Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Measure H Update CITIZEN’S BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (CBOC) JANUARY 11, 2016.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Measure H Update CITIZEN’S BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (CBOC) JANUARY 11, 2016."— Presentation transcript:

1 Measure H Update CITIZEN’S BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (CBOC) JANUARY 11, 2016

2 Presentations  PDA Day (August 2015, February 2016)  2030 Plan Steering Committee (Monthly from July 2015 through January 2016, ongoing)  Department Chair Committee & Instructional Managers (SVP Mary Kay Rudolph)  Petaluma Administrators (VP Jane Saldana-Talley)  Faculty Senate (Senate President Robin Fautley)  Classified Senate (Senate President Kathy Matthies)  Student Services Council (VP Ricardo Navarette)  Governing Board  Foundation Board

3 Site and Building Walks  Santa Rosa Campus  Analy  Baker  Burbank  Call Child Development Center  Lark  Lounibos  Pioneer  Petaluma Campus  Shone Farm  Southwest Center  Public Safety Training Center

4 Start-Up Initiatives State Capital Outlay Process:  Resubmittal of Final Project Plan (FPP) for the Science Project. $27.2M potential funding Basecamp:  For internal distribution of information for the Steering Committee and subcommittees Measure H Website Construction:  General Information about Measure H  Vendor Information (RFPs, Sample Contracts, Forms)  Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee  Presentations and Briefings  Planning Documents

5 Sonoma County Junior College District From North to South: Public Safety Training Center (Windsor), Santa Rosa Junior College Campus (Santa Rosa), Southwest Center (Roseland), Santa Rosa), Shone Farm (Healdsburg), Petaluma Campus (Petaluma)

6 Facilities Master Planning Selection Committee  One Board of Trustee Member – Jordan Burns (2 nd interview, Rick Call)  One Student – Lauren Kershner  Two Faculty Members – Lenny Wagner and Joe Fassler  Two Classified Staff – Mike Garcia & Adrienne Leihy  Two Management Staff – Dr. Jane Saldana-Talley & Ricardo Navarrette (2 nd interview, Josh Adams)  This shared governance model will be utilized in architectural selections moving forward.

7 Selection of Gensler/QKA team as the Facilities Master Planner The Master Planning Team will provide the following services: 1. Building Assessments: Review and supplement existing building assessment data 2. Demographic Trends & Current Space Utilization – review & incorporate existing documentation:  Strategic plan  Educational master plan  Student support plan  Technology plan  5 year State Capital Outlay plan 3. Master Planning Services – architectural & landscape planning based on the educational plan 4. Districtwide Standards – create standards for the District *The Facilities Master Planner will not design individual projects and buildings

8 1. Facilities Condition Assessment The Master Planner (a team of architects and engineers) will review building and infrastructure systems, including:  Utilities (underground and above ground)  Structural  Mechanical  Electrical  Roofing  Building Envelope  Goal is to coordinate replacement and repair of buildings with a maintenance schedule

9 Current Space Utilization and Demographic Trends 2. Current Space Utilization and Demographic Trends ◦Consider existing space; determine whether size and amenities fit program growth ◦Identify growth areas and validate existing programs (size and location) ◦Existing programs can form the baseline for improvement ◦Demographic trends in District service area ◦How do these inputs encourage FTES growth or fit the State funding (IPP/FPP) requirements? Desired Outcome ◦Identify service areas and/or programs that require facilities upgrades Heritage Buildings may require work “behind” the skin

10 2. County Demographics & Space Utilization Are there trends within the County that anticipate growth in a particular area? Is a program growing at a teaching site?  Identify growing academic programs and opportunities  Will a program benefit from a facility enhancement?  Understand current space utilization  Take advantage of State funding, if available  Goal is to leverage local funds with State funds

11 EXAMPLE OF A SPACE CAPACITY SUMMARY (above): The SRJC snapshot shows (projected to completion of Science in 2021): Lecture – 119.0% CAP load ratio (slightly high) Lab – 75.2% CAP load ratio (lab space available) Office – 148.3% CAP load ratio * This suggests funding available for Labs, if strategically presented

12 3. Facilities Master Plans (Architecture and Landscape) Facilities Master Plans:  Long Term Comprehensive Vision for all teaching sites  Include landscape opportunities  Analysis should include all properties owned by District  Identify land acquisition opportunities if needed.  Goal: Comprehensive vision mapped to Measure H goals

13 EXAMPLE: ANALYSIS SITE CONDITIONS Pedestrian Access and View Corridors Landscape Opportunities Gateways and Vehicular Access Clarity of Circulation

14 EXAMPLE: ANALYSIS OF CAMPUS ORGANIZATION Organizing Spines Organizing Nodes Campus Core – Quads and Courtyards

15 EXAMPLE: QUADS AND OPEN SPACE Formal Gathering and Geometry Informal Space supporting events Seating and Shade

16 Design Standards Design Standards can include:  Building materials and equipment: style guide, colors, quality level  Landscape elements: plantings, site furniture, materials  Sustainability standards: energy, water, transportation  Signage and wayfinding: interior and exterior signage on campus  Fixtures, Fittings and Equipment: including new teaching methodologies  IT: infrastructure and instructional  Universal access design and ADA transition plan  Goal is to create a set of standards for project specific architects to utilize and to simplify maintenance and operations of the institution

17 EXAMPLE OF A COLOR AND MATERIAL PALETTE

18 EXAMPLE OF LANDSCAPE AND TREE GUIDELINE

19 EXAMPLE OF LANDSCAPE SITE FURNITURE DESIGN GUIDELINE

20 EXAMPLE OF SUSTAINABILITY A GUIDELINE – VISION AND GOALS

21 EXAMPLE OF A SIGNAGE AND WAYFINDING “FAMILY”

22 EXAMPLE OF AN ACCESSIBILITY REPORT

23 Connecting the Educational Plan to the Facilities Master Plan The Facilities Master Plan should follow the Educational Master Plan. The Educational Plan should help determine:  Which programs are growing and contracting?  Which programs should be located at each site?  What is the right size for each teaching site?  Where is growth in the County?  What are the demographic trends?  What industries need training?

24

25 Educational Planning Facilities Planning

26 The Bridge: County & Demographic Data Educ. Prog. Information Other Considerations Early 2016 Bridging the EMP to the FMP Strategic Plan 2014 Master Plans: Educational Student Services Technology 2014 Other Considerations: State Funding (5 Year Capital Outlay Plan) Measure A Project List Building Assessments Community Investment and Outreach January to June 2016 Results: Facilities Master Plan District Standards Spring 2016 Spending & Implementation Plan Summer/Fall 2016

27 The Bridge: County & Demographic Data Educ. Prog. Information Other Considerations Early 2016 Bridging the EMP to the FMP Strategic Plan 2014 Master Plans: Educational Student Services Technology 2014 Other Considerations: State Funding (5 Year Capital Outlay Plan) Measure A Project List Building Assessments Community Investment and Outreach January to June 2016 Results: Facilities Master Plan District Standards Spring 2016 Spending & Implementation Plan Summer/Fall 2016 Today

28 Preliminary Planning Schedule: Today Start Finish 2015 2016 2017 2018 DRAFT – FACILITIES PLAN DEVELOPEMENT SCHEDULE

29 Preliminary Planning Schedule: Today StartFinish DRAFT – FIRST PROJECT OPPORTUNITY (OPEN IN 2018) 2015 2016 2017 2018

30 Measure H Update (Assessments) Facilities Master Planning Assessment ◦DW waterproofing assessment meetings: QKA & Facilities ◦DW MEP (Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing) assessment: QKA and Facilities ◦DW comprehensive on-site review beginning January 4: QKA and Facilities ◦Site level Civil Surveys: Gensler and Bruelje-Race Internal Data Assessment ◦Fusion Database confirmation and update: Eric Mittlestead ◦Functional space inventory “on the ground” confirmation: FPPS and Facilities ◦Below ground infrastructure mapping: Landmark Systems/CSW and Facilities

31 Measure H Update (Steering Committee) 2030 Plan Steering Committee Committee Surveys complete: +/- 200 responses for 8 committees Gensler Team presentation: Site analysis of each teaching site (ongoing) Sustainability Workshop: January 29 Selection of first Measure H project Committee Opportunities Fixtures Fittings and Equipment (FFE) Signage, Wayfinding and Graphics Universal Access and Accessibility (ADA+) Sustainability Health and Safety Demonstration Classroom and Instructional Technology Landscape Architectural

32 Measure H Update (Project Delivery Methods) First Measure H project – Burbank Theater 70+ year old heritage building on Measure A list Functionality and comfort challenges through out interior Community visibility and support Potential for additional fundraising Manageable logistics (swing space, clear program) Project Delivery Methods Design-Bid-Build: Lowest cost with schedule and quality risk Lease-Lease-Back: Davis Case in Fresno has raised concerns in GC community CM at Risk: No longer allowed CM Multi-Prime: Professional service procurement for CM, owner holds schedule and contract risk Design-Build: Schedule and quality risk is reduced, payment of stipend to unsuccessful DBE teams is recommended

33 Measure H Update (Burbank Theater) Burbank Theater Project Delivery Method: Design-Build Design Architect and Theater Consultant prepare “Bridging Documents” General Contractor and Architect of Record are on the same team (DBE) DBE is selected by “best value” – a stipulated sum with “enhancements” DBE is responsible for final documentation, DSA approval and construction Higher quality and faster project delivery Minimum project size is $2.5M Familiar delivery method in the CA Community College system

34 Measure H Update (Burbank Theater) Burbank Theater Issues, Challenges and Opportunities Project Labor Agreement Heritage Building and structural assessment findings California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Project Budget Development and scope agreements Fundraising Opportunities Community Impact and Support Restore and revitalize one of the oldest buildings on the SR campus

35 Measure H Update Questions?


Download ppt "Measure H Update CITIZEN’S BOND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (CBOC) JANUARY 11, 2016."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google