1. CMP Design Space Exploration Subject to Physical Constraints Yingmin Li, Benjamin Lee, David Brooks, Zhigang Hu, Kevin Skadron HPCA’06 01/27/2010

2. Issues Power and thermal issues are critical to architectural design Design space exploration under physical constraints –core count, pipeline depth, superscalar width, L2 cache, and voltage and frequency, under area and thermal constraints Prior work –exclusively on performance or on single-core

3. Contributions Various new observations for the CMP design given the physical constraints Experiment methodology which largely reduces the cost of design space exploration

4. Approach There are so many design parameters to optimize and co-optimize In this paper, several methods are used – Modeling and approximation Performance, power and area scaling Temperature – Decoupled core and interconnect/cache simulations. Simulation infrastructures are modular – Simpoint for representative simulation points

5. Approach Modeling –Formulas to model the power and performance scaling and area for pipeline width and depth –Temperature - at the granularity of core Decoupled Simulation –Use IBM’s Turnandot/PowerTimer to generate L2 cache-access traces – one time cost –Feed the traces to Zauber, a cache simulator. –Interpolation

6. n

7. Approaches DVFS Workloads –SPEC 2000 –CPU bound and memory bound Constraints –200 + LR+ MEMORY (Area + Thermal + CPU/Memory) Performance and power/performance efficiency

8. Results Without constraints CPU-bound benchmarks favor deeper pipelines Memory-bound benchmarks favor shallower pipelines

9. With Area Constraints To meet the area constraints, –Workloads Decrease the cache size for CPU-bound workloads Decrease the number of cores for memory-bound workloads – Pipeline dimensions Shifting to narrower widths provides greater area impact CPU-bound and memory-bound workloads have different, incompatible optima

10. Results Optimal Configurations with Varying Pipeline Width, Fixed Depth (18FO4)

11. Results Optimal Configurations with Varying Pipeline Depth, Fixed Width (4D)

12. With Thermal Constraints To meet the thermal constraints –Decrease the cache size for CPU-bound workloads –Decrease the number of cores for Memory- bound workloads

14. Thermal Constraints Thermal constraints exert great influence on the optimal design configurations Thermal constraints should be considered early in the design process

15. Conclusions Joint optimization across multiple design variables is necessary Thermal constraints appear to dominate other physical constraints and tend to favor shallower pipelines and narrower cores