Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Analyzing Redundancy in Bridge Deck Superstructures Using Finite Element Modeling By Whitney Hill Mentor: Dr. William McCarthy.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Analyzing Redundancy in Bridge Deck Superstructures Using Finite Element Modeling By Whitney Hill Mentor: Dr. William McCarthy."— Presentation transcript:

1 Analyzing Redundancy in Bridge Deck Superstructures Using Finite Element Modeling By Whitney Hill Mentor: Dr. William McCarthy

2 Preview  Introduction  Computer Methods  Methods  Results  Conclusions

3 Introduction  Redundancy in Bridges  Definition  Reasons for Redundancy  Diaphragms

4 Introduction  Purpose  Previous Research on Redundant Systems  Cost  Examples of Non- Redundant Systems  Mianus River Bridge  Hoan Bridge in Milwaukee, Wisconsin  Silver Bridge in Ohio Hoan Bridge Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Before and after failure

5 Finite Element Modeling Risa 2D Two Dimensional Computer Program Sap 2000 Three Dimensional Computer Program Computer Methods

6  Part 1: Models of the bridges are tested using Risa 2D  Part 2: The best representative model(s) are analyzed in Risa 2D  Part 3: A model similar to the best representative model found in Part 2 is done tested in Sap 2000 Project Parts

7 Methods Part 1  Working with Risa 2D  Horizontal Bracing  Cross Bracing  Loads  Reasons

8 Examples of Models M2

9 Examples of Models M2

10 Methods Part 2  Analysis  Testing  Results Output

11 Methods Part 3  Sap 2000

12 Results Member Forces  Horizontally Braced M2M2

13 Results Member Forces  Cross Braced M2M2

14 Results Joint Reactions  Horizontally Braced  Cross Braced

15 Results Member Forces Horizontally Braced Member Label Axial (kip) Shear (kip) Moment (kip*ft) M27.429-4.0690 7.429-4.0696.104 7.42-3.91112.015 7.42-3.91117.882 7.42-3.91123.75

16 Results Member Forces Cross Braced Member Label Axial (kip) Shear (kip) Moment (kip*ft) M25.01-1.251-0.002 5.01-1.2511.875 5.01-1.2513.751 5.01-1.2515.628 5.01-1.2517.504

17 Results Deflected Shape

18 Results  Deflected Shape

19 Conclusion  Horizontally versus Cross Braced  A horizontally braced frame has a more uniform load distribution than a cross braced frame.  Future Work  Continuing with Sap 2000

20 References Barker, Richard M. and Jay A. Puckett. Design of Highway Bridges. New York. Wiley- Interscience Publication. 1997. Summary of Hoan Bridge Failure Investigation and Retrofit. Lichtenstein Consulting Engineers. 04/05/07.http://www.lce.us/Hoan/summary.htm Daniel Webster Hoan Bridge. Lichtenstein Consulting Engineers. 04/05/07. http://www.lce.us/Hoan/

21 Questions? Or Comments?


Download ppt "Analyzing Redundancy in Bridge Deck Superstructures Using Finite Element Modeling By Whitney Hill Mentor: Dr. William McCarthy."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google