1. 1 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 WP2 - Methodology ISS e G Integrated Site Security for Grids Methodology for Site Security Assessment Lionel Cons CERN

2. 2 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Proposed Methodology (inputs on the left came initially from ISO-17799)

3. 3 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Step 1 – Find The Assets  Asset = Anything that has value to the organization [ISO]  Five identified asset categories:  Organizational (intellectual property rights, public image…)  Human  Information / data (administrative, personal, physics…)  Service (network, authentication, email, office…)  Hardware  These are currently merged with “security requirements”

4. 4 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Baseline Assets  Preliminary list of asset types likely to be present everywhere:  Locally managed PC  Network  Backup  Office servers  Application servers  Centralized authentication

5. 5 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Specific Assets  Preliminary list of asset types that may be site specific:  Expensive and/or dangerous equipment  Provide services across Internet  Local email service  Exchange confidential data  Stores confidential information  High-availability services  Internal resources available to visitors  External users  Centralized backup service

6. 6 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Step 2 – Find The Threats  Threat = Potential cause of an unwanted incident, which may result in harm to a system or organization [ISO]  A generic list of threats has been compiled  Around 50 threats identified  Need to set the relevance of each threat for the given site  Linked to the role profiles (user / admin / developer / manager) and the asset types

7. 7 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Examples of Threats Threat IdThreat descriptionRelevance 1 T1Faulty access rights management3 T2Password compromising3 T3Intrusion by scanning techniques3 T4Intrusion (unauthorized network access)3 T5Data interception techniques (sniffing/man in the middle attacks,...)3 T6Fraudulent connection (theft of credentials)3 T7Exploiting software vulnerabilities3 T8Fraudulent use of systems (misappropriation…)3 T9Repudiation (system usage)3 T10Repudiation (sending/receiving of data)3 T11Saturation of resources (accidental)3 T12Saturation of resources (intentional - denial of service)3 T13Software alteration (time bomb, worm, trojan, virus…)3 T14Theft of mobile equipment or media3 T15Propagation of false or misleading information3 T16Use of insecure/unauthorized software3 T17Hardware failure (computer, storage device, network equipment…)3 T18Hardware malfunction3 T19Software malfunction3 T20Network failure (cabling, network device…)3

8. 8 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Step 3 – Find The Risks  Risk = Combination of the probability of an event and its consequence [ISO]  We focus on threats  Threats are linked to asset types  Need to know the relative importance of the asset types  Threats are linked to controls (aka mitigation techniques)  Need to know how well the controls are applied  We could look at “best practices” too

9. 9 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Examples of Controls (based on ISO 17799)

10. 10 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Examples of Controls (based on ISO 17799)

11. 11 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Examples of Controls (based on OCTAVE) 1. Security Awareness and Training Step 3a StatementTo what extent is this statement reflected in your organization? Staff members understand their security roles and responsibilities. This is documented and verified. Very MuchSomewhatNot At AllDon’t Know There is adequate in-house expertise for all supported services, mechanisms, and technologies (e.g., logging, monitoring, or encryption), including their secure operation. This is documented and verified. Very MuchSomewhatNot At AllDon’t Know Security awareness, training, and periodic reminders are provided for all personnel. Staff understanding is documented and conformance is periodically verified. Very MuchSomewhatNot At AllDon’t Know Staff members follow good security practice, such as  securing information for which they are responsible  not divulging sensitive information to others (resistance to social engineering)  having adequate ability to use information technology hardware and software  using good password practices  understanding and following security policies and regulations  recognizing and reporting incidents Very MuchSomewhatNot At AllDon’t Know

12. 12 I ntegrated S ite S ecurity for G rids www.isseg.eu WP2 – Site Assessment Methodology, 20 June 2007 Step 4 – Find The Countermeasures  Step 3 gives a prioritized list of threats  From threats, we can link to recommendations and best practices  Step 3 also gives the list of controls that can be improved and have a high impact on the overall security  From controls, we can also link to recommendations and best practices