Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

LUNaR SECON I Senior Design I Midterm Presentation October 4, 2007.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "LUNaR SECON I Senior Design I Midterm Presentation October 4, 2007."— Presentation transcript:

1 LUNaR SECON I Senior Design I Midterm Presentation October 4, 2007

2 Team 1 Dr. Bryan Jones, Advisor Ted Copeland Bryan Reese Theresa Weisenberger Jeffrey Lorens Block DetectionXX Path DetectionXX Object AvoidanceXX CommunicationXX

3 Outline Competition Overview LUNaR Project Breakdown Technical Constraints Practical Constraints Summary

4 Competition: Summary Lunar mineral harvesting robot Color-coded blocks with RFID tags Collect maximum of four blocks and bring them back to home base Final rounds head-to- head

5 Competition: Court Home Bases Red/Blue/White Blocks X Black Blocks Pea Gravel Sand Paint 6 ft Symmetrical Block Placement IR Beacons (2.5kHz and 4 kHz) on Home Bases Note: Grid will not be on the field during competition X

6 Outline Competition Overview LUNaR Project Breakdown Technical Constraints Practical Constraints Summary

7 Project Management PathDetermination ObjectAvoidance BlockDetection BlockRetrieval BaseDetection Locomotion ReturnHome Team 1 Team 2

8 Team 1 Block Detection Color Detection Location Path Planning Shortest route Communicate Environmental sensing

9 Team 1 Object Avoidance Blocks Other robot Home Base Detection IR LEDs Correct Frequency

10 Outline Competition Overview LUNaR Project Breakdown Technical Constraints Practical Constraints Summary

11 Technical Constraints NameDescription Block Detection The robot must be able to detect and distinguish among red, blue, black, and white blocks. Path Planning The robot must find a path to a target block while avoiding any obstacles.

12 Block Detection Reasons for block detection and color differentiation Prioritize block pick up Minimize the time spent collecting blocks Approaches Blind Grid Search Range Finder Search Vision Processing Laser Range Finder

13 Blind Grid Search +Simplest approach +Must pick up all blocks –Cannot determine a block’s color –Blocks moved from their initial location will not be found

14 IR Range Finder Search +Little processing required +Not confused by colored floor –Cannot determine a block’s color –Small field of view RF

15 Vision Processing +Can determine a block’s color +Block retrieval can be prioritized +Wide field of view –Can be confused by the colored floor and changes in lighting –Lots of processing required

16 Laser Range Finder +Can determine a block’s color +Block retrieval can be prioritized +Wide field of view +No color confusion +Less complicated processing –Laser must be turned off and on [1]

17 Laser Range Finder Laser Beam on Blocks The laser point on a block

18 Environmental Sensing Calculating distance to walls Four IR rangefinders One on each side of the robot Placed at least 3” above the ground Calculate position on court by triangulation RF 3” RF

19 Distance Measurement The SHARP GP2Y0A02YK0F Emits IR beam with an IRED Dimensions: 1.16×0.5×0.85 in Range: ~ 8 – 60 in Output: Analog and digital models available [2]

20 Outputs a high or low voltage depending on the distance of the detected object. Targets do not have set distances –Would make rangefinding more difficult IR: Digital versus Analog Digital

21 IR: Digital versus Analog +Outputs a voltage that is proportional to the distance of the detected object. +Allows specific distance calculation Best option for this application Analog

22 Outline Competition Overview LUNaR Project Breakdown Technical Constraints Practical Constraints Summary

23 Practical Constraints TypeNameDescription SustainabilityDependability The robot must be sturdy enough to withstand repeated use. ManufacturabilityModularity The robot must be designed as a set of subsystems that can be replaced independent of other subsystems.

24 Sustainability Robot must be able to run full round (6 min) without repair. Rugged enough to sustain normal wear. Only minor maintenance (i.e. battery changing) between rounds

25 Manufacturability 10” x 10” x 11” size constraint [3] Built in a modular fashion Easy replacement of a failed subsystem Most accessible: battery packs

26 Outline Competition Overview LUNaR Project Breakdown Technical Constraints Practical Constraints Summary

27 Timeline SepOctNovDec Block Detection Path Planning Home base detection Integration Test/Debug Aug

28 Summary AspectMethod Block DetectionLaser Rangefinder Block RetrievalColor-sensing Camera Path Planning Block Detection + Environmental Sensing Practical Constraints Sustainability Modularity

29 References [1] Maxon, K. “A Real-time Laser Range Finding Vision System,” Encoder. 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200110/vision.htm http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200110/vision.htm [2] SHARP. “SHARP GP2Y0A02YK0F.” SHARP Corporation, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://document.sharpsma.com/files/gp2y0a02yk_e.pdf http://document.sharpsma.com/files/gp2y0a02yk_e.pdf [3] Huntsville IEEE Section. "SoutheastCon 2008 Hardware Competition Rules: Return to the Moon," IEEE SoutheastCon 2008. 2007. Available: http://ewh.ieee.org/reg/3/secon/08/competition.html http://ewh.ieee.org/reg/3/secon/08/competition.html Questions?


Download ppt "LUNaR SECON I Senior Design I Midterm Presentation October 4, 2007."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google