2. Stakeholder Relations at Large-Scale Infrastructures The CERN Model Rolf Heuer 7 th Canadian Science Policy Conference, Ottawa, 26 November 2015

3. 1949: The origins of CERN Louis de Broglie proposed: "the creation of a laboratory or institution where it would be possible to do scientific work, but somehow beyond the framework of the different participating states [Endowed with more resources than national facilities, such a laboratory could] undertake tasks, which, by virtue of their size and cost, were beyond the scope of individual countries”.

4. Funding for big science is the responsibility of countries

5. Stakeholders Funding agencies CERN scientists Neighbours Educational systems Students General publics Industry Media Employees Opinion leaders Scientific community Competitors

6. Methodology We provide the infrastructure

7. A user facility should be both host and participant to ensure excellence

8. Methodology The CERN Council

9. The CERN model brings all the funding agencies to the table to agree on a plan and oversee its execution

10. Methodology Passing the baton…

11. A rolling five year plan avoids fiscal cliffs and aids seamless financial management

12. Member State contributions 2015 Country% contribution Austria2.21 Belgium2.76 Bulgaria0.29 Czech Republic1.00 Denmark1.77 Finland1.38 France15.13 Germany20.47 Greece1.45 Hungary0.62 Country% contribution Israel1.34 Italy11.06 Netherlands4.55 Norway2.80 Poland2.75 Portugal1.15 Slovak Republic0.50 Spain7.82 Sweden2.82 Switzerland3.87 United Kingdom14.26 (Does not include candidate and Associate Members)

13. A culture of mutual help

14. Forming the LHC collaborations

15. The LHC experiments

16. The European Strategy for Particle Physics

17. Diversity

18. Collaborative competition

19. The blend of collaboration and competition is vital to the success of the scientific endeavour

20. Research in Canada

21. Could Canada create a “CERN Council” of the Provinces?

22. The three Cs Consensus Collaboration Competition

23. Key points Funding for big science is the responsibility of countries A user facility should be both host and participant to ensure excellence The CERN model brings all the funding agencies to the table to agree on a plan and oversee its execution A rolling five year plan avoids fiscal cliffs and aids seamless financial management The blend of collaboration and competition is vital to the success of the scientific endeavour Could Canada create a “CERN Council” of the Provinces?