, 1994, FOOD PHYTOCHEMICALS, V2, P34 HARA Y, 1995, FOOD REV INT, V11, P435 HECHT HG, 1967, MAGNETIC RESONANCE S, P131 HEINONEN M, 1998, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V46, P917 HERTOG MGL, 1993, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V41, P1242 HUNG Y, 2002, IN PRESS FOOD CHEM JANKUN J, 1997, NATURE, V387, P561 JEZIERSKI A, 2000, SPECTROCHIM ACTA A, V56, P379 JEZIERSKI S, 2000, APPL MAGN RESON, V18, P127 KADER F, 1998, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V46, P60 KATIYAR SK, 1992, CANCER RES, V52, P6890 KEVIN R, 1999, FOOD CHEM, V66, P401 KHALED M, 1999, 218 NAT M AM CHEM SO, V39, P50 LIN WZ, 1998, RADIAT PHYS CHEM, V53, P425 MAATSUZAKI T, 1985, J AGR CHEM SOC JAP, V59, P129 MARINOVA EM, 1996, FOOD CHEM, V56, P139 MICHIKO K, 1995, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V43, P200 MORSY MA, 2001, 24 INT EL PAR RES S MORSY MA, 2001, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V49, P683 MORSY MA, 2002, SPECTROCHIM ACTA A, V58, P1271 PEDERSEN JA, 2000, BIOCHEM SYST ECOL, V28, P229 PRYOR WA, 1983, SCIENCE, V220, P425 REED GH, 1970, J BIOL CHEM, V245, P662 REED GH, 1971, BIOCHEMISTRY-US, V10, P3190 SCHMELTZ I, 1977, ANAL CHEM, V49, P1924 SERAFINI M, 1996, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V50, P28 VILLAFRANCA JJ, 1976, BIOCHEMISTRY-US, V15, P544 YEN GC, 1994, J FOOD PROTECT, V57, P54 ZANDI P, 1999, FOOD CHEM, V64, P285 ZHAO JF, 1999, PHOTOCHEM PHOTOBIOL, V70, P637 For pre-prints please write to: abstracts@kfupm.edu.sa Copyright: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals; http://www.kfupm.edu.sa