1. Data collection Cynthia Tavares Task Force meeting Luxembourg, 2- 3 March 2006

2. Data collection Data collection – background, coverage & methodology Response to Eurostat’s request Overview of the data received Quality issues & possibilities for improvement Future steps (publications etc.)

3. Background Task Force met in May/June 2005 to discuss the items to be collected –Annex 2 of the working paper for that meeting has a list of the agreed items European Director’s of Social Statistics met in September 2005 –Data to be collected from all EU Member States & EFTA countries on Crimes recorded by the police Number of police officers Prison population Survey data (from ICVS or national surveys – in the future) External company selected (by call for tender) to assist Eurostat in the data collection, analysis & dissemination

4. Crimes recorded Crimes recorded by the police –Total crime –Homicide – country & city –Violent crime –Robbery –Domestic burglary –Motor vehicle theft –Drugs trafficking

5. Methodology Member States, EFTA/EEA, EU acceding and candidate countries asked to nominate a contact point Eurostat wrote to contact points in November 2005 asking them to provide crime statistics for their country Response requested by January 2006 Information received - checked and edited by Eurostat Spreadsheets to be returned to countries for corrections & comments All processes will adhere to the European Statistics Code of Practice

6. Constructing Eurostat’s database Eurostat obtained existing international data from UK Home Office Eurostat’s contact points provided with tables for each offence – standard definition – opportunity for footnotes Data up to 2004 requested Reminder sent in January 21 Member States, 1 EFTA/EEA, 1 Acceding & 1 Candidate country have responded with data Information from various sources put together Excel file produced – see handoutExcel file

7. Information currently available Countries –All EU –EFTA/EEA (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland) –Acceding countries (Bulgaria, Romania) –Candidate countries (Turkey, Croatia, TFYR of Macedonia) –Potential candidate countries (Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Serbia & Montenegro) –Other countries (Australia, Canada, Japan, USA... & others) Time series –50 years data available for total crime –10 years data or more readily available for most offences –Footnotes indicate break in series due to changes in the law or statistical routines

8. Information to be held in Eurostat’s database Countries –All EU –EFTA/EEA (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland) –Acceding countries (Bulgaria, Romania) –Candidate countries (Turkey, Croatia, TFYR of Macedonia) –Potential candidate countries (Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Serbia & Montenegro) –Other countries (Australia, Canada, Japan, USA... & others) Time series –50 years data for total crime –10 years data for most offences –Footnotes

9. Checks performed Reliability checks –Basic arithmetical accuracy –Examination of unexplained fluctuations from year to year Cross-checks between different sources –Eurostat response –National websites –European Sourcebook –UK Home Office –Council of Europe –United Nations

10. Problems encountered Data –Attempting to put together data from different sources –Figures differ between published sources although definition appears similar –Large, unexplained variation in crime levels from year to year –Needs careful checking along with footnotes –Problems calculating figure for “violent crime” –Asked for data on “crimes recorded by the police” – sometimes gendarmerie figures not included Go to Notes

11. Contact points –Some Eurostat contact points have not yet provided data –No nominated contact points for others –Some contact points unable to help

12. Collection & checking continues Draft tables to be sent to –Eurostat nominated contact points –Suggest contact points work together with other experts to improve comparability Response requested by end April 2006 –Check the data –Fill in the gaps, send 2005 data if available –Check the footnotes carefully

13. Preparation of final tables Cross checking with other sources, as before Further contact with countries to resolve queries Figures for specific offences may be excluded if quality is too poor Tables returned to contact points for final checking

14. Publication of the data Information on Eurostat’s website –Public –Free of charge Currently considering the best way to do this –Important to manage all the meta data collected –Pre-set tables? –Self-designed tables? –Maps? Suggestions welcome

15. Eurostat’s website

16. Publication of summary tables Statistics in Focus –Fixed length – fixed format - 8 pages – but possible to have more than one edition Chart on “Statistics of the week” on the Website Website Suggestions - what could be included in these publications?

17. Proposed timetable for work Nov 2005 – Jan 2006: initial data request Feb 2006: checking data Mar 2006: 1st draft tables to contact points Mar – May 06: checking data June 06: 2nd draft tables to contact points Aug 06: preparation of “Statistics in Focus” Oct 06: Publication of data

18. Future studies To consider –How might comparability be improved? –Look at particular offences in detail? Which ones? Need your advice

19. Possible approach Using motor vehicle theft as an example –Make a table of the definition –Find out which statistics are collected by countries –Note the point of recording –See where countries converge in their definition –Propose a definition for the Eurostat collection Check other information sources

20. another possibility Homicide –Look in detail –Compare data from other sources – Interpol, UN, WHO Vast differences for some countries