1. Surfliner: Approaching Distortionless Light-Speed Wireline Communication Haikun Zhu, Rui Shi, C.-K. Cheng Dept. of CSE, U. C. San Diego Hongyu Chen Synopsys Inc. Masanori Hashimoto Jangsombatsiri Siriporn Osaka University

2. 2 Outline Motivation Previous Work Surfliner Overview Theory Implementation Simulation Results Applications Conclusions

3. 3 Outline Motivation Previous Work Surfliner Overview Theory Implementation Simulation Results Applications Conclusions

4. 4 Motivation ― On-chip Perspective On-chip global interconnect trend Abundant transistor computing resources and capability Wall of global interconnects - Delay, power, cost, reliability

5. 5 Motivation ― System Perspective Year200520102015 D ½ Pitch nm804525 Chip Size (mm 2 )310 Pin Count3,4004,0096,402 Cents/Pin1.781.371.05 On-chip (MHz)5,17012,000− Off-chip (MHz)3,125−29,103 Power Density (Watt/mm 2 )0.540.64− Off-chip frequency is expected to grow continuously Limited by inter-symbol interference, i.e., distortion Noise margin, jitter, BER, etc.

6. 6 Motivation ― I/O Perspective Year200520102015 D ½ Pitch nm804525 Chip Size (mm 2 )310 Pin Count3,4004,0096,402 Cents/Pin1.781.371.05 On-chip (MHz)5,17012,000− Off-chip (MHz)3,125−29,103 Power Density (Watt/mm 2 )0.540.64− Many designs nowadays are I/O limited I/Os are power hogs too; energy/bit grows exponentially Large # of pins makes pin breakaway harder Needs more packaging layers -> more cost Severe P/G integrity issues

7. 7 Outline Motivation Previous Work Surfliner Overview Theory Implementation Simulation Results Applications Conclusions

8. 8 Previous Work Existing on-chip serial link signaling schemes Pre-emphasis and equalization (W. Dally, ’98) Clocked discharging (M. Horowitz, ISVLSI ’03) Frequency modulation (S. Wong, JSSC ’03; Jose, ISVLSI ‘05) Non-linear transmission line (Hajimiri JSSC ’05, E. C. Kan CICC ’05) Resistive termination (M. Flynn, ICCAD ’05, CICC ‘05)

9. 9 Pre-emphasis A high-pass filter at the transmitter side to compensate the channel characteristic FIR Filter Transmitter Receiver Wireline channel Frequency Domain Time Domain Pictures courtesy of Johnny Zhang and Zhi Wang, “White paper on transmit pre-emphasis and receive equalization”

10. 10 Clocked Charge Recycling Essentially time-domain equalization directly implemented on the wire Ron Ho, M. Horowitz, ISVLSI ‘03

11. 11 Frequency Modulation Modulate the data to high-frequency (LC region) to achieve speed-of-light, low distortion transmission Richard T. Chang, Simon Wong, JSSC ‘03 Use RZ bit piece instead of NRZ, and reduce the duty cycle to push more frequency content to the higher spectrum (Jose et al., ISVLSI ’05)

12. 12 Resistive Termination Use resistive termination to cut the slow RC top Michael Flynn, ICCAD ‘05 Tsuchiya et al. developed an analytical model for eye opening with resistive termination (CICC ’05)

13. 13 Outline Motivation Previous Work Surfliner Overview Theory Implementation Simulation Results Applications Conclusions

14. 14 Surfliner ― Overview Single-ended case Typical on-chip Transmission Line Distortionless Transmission Line negligible leakage conductance Frequency dependent phase velocity (speed) and attenuation Intentionally make leakage conductance satisfy R/G=L/C Frequency response becomes flat from DC mode to Giga Hz

15. 15 Telegrapher’s Equations Telegrapher’s equations Propagation Constant Wave Propagation and corresponds to attenuation and phase velocity. Both are frequency dependent in general. Characteristic Impedance

16. 16 On-Chip Wires RC Region R = 2 Ω/μm (A=0.01 μm 2 ) L = 0.3 pH/μm, C = 0.2fF/μm R/L = 0.67E+12 Typical on-chip wire:

17. 17 LC Region If This is the premise of the frequency modulation approaches

18. 18 Surfliner ― Theory Distortionless transmission line If Both attenuation and phase velocity become frequency independent

19. 19 Surfliner ― Differential Case Common Mode – Current flowing in the same direction Differential Mode – Current flowing in the opposite direction Shunt between each line to groundShunt between the two lines

20. 20 Surfliner ― Implementation Evenly add shunt resistors between the signal line and the ground Non-ideality Ideal SurflinerIn PracticalImplication Homogeneous and distributive Discrete What’s the optimal spacing? Are the shunt resistors realizable? RLGC are frequency independent RLGC vary over frequency What’s the optimal frequency to do the matching?

21. 21 Surfliner ― Simulation On-chip single-ended stripline, 10 mm

22. 22 RLGC parameters RL GC Z0 = 54.7 Ω, speed = 65.87 ps/cm Match at DC Boost up low frequency traveling speed Balance low frequency attenuation and high frequency attenuation R 1MHz =135.4 Ω/cm, L 1MHz =5.34E-3 μH/cm, C 1MHz =1.217 pF/cm G=R 1MHz C 1MHz /L 1MH = 32.41 Ω/cm

23. 23 Shunt Resistor Spacing Assuming insert N shunt resistors Optimal spacing depends on the target data rate

24. 24 Pulse Response Flat top DC saturation voltage determined by the resistor ladder ISI effect greatly suppressed

25. 25 Eye Diagram Reduced amplitude Jitter < 2 ps Clear eye opening 1000 bit PRBS at 10Gbps Simulated in Hspice using W-element + tabular RLGC model

26. 26 A Frequency Domain Perspective More flat attenuation curve Boosted low-frequency Phase velocity

27. 27 Power Consumption Would static power consumption through shunt resistors kill Surfliner? Measured P avg Calculate E bit =P avg *T cycle Bit Rate (Gbps)5102040 P avg (mW)2.56242.57542.65442.7612 E bit (pJ)0.51250.25750.13270.0690

28. 28 Conclusions Demonstrated feasibility and superiority of Surfliner scheme Test chip fabrication (joint with Osaka) Waiting for testing results Furture work More applications: clock tree, etc. Model data-dependent jitter Incorporate transmitter/receiver design

29. 29 The End Thank you!