1. UCSD’s Distributed Science DMZ
Thomas Hutton Chief Network Architect San Diego Supercomputer Center
Co-PI NSF CCNIE Award “Cherub”

2. Typical HPC “Science DMZ”

3. Prism@UCSD, Phil Papadopoulos, SDSC, Calit2, PI
NSF CC-NIE Funded and CHERuB A Distributed Campus Science DMZ
CHERuB
Phil Papadopoulos, SDSC, Calit2, PI
CHERuB, Mike Norman, SDSC PI; Tom Hutton, SDSC CoPI; Valerie Polichar, UCSD CoPI

4. Prism@UCSD and CHeruB A Distributed Campus Science DMZ
Funded by NSF awards: , CNS , CNS , CNS , ACI , and ACI

5. Pacific Research Platform v1.0: A Regional Science DMZ
PRP v1 Single Layer 2 vlan (963) reaching into all locations.

6. Over $9M in CC-NIE Campus Awards
Pacific Research Platform (PRP) v1.0 – Large Layer2 Vlan (963) with limited BGP Peering
NSF Has Invested
Over $9M in CC-NIE Campus Awards

7. PRPv2.0 – Option A - Single Vlan – Full Mesh Peering
Pros:
Allows each endpoint to control their policy
Cons:
Single L2 vlan throughout PRP
Requires new BGP setup each time a site is added.

8. PRPv2. 0 Option B – XSEDE Approach – Full Mesh Vlans
PRPv2.0 Option B – XSEDE Approach – Full Mesh Vlans? (due to multipoint vlan AL2S issues…)
Pros:
Allows each endpoint to control their policy
Cons:
Requires new BGP setup each time a site is added.
Requires new vlans for each site
Heavy configuration in each network. Good canidate for SDN ‘circuits’.

9. PRPv2.0 Option C – shared vlan – Cenic attached Router Server/Reflector
Advantages:
Common Route Policy
Easy Setup to add new site.
Disadvantages:
How do PRP and Cenic HPR evolve into PRP 2?
Route
Server
Route
Server

11. Pacific Research Platform (PRP) v0 – Single Layer2 Vlan
NSF Has Invested
Over $9M in CC-NIE Campus Awards