Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Motivating the Gifted Underachiever. Instructional Strategies ControlChoiceChallengeComplexityCaring Flexible Grouping XXXXXX Curriculum Compacting XXXXXX.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Motivating the Gifted Underachiever. Instructional Strategies ControlChoiceChallengeComplexityCaring Flexible Grouping XXXXXX Curriculum Compacting XXXXXX."— Presentation transcript:

1 Motivating the Gifted Underachiever

2 Instructional Strategies ControlChoiceChallengeComplexityCaring Flexible Grouping XXXXXX Curriculum Compacting XXXXXX Tiered Assignments XXXXXX Independent Study XXXXXX Honors Classes XXXXX Pre-assessment XXXXX Higher-level Thinking Tasks XXXXXX Creative Thinking Tasks XXXXXX Project-based Learning XXXXXX

3 Flexible Grouping and Curriculum Compacting 1.Flexible Grouping  Interest  Achievement level  Activity  Learning preference  Special needs 2.Curriculum Compacting (skill work)  Used in conjunction with pre-assessment  Skills already mastered are removed  Time for independent study/projects

4 3. Tiered assignments—R. Cash  Tiered assignments are used when all students are focused on the same content, essential understandings, or key skiills, but students work on parallel tasks that vary based on readiness, interests, or learning.  Tier A – structured, teacher-directed  Tier B – little prompting to organize ideas  Tier C – challenging, open-ended, student- selected Tiered assignments are used in lessons when all students are focused on the same content, essential understandings, or key skills, but students work on parallel tasks that vary based on readiness, interests, or learning profile. Tier A – structured, teacher- directed Tier B – little prompting to organize ideas Tier C – challenging, open- ended, student-selected

5 4. Pre-assessment Frequent assessment guides instruction. Formal and informal Pre-, formative, and summative Types of Pre-assessment The T-W-H Chart (Think I know, Want to know, How I would like to learn about it) Open-ended Writing (5-minute time limit) End-of-unit or chapter assessment as pretest Learning Preference and Interest Inventories Five Most Difficult Questions (timed, of course)

6 Other High-impact Strategies to Personalize Education  Exploration of student interests  Pre-assessment of student content knowledge  Career exploration  Real-world experiences  Study and organizational skill instruction  Educational time spent with other capable students

7 In the Classroom…  Show acceptance and caring  Focus on the positive and on strengths.  Keep problems private.  Maintain contact with parents/guardians.  Keep student involved and interested; focus on process as well as the product  Provide variety and choice

8 In Our Classroom continued  Keep your expectations high and the learning rigorous.  Provide models of work expected  Provide descriptive feedback  Teach student to self-assess  Use recovery, redo, and do-over points  Enlist student in record-keeping  Utilize one-on-one conferences

9 In Our Classroom continued  Adjust your curriculum to make learning appropriate and relevant.  Create challenge, variety and opportunity for students to utilize strengths and interests to improve school performance and facilitate in- depth learning.

10 THERE IS HOPE! “Children are not born underachievers. Underachievement is learned, therefore it can be unlearned.” (Davis and Rimm, 2004, p. 317)

11 Source: Kristen Seward Purdue University, Educational Studies Gifted Education Resource Institute

12 Resources  Heacox, D. and Cash, R. (2014). Differentiation for Gifted Learners.  Hoover-Schultz, B. (2005). Gifted underachievement: Oxymoron or enigma? In Johnsen, S. & Kendrick, J. (Eds.) Teaching Strategies in Gifted Education. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.  Long, C. (2013). Are we failing gifted students? National Education Association. http://neatoday.org/2013/09/18/are-we-failing-gifted-students/  McCall, R.B., Evahn, C., & Kratzer, L. (1992). High School Underachievers: What Do They Achieve As Adults? Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.  Peterson, J.S. (2000). A Follow-Up Study of One Group of Achievers and Underachievers Four Years After High School Graduation. Roeper Review, 22(4), 217-224,  Peterson, J.S. & Colangelo, N. (1996). Gifted Achievers and Underachievers: A Comparison of Patterns Found in School Files. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 399-407.  Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-170.  The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. (2008). Issue brief: Gifted and talented students at risk for underachievement. Washington, D.C.: Learning Point Associates and SEDL for the U.S. Department of Education.


Download ppt "Motivating the Gifted Underachiever. Instructional Strategies ControlChoiceChallengeComplexityCaring Flexible Grouping XXXXXX Curriculum Compacting XXXXXX."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google