1. Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network This presentation was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number DP005021-01 SIP14-011 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Looking Ahead to 80% by 2018 in Iowa Natoshia M. Askelson, MPH, PhD Edith A. Parker, Dr.PH Laura Seegmiller, MPH Sue Curry, PhD

2. University of Washington Oregon Health & Science University University of South Carolina University of North Carolina University of Pennsylvania Case Western Reserve University University of Kentucky University of Iowa

3. CPCRN: Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network Division of Cancer Prevention and Control of the CDC’s National Center of Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion & Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences of the National Cancer Institute Funding timeline: September 2014 – September 2019

5. CPCRN Strengths  Advancing science for implementation and translation research  Strong community partnerships  Focus on underserved populations  Broad geographic outreach  Research focus that complements NCI & CDC priorities  Infrastructure funding provides impetus to focus beyond discovery and be opportunistic

6. University of Iowa Prevention Research Center Federally Qualified Health Centers Signature Project HPV Vaccination Signature Project

7. FQHC Signature Project 1.Assess current CRC screening efforts, 2. Help FQHCs systematically select, combine, and implement CRC screening interventions in a way that maximizes impact, and 3.Support the evaluation of multi-level interventions.

8. FQHC Signature Project Co-chairs: Daniela Friedman (University of South Carolina), Catherine Rohweder (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) University of Iowa members: Natoshia Askelson, Edith Parker, Sue Curry, Laura Seegmiller

9. FQHC Signature Project What evidence-based interventions are FQHCs currently using to increase CRC screening rates? What evidence-based implementation strategies are FQHCs currently using to put CRC screening interventions into practice? What types of implementation supports are FQHCs currently accessing and what is their experience with those supports? How ready are FQHCs to implement and evaluate multi-level interventions to increase CRC screening rates? How are FQHCs using the tools, trainings, and technical assistance?

10. FQHC Signature Project Completed –Developed list of evidence-based interventions and implementation strategies –Attended 80% by 2018 Forum in Atlanta Next steps –Survey Study design and tool development –Qualitative interviews –Training and technical assistance/facilitation

11. FQHC Signature Project Iowa –Working with Iowa Primary Care Association –Looking for synergy Iowa Department of Public Health

12. Questions?