Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Radiative Influences on Glaciation Time-Scales in Mixed-Phase Clouds Zachary Lebo, Nathanial Johnson, and Jerry Harrington Penn State University Acknowledgements:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Radiative Influences on Glaciation Time-Scales in Mixed-Phase Clouds Zachary Lebo, Nathanial Johnson, and Jerry Harrington Penn State University Acknowledgements:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Radiative Influences on Glaciation Time-Scales in Mixed-Phase Clouds Zachary Lebo, Nathanial Johnson, and Jerry Harrington Penn State University Acknowledgements: DOE-ARM and Dennis Lamb for many useful discussions.

2 Cloud tops can maintain narrow liquid layers if ice crystals remain small and updrafts are sufficiently strong (Rauber and Tokay, 1991) It is possible to maintain a mix of liquid and ice during ascent (Tremblay et al., 1996) Liquid topped arctic clouds that precipitate ice are possible if ice nuclei concentrations are small (Pinto, 1998, Harrington et al., 1999) and if ice nuclei are removed through sedimentation (Harrington and Olsson, 2001, Morrison et al., 2005). Why Can Liquid and Ice Persist in Mixed-Phase Clouds? Previous work has shown:

3 Glaciation Time-Scales Hence, time-scale for complete glaciation of mixed-phase clouds is important and depends on (at least): –Ice concentration and updraft velocity Since radiation affects the growth of drops, is there a similar influence on the Bergeron process? From Korolev and Isaac (2003) 1.6 min 16 min 160 min ~ 2.6 hrs

4 Radiatively Modified Ice Growth Method is that of Korolev and Isaac (2003) but add the radiative term for the growth of ice: Radiative Effect = E d Start with a simple box model –Integrate above equation numerically until a fixed amount of cloud liquid water content (LWC) is depleted.

5 Computing Radiative Influence Use simple, static adiabatic model of stratiform arctic cloud. Solar (SW) and infrared (LW) radiative heating computed via two-stream model (Harrington and Olsson, 2001)

6 Radiative Heating/Cooling of Crystals E d easily computed at each vertical level within the idealized cloud. LW Cooling: Increases rapidly while SW Heating increases more slowly with size. Net Effect: LW dominates at small sizes with cross-over to net heating at large sizes E d At Cloud Top Plate Crystals

7 Radiative Influences on Ice Supersaturation Cloud Top: Radiative cooling dominates, s ui increases to over 30% from ~ 15% Mid Cloud: SW heating dominates decreasing s ui to less than 15%. –When SW Heating becomes large enough  Crystals will actually sublimate Crystal Growth Crystal Sublimation Plate Crystals N i = 1 L -1 T top = -15 C  0 = 45 0

8 Radiative Influence on Glaciation Time-Scale No Radiation: Results similar to Korolev and Issac. LW Cooling: Drastic decrease in glaciation time –Positive feedback: Larger crystals, more cooling, etc. SW Heating: Reduces LW effect at cloud top. Initial LWC: 0.1 g m -3 Ni = 1 L -1 Plate Crystals

9 Radiative Influence on Glaciation Time-Scale LW Cooling drops off rapidly. –100 m below cloud top glaciation time-scales not at strongly impacted. Mid-Cloud: Since SW heating dominates, glaciation does not occur. –Crystals grow to radiatively limited sizes. Initial LWC: 0.1 g m -3 Ni = 1 L -1 Plate Crystals

10 Glaciation Time-Scale: Fixed Rates Crystals grow too large in box model –Fix ice growth rates at a particular size Small crystals, glaciation time is long  radiative influences don’t matter Larger crystals, glaciation times shorter (< 100min) so radiative influences quite important. No Radiation

11 Concluding Remarks Simple box model calculations suggest that radiative heating and cooling may substantially influence glaciation times. –LW cooling at cloud top may enhance crystal growth –SW heating (even when weak) may substantially increase mixed-phase cloud lifetimes (as long as   > 75 0 ) Computations with bin microphysical model tend to corroborate these results. Next plan to incorporate into parcel models, and LES, to test radiative influences on more realistically simulated clouds.

12 Stratiform Arctic Mixed-Phase Persistence In the Arctic: Mixed- phase clouds occur throughout the year. Ice nuclei  ice concentration (& size) Important for mixed-phase longevity (Pinto, 1998; Harrington et al., 1999; Morrison et al., 2005). LES-Derived Water Paths M-PACE Observations

13 Radiative Influence on Glaciation Time-Scale LW Cooling and SW Heating using spheres: Results similar to those for plates. Spheres Initial LWC: 0.1 g m -3 Ni = 1 L -1 Cloud Top


Download ppt "Radiative Influences on Glaciation Time-Scales in Mixed-Phase Clouds Zachary Lebo, Nathanial Johnson, and Jerry Harrington Penn State University Acknowledgements:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google