1. Statistical Template-Based Object Detection A Statistical Method for 3D Object Detection Applied to Faces and Cars Henry Schneiderman and Takeo Kanade Rapid Object Detection using a Boosted Cascade of Simple Features Paul Viola and Michael Jones Presenter: Derek Hoiem CS 598, Spring 2009 Feb 24, 2009 Some slides/figures from www.cs.cmu.edu/~efros/courses/AP06/presentations/Schneiderman-Kanade%20Viola-Jones%20presentation.ppt

2. Goal: Detect all instances of objects

3. Influential Works in Detection Sung-Poggio (1994, 1998) : ~1260 – Basic idea of statistical template detection (I think), bootstrapping to get “face-like” negative examples, multiple whole-face prototypes (in 1994) Rowley-Baluja-Kanade (1996-1998) : ~2700 citations – “Parts” at fixed position, non-maxima suppression, simple cascade, rotation, pretty good accuracy, fast Schneiderman-Kanade (1998-2000,2004) : ~1150 – Careful feature engineering, excellent results, cascade Viola-Jones (2001, 2004) : ~4400 – Haar-like features, Adaboost as feature selection, very fast, easy to implement Dalal-Triggs (2005) : ~400 – Careful feature engineering, excellent results, HOG feature, online code Felzenszwalb-McAllester-Ramanan (2008)? 8 citations – Excellent template/parts-based blend

4. Sliding window detection … …

5. What the Detector Sees

6. Statistical Template Object model = log linear model of parts at fixed positions +3+2-2-2.5= -0.5 +4+1+0.5+3+0.5= 10.5 > 7.5 ? ? Non-object Object

7. Design challenges Part design – How to model appearance – Which “parts” to include – How to set part likelihoods How to make it fast How to deal with different viewpoints Implementation details – Window size – Aspect ratio – Translation/scale step size – Non-maxima suppression

8. Schneiderman and Kanade

9. Parts model Part = group of wavelet coefficients that are statistically dependent

10. Parts: groups of wavelet coefficients Fixed parts within/across subbands 17 types of parts Discretize wavelet coefficient to 3 values E.g., part with 8 coefficients has 3^8 = 6561 values

11. Part Likelihood Class-conditional likelihood ratio Estimate P(part|object) and P(part | non- object) by counting over examples Adaboost tunes weights discriminatively

12. Training 1)Create training data a)Get positive and negative patches b)Pre-process (optional), compute wavelet coefficients, discretize c)Compute parts values 2)Learn statistics a)Compute ratios of histograms by counting for positive and negative examples b)Reweight examples using Adaboost, recount, etc. More on this later

13. Training multiple viewpoints Train new detector for each viewpoint.

14. Testing 1)Processing: a)Lighting correction (optional) b)Compute wavelet coefficients, quantize 2)Slide window over each position/scale (2 pixels, 2 1/4 scale) a)Compute part values b)Lookup likelihood ratios c)Sum over parts d)Threshold 3)Use faster classifier to prune patches (cascade)… more on this later 4)Non-maximum suppression

15. Results: faces 208 images with 441 faces, 347 in profile

16. Results: cars

17. Results: faces today

18. Viola and Jones Fast detection through two mechanisms

19. Integral Images “Haar-like features” – Differences of sums of intensity – Millions, computed at various positions and scales within detection window Two-rectangle featuresThree-rectangle featuresEtc. +1

20. Integral Images ii = cumsum(cumsum(Im, 1), 2) x, y ii(x,y) = Sum of the values in the grey region How to compute A+D-B-C? How to compute B-A?

21. Adaboost as feature selection Create a large pool of parts (180K) “Weak learner” = feature + threshold + parity Choose weak learner that minimizes error on the weighted training set Reweight

22. Sidebar: Adaboost

23. Adaboost

24. “RealBoost” Figure from Friedman et al. 1999 Important special case: h t partitions input space: alpha t

25. Adaboost: Immune to Overfitting? Test error Train error

26. Interpretations of Adaboost Additive logistic regression (Friedman et al. 2000) – LogitBoost from Collins et al. 2002 does this more explicitly Margin maximization (Schapire et al. 1998) – Ratch and Warmuth 2002 do this more explicitly

27. Adaboost: Margin Maximizer margin Test error Train error

28. Interpretations of Adaboost Rosset Zhu Hastie 2004 – Early stopping is form of L1-regularization – In many cases, converges to “L1-optimal” separating hyperplane – “An interesting fundamental similarity between boosting and kernel support vector machines emerges, as both can be described as methods for regularized optimization in high-dimensional predictor space, utilizing a computational trick to make the calculation practical, and converging to margin-maximizing solutions.”

29. Back to recognition

30. Cascade for Fast Detection Examples Stage 1 H 1 (x) > t 1 ? Reject No Yes Stage 2 H 2 (x) > t 2 ? Stage N H N (x) > t N ? Yes … Pass Reject No Reject No Choose threshold for low false negative rate Fast classifiers early in cascade Slow classifiers later, but most examples don’t get there

31. Viola-Jones details 38 stages with 1, 10, 25, 50 … features – 6061 total used out of 180K candidates – 10 features evaluated on average Examples – 4916 positive examples – 10000 negative examples collected after each stage Scanning – Scale detector rather than image – Scale steps = 1.25, Translation s to 1.5s Non-max suppression: average coordinates of overlapping boxes Train 3 classifiers and take vote

32. Viola Jones Results MIT + CMU face dataset

33. Schneiderman later results Viola-Jones 2001 Roth et al. 1999 Schneiderman- Kanade 2000 Schneiderman 2004

34. Speed Schneiderman-Kanade: 1 minute for 3 viewpoints Viola-Jones: 15 fps for frontal

35. Important Ideas and Tricks Excellent results require careful feature engineering Speed = fast features (integral image) + cascade Adaboost for feature selection Bootstrapping to deal with many, many negative examples

36. Occlusions? A problem Objects occluded by > 50% considered “don’t care” PASCAL VOC changed this

37. Strengths and Weaknesses of Statistical Template Approach Strengths Works very well for non-deformable objects: faces, cars, upright pedestrians Fast detection Weaknesses Not so well for highly deformable objects Not robust to occlusion Requires lots of training data

38. SK vs. VJ Schneiderman-Kanade Wavelet features Log linear model via boosted histogram ratios Bootstrap training Two-stage cascade NMS: Remove overlapping weak boxes Slow but very accurate Viola-Jones Similar to Haar wavelets Log linear model via boosted stubs Bootstrap training Multistage cascade, integrated into training NMS: average coordinates of overlapping boxes Less accurate but very fast

39. BB discussion http://www.nicenet.org/ICA/class/conf_topic_ show.cfm?topic_id=643240