Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Social Science and Racial Discrimination Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka Kansas.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Social Science and Racial Discrimination Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka Kansas."— Presentation transcript:

1 Social Science and Racial Discrimination Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka Kansas

2 The Doll Study Compared black children from southern, segregated schools to black children from northern integrated schools Compared black children from southern, segregated schools to black children from northern integrated schools Children asked questions to indicate preference, knowledge of racial differences, and racial self identification Children asked questions to indicate preference, knowledge of racial differences, and racial self identification

3 Design Problems Cohort Effects Does the experiment tell us more about the difference between north and south?

4 Design Problems Cohort Effects Does the experiment tell us more about the difference between north and south? Applicability What does this study tell us about the difference between black and white children? What does this study tell us about the difference between black and white children?

5 Design Problems Cohort Effects Does the experiment tell us more about the difference between north and south? Applicability What does this study tell us about the difference between black and white children? What does this study tell us about the difference between black and white children? Not Blind Are the results reliable? Are the results reliable?

6 Design Problems What can we learn from the results? Does it matter that the experiments get different responses when they ask for “colored” dolls versus “negro” dolls?

7 Are Northern children even better off?

8 Was this ethical?

9 The Coloring Test 1. Color this little boy (or girl) the color you are. 2. This is a little boy (or girl). Color him (or her) the color you like little boys (or girls) to be.

10 Results Most children give “reality” response, while some give “phantasy” or “irrelevant” responses. Most children give “reality” response, while some give “phantasy” or “irrelevant” responses. Northern children are slightly less likely to give reality responses. Northern children are slightly less likely to give reality responses. Northern children are much less likely to choose brown as their color of preference. Northern children are much less likely to choose brown as their color of preference.

11 Design Problems Again, no white group for comparison. Again, no white group for comparison.

12 Design Problems Again, no white group for comparison. Again, no white group for comparison. No way to attribute differences between groups to integration/segregation. No way to attribute differences between groups to integration/segregation.

13 Why was this evidence admitted?

14 The Aftermath Riddick v. The School Board of the City of Norfolk Riddick v. The School Board of the City of Norfolk *Once school districts are given “unitary status” they are treated as if they had never been segregated. *Evidence of “white flight” is admitted as a government interest in favor of the end of bussing. *Evidence of “white flight” is admitted as a government interest in favor of the end of bussing.


Download ppt "Social Science and Racial Discrimination Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka Kansas."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google