Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Common Solutions Group January 9, 2001 CorporateTime Calendaring.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Common Solutions Group January 9, 2001 CorporateTime Calendaring."— Presentation transcript:

1 Common Solutions Group January 9, 2001 CorporateTime Calendaring

2 Agenda  1300-1400Intro & Roadmap  1400-1430Synchronization & Client Issues Client Demos - Georgetown Issues like Offline Mode: Passwords, Sync Small presentation on CorporateTime’s new standards based approach to synchronization followed by a short Q&A session  1430-1500Mgmt / Admin Small presentation on CorporateTime’s Management (deployment, administration, etc) followed by open discussion Possible Discussion Topics Roaming Users issues Handling Client Upgrades Interest in SNMP monitoring Desired server utilities

3 Agenda (cont’d)  1500-1530Authentication Small presentation on CorporateTime’s authentication abilities followed by open discussion Possible Discussion Topics Preferred authentication for web applications LDAP and Kerberos Kerberos 5 Microsoft Kerberos  1530-1545Break Break Break  1545-1615External Calendar Users Small presentation on CorporateTime’s standards based approach for handling external users followed by a short Q&A session  1615-1645Groups & ACLs Dynamic/Static Groups in LDAP Users to be a group of 1 Access Rights to use Groups as well

4 Agenda (cont’d)  1645-1715Open Discussion Possible Topics Standards and IETF update Portals WAP and wireless Windows CE Future CSG / Steltor partnership JA-SIG  1715-1800Misc & Wrap-up  1800Close & go to Dinner  1830-1930Cocktails Outside the Ambassador Ballroom in the pre-function area  1930-2130Dinner Ambassador Center Ballroom

5 Who should be here …  Brown  CMU  Chicago  Colorado  Cornell  Duke  Georgetown  Harvard  Maryland  MIT  Michigan  PSU  Princeton  Stanford  UCOP  Virginia  Washington  Wisconsin

6 Quick Questions  Once around the horn – name/school  CT in Production?  Migrated from? MM? G/W? Other?  Considering CT?  CT for students? Deployed?

7 Quick Questions  Who likes the name Steltor and can say it public?  We are not here for vendor bashing!

8 Groups and ACLs Architectural changes?

9 Dynamic Groups  Based on attributes found in a directory  Sometimes referred to as groups by searching  At Georgetown, we expect some 15K of these

10 Static Groups  Useful for ad-hoc associations  Performance problems for large groups

11 Architectural Change  Groups are everything – everything is a group  A user is a group of 1… can change at any time  Dynamic subscription – becoming part of a group gets you that groups events.  Applies to external users as well

12 Access Lists -- Permissions  When you groupify everything… ACLs become very powerful as well.  In fact, most of the previous to allow for more powerful Access Rights in CT


Download ppt "Common Solutions Group January 9, 2001 CorporateTime Calendaring."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google