Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Title I-A Coordinators Conversation December 15, 2015.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Title I-A Coordinators Conversation December 15, 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 Title I-A Coordinators Conversation December 15, 2015

2 Agenda  Introductions & ODE Updates  ESEA Reauthorization Highlights  Every Student Succeeds Act Timelines  Topics  Topics from Coordinators

3 Introductions (Who’s online & in the room?)

4 Updates & Changes at ODE  Saying Goodbye to  Paula Radich, Assistant Superintendent  & Please Welcome  Lisa Plumb, Education Specialist (Joined the Title IA team in August)  Dawne Huckaby, Assistant Superintendent (from Roseburg Public Schools)

5 The purpose of today’s presentation is to provide highlights of the new law. Details will be forthcoming in the months ahead.

6 Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Signed into law on December 10, 2015 introducing

7 Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Bill introduced by Alexander & Murray 4/2015 Approved by House 359-64 on 12/2/2015 Approved by Senate 85-12 on 12/9/2015 Signed into law by President on 12/10/201 5

8 Major ESSA Timelines  ESEA Waivers terminate August 1, 2016  But continue to support Focus/Priority schools in 2016-17 SY  SB290 (educator evaluations) remain in effect  New accountability requirements take effect in 2017-2018 SY  Grant Programs  Implementation of noncompetitive formula grants effective July 1, 2016  Competitive grants effective October 1, 2016  Federal Rulemaking  Dec 2015-May 2016 regulations drafted and reviewed by White House, Congress, other agencies  May 2016 public input on draft rules (60 days)  July–Oct 2016 USED reviews comments and drafts final regulations  October 26, 2016 final publication of new regulations

9 Oregon’s Rollout Timeline ODE will communicate transition plans in January ODE establish stakeholder work groups in January-February Convene stakeholder workgroups February-June to begin developing Oregon’s State Plan 2015-16 School Year Transition year to develop policy, guidance, OARs based on final regulations from USED Finalize State Plan and submit to USED for approval 2016-17 School Year Implementation of accountability system identified in State Plan 2017-18 School Year

10 Issues to address to prepare for the 2016-17 transition school year Under the waiver, ODE is set to identify new schools for support in 2016-17; at this time ODE is waiting for guidance from USED P/F schools that fail to meet current exit criteria will continue to be supported in 2016-17 Focus and Priority Schools Federal requirements for educator evaluations are eliminated in ESSA and waiver requirements are null in void August 2016; HOWEVER, we have state law (SB 290) and OARs that remain. Educator Evaluation

11 This information will continue to be updated by ODE as new details becomes available.

12 Title IA – Standards & Assessments  Academic Standards  States adopt “challenging” academic standards in reading, math, and science aligned with higher ed and CTE institutions  Assessments  Test reading and math in grades 3-8 and once in high school; science once in elementary, middle, and high  Disaggregate data by subgroup  For high school, districts could use local, nationally recognized tests, such as SAT or ACT (in lieu of)  1% cap for alternative assessments for cognitive disabilities  95% participation by all students and subgroups is required but state creates its own “opt-out” policy and decides how to include in accountability system

13 Title IA - Accountability  State-defined system replaces AYP  State sets long term and interim goals: academic achievement, graduation rates, English language proficiency  Indicators to be incorporated into acct system:  Academic proficiency  State tests  English Language proficiency  High schools must include grad rates  Other measures of School Quality or Student Success (e.g. student engagement, access to advanced coursework, school climate…)

14 Title I-A Accountability cont.  Also requires 95% participation on state assessments to be factored into accountability, but how is up to states  Weighting the Indicators  States decide how much the individual indicator will count, though academic factors would have to count “much” more as a group than the “other” indicators  (USED to define “much”)

15 Title I – School Improvement  At least once every 3 years, states must identify and intervene in bottom 5% of lowest performing schools, and high schools where grad rate <67%  District develops Comprehensive Support and Improvement plan approved and monitored by state  State sets exit criteria and determines action if not met  States must annually notify districts when one or more subgroups of students are consistently underperforming  Schools implement Targeted Support and Improvement plans, approved and monitored by district

16 Title I – School Improvement cont.  School Improvement Grants (SIG) eliminated  Current 4% set-aside for school improvement increased to 7%  95% to local districts to fund “SIG-like” evidence-based activities to help districts meet the needs of students in poverty  States may reserve up to 3% for Direct Student Services such as credit recovery, Advanced Placement (AP), tutoring, transportation for public school choice

17 State Report Cards  Current structure of State and local report cards remain  Reporting includes:  Description of accountability system (goals, indicators, weights)  Disaggregation on student achievement, all students and subgroups  Assessments and graduation rates for foster and homeless students  Professional qualifications of teachers; eliminates HQT reporting

18 Teacher Quality and Evaluation  Ends “Highly Qualified Teachers” (HQT);  However, districts must still report on experience, credentials, and teaching out-of-field; data disaggregated and by high/low poverty in Report Card  Ends federal mandate on educator evaluations;  However, state law (SB290) and Oregon Administrative rule remains  Build on existing system; stakeholder conversations

19 Title II  State grant formula ensures states receive funding that is reflective of their student poverty population  States may reserve up to 3% for subgrants to district to support principals and other school leaders  Establishes national initiatives:  Teacher and School Leader Incentives  Literacy Education for All, Results for the Nation  American History and Civics Education  Programs of National Significance  Supporting effective educator development  Recruiting school leaders  STEM master teacher corp.

20 Title IV  Authorizes Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants  95% allocation districts  District does a needs assessment; fund in each category:  Well-Rounded Educational Opportunities (e.g. AP & IB test fees, STEM, arts, computer science)  Safe and Health Students  Effective Use of Technology  Continues 21 st Century Community Learning Centers as stand- alone program  Authorizes Family Engagement Centers  Authorizes reservations for National Activities  Education innovation & research; community support for school success, school safety, academic enrichment

21 Other Provisions  Reauthorizes  Title III, English Language Learners grant program  Magnet Schools program  Indian Education  Impact Aid  Homeless Education of the McKinney-Vento Act  Preschool Development Grants funded through the Department of Health and Human Services and jointly administered by the Secretary of Education.  Reauthorization period FY2017 thorough FY2020

22 Input from the field Workgroups identified – January 2016 Workgroups convene – February–June 2016 Ongoing public input Stakeholder Workgroups Meetings will begin in February 2016 Title IA Committee of Practitioners

23 ESSA Resources & Links ODE’s Summary of ESEA Reauthorization framework http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=347 5http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=347 5 Oregon Dept of Education Please note that it is 391 pages Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA bill http://www.ed.gov/ESSA US Dept of Education Article by Alyson Klein ESEA Reauthorization: ESSA Explained Education Week

24 Please send ESSA questions to the ODE Federal System Team PowerPoint & Webinar will be posted at http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id =1939 http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id =1939

25 Send Questions Theresa Richards (theresa.richards@state.or.us)theresa.richards@state.or.us Russ Sweet (russ.sweet@state.or.us)russ.sweet@state.or.us Melinda Bessner (melinda.bessner@state.or.us)melinda.bessner@state.or.us Lisa Plumb (lisa.plumb@state.or.us)lisa.plumb@state.or.us

26 Federal Systems Team  Director  Theresa Richards  Education Specialists  Melinda Bessner, Title I-A, Monitoring, REAP, RLIS, Schoolwide Planning, Budget Narrative Approvals for districts E-P  Dona Bolt, Title X (Homeless Education)  Lisa Plumb, Title I-A, Monitoring, Budget Narrative Approvals for districts A-D  Pete Ready, 21 st Century Community Learning Centers  Russ Sweet, Monitoring, Titles I-A & I-D, Private Schools, Budget Narrative Approvals for districts Q-Z  Support Staff  Emily Swope  Stacie Ankrum  Ann Kaltenbach

27 Outside of ESSA Topics from Coordinators?


Download ppt "Title I-A Coordinators Conversation December 15, 2015."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google