Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM and MIRAGE Steve Ghan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Jean-Francois Lamarque, Peter Hess, and Francis Vitt, NCAR.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM and MIRAGE Steve Ghan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Jean-Francois Lamarque, Peter Hess, and Francis Vitt, NCAR."— Presentation transcript:

1 Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM and MIRAGE Steve Ghan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Jean-Francois Lamarque, Peter Hess, and Francis Vitt, NCAR

2 Indirect Effects Physics N k = droplet number mixing ratio in layer k A k = droplet loss by autoconversion of droplets C k = droplet loss by collection by precipitation E k = droplet loss by evaporation S k = droplet nucleation source in layer k

3 Indirect Effects Physics N k = droplet number mixing ratio in layer k A k = droplet loss by autoconversion of droplets C k = droplet loss by collection by precipitation E k = droplet loss by evaporation S k = droplet nucleation source in layer k f = cloud fraction w = updraft velocity N n = number nucleated (parameterized in terms of w and aerosol) p ( w ) = probability density function of w w * = σ w = characteristic updraft velocity in growing part of cloud

4 Indirect Effects Physics N k = droplet number mixing ratio in layer k A k = droplet loss by autoconversion of droplets C k = droplet loss by collection by precipitation E k = droplet loss by evaporation S k = droplet nucleation source in layer k f = cloud fraction w = updraft velocity N n = number nucleated (parameterized in terms of w and aerosol) p ( w ) = probability density function of w w * = σ w = characteristic updraft velocity in growing part of cloud 2nd IE: Autoconversion connected to droplet number. 1st IE:

5 CAM and MIRAGE

6 CAM Aerosol Properties

7 Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects Two simulations: 1.All aerosol sources 2.All sources except anthropogenic sulfate Each simulation calculates radiative fluxes with (F aer ) and without aerosol (F noaer ).

8 Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects Two simulations: 1.All aerosol sources 2.All sources except anthropogenic sulfate Each simulation calculates radiative fluxes with (F aer ) and without aerosol (F noaer ). Direct effect of all aerosol in a simulation is F direct = F aer - F noaer.

9 Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects Two simulations: 1.All aerosol sources 2.All sources except anthropogenic sulfate Each simulation calculates radiative fluxes with (F aer ) and without aerosol (F noaer ). Direct effect of all aerosol in a simulation is F direct = F aer - F noaer. Difference between simulations is . Then  F direct =  F aer -  F noaer

10 Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects Two simulations: 1.All aerosol sources 2.All sources except anthropogenic sulfate Each simulation calculates radiative fluxes with (F aer ) and without aerosol (F noaer ). Direct effect of all aerosol in a simulation is F direct = F aer - F noaer. Difference between simulations is . Then  F direct =  F aer -  F noaer  F indirect =  F aer -  F direct =  F noaer

11 IE, DE with 2nd IE CAM tau=0, MIRAGE nudge

12 No 2nd indirect effect

13 No nudging

14 Change LWP w/, w/o nudging  lwp cam no2ndindir, mirage no2ndindir nudge, mirage no2ndindir nonudge

15 Zonal mean IE

16 Dlwp vs indirect effect

17 Ndrop cam, mirage Ndrop cam progaer no2ndindir tau=0 Mirage prognaer no2ndindir nudge Anthro, noanthro

18 Ccn3 cam, mirage, anthro, noanthro CCN3 cam progaer no2ndindir tau=0 Mirage prognaer no2ndindir nudge Anthro, noanthro

19 Ndrop cam updraft spectrum mirage updraft spectrum

20 DE, IE cam updraft spectrum

21 Background aerosol

22 Noanthro ccn3 cam tau=0,0.01, 0.02 Noanthro [CCN3] cam progaer no2ndindir tau=0, 0.01, 0.02 Mirage prognaer no2ndindir nonudge

23 IE, DE cam progaer 2ndindir tau=0.02, cam prescribe_aer 2ndindir tau=0.02

24 Sensitivity to size r=0.05 for oc, bc, volcanic

25 Conclusions The much larger indirect effect produced by CAM has not been completely explained. The much larger feedback of liquid water path explains at least part of larger indirect effect. The larger relative sensitivity of CCN to emissions in CAM may also contribute. The CAM CCN and IE are insensitive to the size distribution of OC and volcanic. A background aerosol reduces the IE from CAM, but cannot be justified.

26 Future Work Resolve differences between CAM and MIRAGE: insert monthly mean aerosol from each model into simulations by the other. Add detrainment of droplet number from cumulus. Integrate with UW turbulence and shallow cumulus schemes. Couple with MIRAGE treatment of aerosol dynamics and mixing state. Add nucleation scavenging and size-dependent impaction scavenging. Size and composition dependent optical properties. Add primary and secondary marine organic emissions.


Download ppt "Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM and MIRAGE Steve Ghan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Jean-Francois Lamarque, Peter Hess, and Francis Vitt, NCAR."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google