1. Picture change during blinks: looking without seeing and seeing without looking Professor: Liu Student: Ruby

2. Purpose & Motive Purpose: –Changing Central or Marginal Interest aspects, the observer controlling the degree of attention that subjects would be expected to pay to the changes. Motive: –An additional point that will be addressed in this paper concerns the question of eye position, which recent studies did not mention.

3. References YearAuthorsResults 1996 1991 Grimes McConkie Large changes in a visual scene can go undetected if the changes coincide temporally with the moment an eye saccade occurs. 1996 1999 Rensink, O ’ Regan, and Clark The effect can also be obtained without saccades if a large visual transient such as a screen flicker. 1997cf. Sun et al. Blinks occur at a relatively high rate (20 – 30 times per minute), which requires continual monitoring of visual conditions, it would be important to know: 1. What extent a change in a traffic light. 2. Brake light, or a dangerous road event, may be missed if it occurs during a blink.

4. Method - Materials 48 digitized color images There were three kinds of changes: –Appearance or disappearance of a picture element. –A shift in the position of an object. –A change in the color of an object, surface or region. In half of the pictures the locations of the picture that were changed to be Central Interest (CI), and half were Marginal Interest (MI).

5. Method - Procedure The subjects sat with their eyes at a distance of 80 cm from a color video monitor in a darkened room. 10 practice pictures. To press a button immediately when the subjects occurred. Subjects were asked to look at the location where they had seen the change.

6. Method - Procedure If after 48 seconds or 15 blinks the change had not yet been detected, the computer waited for 0.5 and 1 sec, and displayed the change without waiting for a blink. After the experiment the experimenter interviewed the subjects to decide they had detected a correlation with blinks. –2 said they had noticed some kind of correlation.

7. Method – Subject Subjects: –Ten subjects. –The subjects were studying at the Ludwig Maximilians Universität.

8. Results – Number of blinks before detection

9. Analysis of the eye movement trace let understand why changes are so hard to detect and what is the origin of the difference between the Central and Marginal Interest cases.

10. Results – Eye movement measures

11. MI locations, being less “interesting” to observers, which tend to be less likely to be included in the scan than CI locations.

12. Results – Eye movement measures

14. CI locations receive more direct fixations than the MI locations because CI locations were chosen to be more interesting or relevant for interpretation of the picture than MI locations. At the moment of a blink, the eye’s location tended to be closer to the change location when it was a CI location than when it was a MI location.

15. Results – Looking without seeing Figure5b shows the eye’s location on the “effective” blinks. Figure5c shows a blink Will give rise to a change detection, as a function of the eye’s distance to the change location.

16. Results – Looking without seeing More than 40% of the cases, when the eye is directly fixating the change at the moment it occurs, the change goes undetected. –Do not always see where you look. For an eccentricity of between 2 and 10 degrees, change detection is almost constant at a value of about 0.1. – “seeing without looking”.

17. Results – Looking without seeing At a given distance between the eye and the change location, CI changes are slightly more likely to be detected than MI changes. An MI change will overall be less likely to be detected than a CI change because it is not what the observer considers the picture to be about.

18. Other results on looking without seeing Intentional blindness was surprisingly strong at the very location where the eyes were looking. In scenes consisting of small collections of objects, changes made to directly attended objects can be missed.

19. Other results on looking without seeing Real-life situations where the person to whom a subject is talking can be replaced during a brief interruption in the conversation without the subject noticing. There is no need to “re”-present the outside world inside the brain, since the outside world can be used as an external memory to be probed when details need to be obtained.

20. Discussion Detecting Changes Under Normal Conditions. –Further work would be useful to determine to what extent people miss MI changes that take place in full view under normal conditions. Detecting Changes with Concomitant Visual Disturbances. –Marginal Interest changes are hard to detect. –The changing picture item occurs in full view and is not at all masked by a global disturbance of any sort.

21. Discussion The Moment of Change and Very Slow Changes. –If conditions are arranged so that changes occur so slowly that they do not cheat visual transients at all. –Under situations where changes are so slow and no transient detector signals the location of the change, we should make large changes in MI locations in full view of observers without these being noticed.

22. Conclusion Eye movements in the failure to detect changes. –The eye is directly fixating the change location, an appreciable proportion (more than 40%) of changes are still not detected. The exact nature of MI changes occurring in full view should be difficult for observers to specify, even though they are aware that a change has occurred.

23. Conclusion At a given moment, a scene aspect may constitute only a sub-set of the elements that are currently being directly fixated, namely a particular sub-set that, when grouped together, corresponds to some meaningful scene thing.