1. 32 T All-Superconducting Magnet W. Denis Markiewicz User Committee Meeting National High Magnetic Field Laboratory October 1-3, 2009

2. Contents Overview Magnet Parameters Schedule Installation Technology Development

3. Overview A proposal was submitted to the Major Research Instrumentation program for a 32 T all-superconducting magnet using YBCO coated conductor inner coils. The proposal was funded with an effective start date of Oct. 1, 2009, for a duration of three years. The scope of supply includes the full magnet system: inner and outer magnets, cryostat, power supply, and protection electronics. The installation of the magnet is presently planned for the milli-Kelvin facility.

4. 32 T Magnet Parameters Total field 32 T Field inner YBCO coils17 T Field outer LTS coils15 T Cold inner bore 32 mm Uniformity 5x10 -4 1cm DSV Current186 A Inductance436 H Stored Energy7.54 MJ YBCO Nb3Sn NbTi YBCO coil 123 Inner radius (mm)204777 Outer radius (mm)4271101 Coil length (mm)144240340 Field increment (T)5.75.75.6 Conductor length (km)0.752.45.2

5. 32 T Magnet System Components System component Source YBCO coilsNHMFL YBCO conductorindustry Outer magnetindustry Cryostatindustry Power supplyindustry Protection electronicsNHMFL FacilityNHMFL Both the YBCO conductor and the outer magnet are major components that will require collaboration with industry to establish the design and specification.

6. 32 T Project Schedule The funded project starts Q4 2009 and is planned for three years. The program has three phases: (1) development, (2) prototype coils, and (3) detailed design, fabrication and procurement. Major procurements include the YBCO conductor and the outer magnet. We are here.

7. milli-Kelvin Facility The low noise of the milli-Kelvin facility will offer best advantage for the inherently quiet 32 T superconducting magnet. The long term goal is the combine the 32 T magnet with a new dilution refrigerator. Along with the other superconducting magnets, the milli-Kelvin facility has the infrastructure and staff to support the 32 T magnet within the user facility.

8. milli-Kelvin Facility The 10 G and 100 G fringe field lines of the 32 T magnet are shown for potential locations in the milli-Kelvin facility.

9. Technology Development Topics Ic(B)critical current versus field Ic(θ)critical current versus field orientation Ic(ε)critical current versus strain σ(ε)stress strain curve Es(ε)secant modulus versus strain Joint Ic(ε) Joint resistance Joint strength Joint bend characteristics Insulation conductor Pancake winding Layer winding Quench protection

10. YBCO Critical Current Characterization Ic(B), Ic(θ), Ic(ε) Conductor is becoming well characterized. Sufficient data for 32 T design. Ic(B perp) Ic(θ) Ic(ε)

11. YBCO Mechanical Characterization σ(ε) stress-strain, Es(ε) secant modulus The conductor is mechanically well characterized for the 32 T design.

12. YBCO Joint Characterization There are a large number of joints in the 32 T YBCO coils. Measure joint mechanical strength is high with no shear delamination. The literature suggests high strain tolerance for soldered joints. Initial in-house measurements show relatively low values, but have been attributed to unconstrained bending in the tensile test. Further test method refinement and additional tests are underway.

13. Conductor Insulation Insulation processes under examination: Varnish dip coat facility in place at NHMFL demonstrated ability to coat with 25 μm build debonding observed at high conductor strain examine thinner builds, multiple pass Varnish spray coat equipment being assembled objective: thin uniform coat with edge coverage Oxide coat: ZnO, Al 2 O 3 Very thin coat potential < 1μm build Issues: adherence, rate of deposition, cost Working with industrial sources YBCO conductor is not supplied with a thin insulation suitable for high field magnet construction.

14. YBCO Coil Technology Development Process: Make a series of model and test coils. Focus on the detailed, systematic evaluation of components and processes. Establish a reliable technology prior to fabrication of major prototype coils. Options: Pancake wound coils. Positives: ease of winding and reinforcement, short conductor lengths. Negatives: large number of solder connections and components, vulnerability of external joints. Layer wound coils. Positives: unified winding pack, fewer connections Negatives: wide direction bend of conductor, joints within windings. Through a series of small coils, the technology will be established before fabrication of major prototype coils.

15. YBCO Test Coils SuperPower I. Bmax = 26.8 T ΔB = 7.8 T SuperPower II. Bmax = 27 T ΔB = 7 T NHMFL I. Bmax = 33.8 T ΔB = 2.8 T NHMFL II. Bmax = 20.4 T ΔB = 0.4 T

16. YBCO Test Coils and 32 T YBCO Coils SuperPower I. SuperPower II. NHMFL I. NHMFL II. 32 T YBCO Coils

17. Quench protection will be accomplished with densely distributed heaters. Heater response time and effective normal volume will be measured in series of layer and pancake wound coils. Quench protection study determines the required amount of copper in the conductor. Quench Protection at Low Normal Zone Propagation Velocity

18. Project Staffing Scott Bole (design) Andy Gavrilin (analysis) Ke Han (materials) Jan Jaroszynski (conductor) David Larbalestier (co-PI) Jun Lu (materials characterization) Denis Markiewicz (PI) Lee Marks (technician) Patrick Noyes (test) Ken Pickard (technician) Andy Powell (electronics) Bill Sheppard (technician) Kevin Smith (administration) Ulf Trociewitz (magnet design) Youri Viouchkov (design) Huub Weijers (test) Vaughn Williams (machine shop) Aixia Xu (conductor)

19. The End Thank You